Difference between revisions of "Governance/Foundation/RiskList"
< Governance | Foundation
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
* Do Gold Member directors retain their elected seat if they leave the company? | * Do Gold Member directors retain their elected seat if they leave the company? | ||
* What mechanism exists to provide transparency into the corporate affiliations of individual members? | * What mechanism exists to provide transparency into the corporate affiliations of individual members? | ||
| + | * What is the definition of "Strategic Alignment" with [[OpenStack]]? | ||
| + | * Why are Platinum Members required to have strategic alignment, but not Gold Members or Individual Members? | ||
| + | * How is "Strategic Alignment" audited? | ||
Revision as of 17:47, 18 March 2012
Risk Mitigation List
This page will contain a list of possible problems that may arise during the operation of the Foundation. Add items below. We will create a mechanism to prioritize and add comments in the coming weeks.
- If the employees of "Strategic Members" are also "Individual Members" does htis mean that Strategic members effectiveley get counted twice?
- What mechanism is used to limit the number of Strategic Members?
- What mechanism exists to remove projects from OpenStack core if necessary?
- Do Gold Member directors retain their elected seat if they leave the company?
- What mechanism exists to provide transparency into the corporate affiliations of individual members?
- What is the definition of "Strategic Alignment" with OpenStack?
- Why are Platinum Members required to have strategic alignment, but not Gold Members or Individual Members?
- How is "Strategic Alignment" audited?
