Difference between revisions of "Tracking ML2 Subgroup Reviews"
(→Specs proposed to Kilo Release) |
|||
| (223 intermediate revisions by 22 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | __NOTOC__ | |
| − | {| class="wikitable" | + | Here are tables for tracking the status of the specs related to ML2 in current release. |
| + | |||
| + | == The guideline for updating this wiki is at the [[#Guide|end of this page]] == | ||
| + | |||
| + | === Specs proposed to Kilo Release === | ||
| + | |||
| + | For categories, please see the description at the bottom. | ||
| + | |||
| + | {| class="wikitable sortable" | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | ! Title !! | + | !! scope="col" class="unsortable" | Title |
| + | !! scope="col" | Owner | ||
| + | !! scope="col"| Code | ||
| + | !! scope="col" | Status | ||
| + | !! scope="col" | Comments | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | + | | [https://review.openstack.org/#/c/99873/ portsecurity extension support] || Isaku Yamahata || [https://review.openstack.org/#/c/129178/ passing db entry extend dict] [https://review.openstack.org/#/c/152759/ passing plugin context to ext driver] [https://review.openstack.org/#/c/152759/ extension_driver][https://review.openstack.org/126552 port-sec-ext][https://review.openstack.org/150835 WIP] || || | |
|- | |- | ||
| − | + | | [https://review.openstack.org/#/c/106185/ ML2 hierarchical port binding] ||rkukura || [https://review.openstack.org/#/c/115110/ api] [https://review.openstack.org/#/c/116122/ db] [https://review.openstack.org/#/c/116209/ logic] || merged || need additional tests | |
| − | + | |} | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | === Planned === | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | {| class="wikitable" | |
| − | + | |- | |
| − | + | ! Title/BP !! Owner !! Comment | |
| − | + | |- | |
| + | | ML2 Async driver invocation || manishg || [https://review.openstack.org/#/c/154333 poc-code] | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | | + | | Modular L2 Agent || banix || On hold |
|- | |- | ||
| − | + | | [https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/ofagent-sub-driver ofagent: sub driver] || yamamoto || probably some overlap with modular l2 agent | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
|} | |} | ||
| + | |||
| + | = Guide = | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Mechanism Drivers do not need a blueprint starting Kilo Release (?) | ||
| + | * The owner of a given spec is responsible for keeping the corresponding row in this table up to date | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | === Other Considerations === | ||
| + | * Should we do the same for regular (not specs) neutron reviews? Will that be too much? We can wait and see if the current table will be used and if it will make the review process any better and then decide. | ||
| + | * Any changes we can make to Launchpad and/or Gerrit review that will make the tracking of the specs easier and that will make using a table like this unnecessary? | ||
Latest revision as of 13:41, 18 February 2015
Here are tables for tracking the status of the specs related to ML2 in current release.
The guideline for updating this wiki is at the end of this page
Specs proposed to Kilo Release
For categories, please see the description at the bottom.
| Title | Owner | Code | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| portsecurity extension support | Isaku Yamahata | passing db entry extend dict passing plugin context to ext driver extension_driverport-sec-extWIP | ||
| ML2 hierarchical port binding | rkukura | api db logic | merged | need additional tests |
Planned
| Title/BP | Owner | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| ML2 Async driver invocation | manishg | poc-code |
| Modular L2 Agent | banix | On hold |
| ofagent: sub driver | yamamoto | probably some overlap with modular l2 agent |
Guide
- Mechanism Drivers do not need a blueprint starting Kilo Release (?)
- The owner of a given spec is responsible for keeping the corresponding row in this table up to date
Other Considerations
- Should we do the same for regular (not specs) neutron reviews? Will that be too much? We can wait and see if the current table will be used and if it will make the review process any better and then decide.
- Any changes we can make to Launchpad and/or Gerrit review that will make the tracking of the specs easier and that will make using a table like this unnecessary?
