- 1 Project codename
- 2 Trademarks
- 3 Summary
- 4 Parent Program name and PTL
- 5 Mission statement
- 6 Detailed Description
- 7 Basic roadmap for the project
- 8 Location of project source code
- 9 Programming language, required technology dependencies
- 10 Is project currently open sourced? What license?
- 11 Level of maturity of software and team
- 12 Project developers qualifications
- 13 Infrastructure requirements (testing, etc)
- 14 Have all current contributors agreed to the OpenStack CLA?
(Does this project name, codename or contents use any trademarks, and if so, who owns them? List the codenames or other marks for which a trademark search should occur.)
No known trademarks.
Tacker is a servicevm/device life cycle management for openstack clouds
Parent Program name and PTL
Neutron networking/Kyle Mestery
provide common framework/ground work for life cycle management of ServiceVMs and virtual/physical services.
establish/encourage ecosystem of virtual/physical appliance on OpenStack. To make it easy for appliance providers to integrate their appliances (services implemented in virtual machines (a.k.a. ServiceVM) or physical hardware) with OpenStack by providing unified interface for life cycle management of VMs/Services which is capable of multiple service/vendor.
(Background: this project is spin-out project from Neutron)
It is a quite common requirement to run services in virtual machines aka ServiceVM. So far each OpenStack service(Especially Neutron case) implemented their own life cycle management of ServiceVMs/services and hardware. Preparing/pooling/scheduling VMs/services and so on. It resulted in duplicated work and rises the bar for appliance provide to integrate appliances with OpenStack.
This project introduces a new service for managing servicevm/device. Its responsibility is to:
- manage VMs/devices/services
- control the allocation of processing capacity in such devices As such the servicevm/device manager mainly serves other projects. Another natural responsibility of this service would be to keep track of and store the physical topology that the devices are part of.
- pluggable for each VMs/physical devices/services
This is also missing part of NFV MANO architecture. http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/89/slides/slides-89-opsawg-7.pdf
- corresponding component:
- VNFM(VNF Manager)
- corresponding interfaces:
- VNF lifecycle management interface
- VNF lifecycle changes notifications interface
- VNF configuration interface
Basic roadmap for the project
from Near term to middle term (Note: Addressing missing features for Neutron/Nova: some features are missing in Neutron/Nova. Those features can be addressed independently of this project.)
- produce a minimul working code as an independent service(out of Neutron. So far there were two implementations within Neutron)
- design review process: gerrit, wiki, google-doc
- terminology conversion
- API/data model design
- Actual coding(server, python client)
- establish testing
- Corporate with Neutron driver for Network service in VM (e.g. router vm, firewall vm) that interacts with Tacker
- make use of currently missing Neutron feature like service insertion
At first temporal shim code will be needed in Neutron for service insertion, traffic steering and so on. At this moment those features are under development. Once such features are stabilized and public RestAPI is provided, convert the implmentation to use RestAPI and remove the temporal shim code.
- consider generic VM/service scheduling
Location of project source code
Programming language, required technology dependencies
language: Python Dependencies: alembic, eventlet, sqlalchemy, pbr, xxx (??? pecan, jsonschema, ...)
Is project currently open sourced? What license?
yes and apache 2.0
Level of maturity of software and team
TODO(to be written)
The team has worked for more than 3 months as Neutron subteam. It as independent project out of Neutron started to work since May 2014. From three(XXX) differenct companies(Cisco, Midokura, Intel. XXX)
Project developers qualifications
Bob Melander(bmelande on irc)
Cicco - Core Developer xxx(put BIO)
Stephen Wong(s3wong on irc)
Midokura - Core Developer xxx(put BIO)
Isaku Yamahata(yamahata on irc)
Intel Senior Software Engineer - Core Developer xxx(put BIO)
Cisco - Developer xxx(put BIO)
xxx To be added more
Infrastructure requirements (testing, etc)
no additional requirements to the current OpenStack Infrastructure
Have all current contributors agreed to the OpenStack CLA?