Jump to: navigation, search

Difference between revisions of "Tacker"

(ServiceVM/DeviceManager Project)
(Action Items)
Line 9: Line 9:
 
* create repo on stack-forge
 
* create repo on stack-forge
 
** design/code review process: gerrit
 
** design/code review process: gerrit
 +
* deployment model
 
* terminology conversion https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/ServiceVM/terminology
 
* terminology conversion https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/ServiceVM/terminology
 
* API/data model design https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/ServiceVM/api-datamodel
 
* API/data model design https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/ServiceVM/api-datamodel
* Neutron related stuff
+
* Neutron/Nova/oslo.messaging related stuff
 
** disable security groups: One thing that I am not sure if it has been discussed is, for L2 agent that supports security groups, such as ovs, some port filters are automatically enabled. Usually this is not what service VM wants. The port-security extension could be used to solve that issue, but it should be confirmed.(raised by Gary Duan)
 
** disable security groups: One thing that I am not sure if it has been discussed is, for L2 agent that supports security groups, such as ovs, some port filters are automatically enabled. Usually this is not what service VM wants. The port-security extension could be used to solve that issue, but it should be confirmed.(raised by Gary Duan)
  

Revision as of 07:01, 2 June 2014

Tacker: ServiceVM/DeviceManager Project

About new project

Action Items

  • discuss on starting incubation process: Would this project sustenable?
    • Do we have enough developer to contribute?
    • Do we have enough user/use case? How about NFV use case?
  • create repo on stack-forge
    • design/code review process: gerrit
  • deployment model
  • terminology conversion https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/ServiceVM/terminology
  • API/data model design https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/ServiceVM/api-datamodel
  • Neutron/Nova/oslo.messaging related stuff
    • disable security groups: One thing that I am not sure if it has been discussed is, for L2 agent that supports security groups, such as ovs, some port filters are automatically enabled. Usually this is not what service VM wants. The port-security extension could be used to solve that issue, but it should be confirmed.(raised by Gary Duan)

Links

resource tracking

  • bugs