Difference between revisions of "Swift/PriorityReviews"
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
= Review Priorities = | = Review Priorities = | ||
− | + | In preparation for Swift 2.10.0, which is to be included in the OpenStack Newton release, please prioritize these reviews: | |
+ | |||
+ | == Should land == | ||
+ | |||
+ | https://review.openstack.org/#/c/162243/ | ||
+ | * object creation more atomic in linux | ||
+ | * needs another +2 | ||
+ | * will land | ||
+ | |||
+ | https://review.openstack.org/#/c/348495/ | ||
+ | * critical bug affecting prod for HPE | ||
+ | * needs to land | ||
+ | |||
+ | https://review.openstack.org/#/c/215276/ | ||
+ | * object server return non-durable data | ||
+ | * -1 from kota, needs comment from acoles | ||
+ | * should land | ||
+ | |||
+ | https://review.openstack.org/#/c/355958/ | ||
+ | * eliminate .durable files | ||
+ | * hopefully land | ||
+ | * large patch, but the vast majority is tests | ||
+ | |||
+ | https://review.openstack.org/#/c/323950/ | ||
+ | * refactor locale tests | ||
+ | * small patch | ||
+ | * should land, but has -1 from clayg | ||
+ | |||
+ | https://review.openstack.org/#/c/357559/ | ||
+ | * include metadata on PUT/POST responses | ||
+ | * should land | ||
+ | |||
+ | https://review.openstack.org/#/c/210099/ | ||
+ | * process-level concurrency from container sync | ||
+ | * why hasn't it landed yet? | ||
+ | * should land | ||
+ | |||
+ | https://review.openstack.org/#/c/347538/ | ||
+ | * store SLO Etag and size in sysmeta | ||
+ | * might land | ||
+ | |||
+ | ---- | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Would be nice to land == | ||
+ | |||
+ | https://review.openstack.org/#/c/219165/ | ||
+ | * global EC | ||
+ | * kota really wants it in | ||
+ | * big change for last minute? | ||
+ | |||
+ | https://review.openstack.org/#/c/232162/ | ||
+ | * symlink | ||
+ | * unlikely to land due to size vs deadline | ||
+ | |||
+ | https://review.openstack.org/#/c/337297/ | ||
+ | * increase ring part power | ||
+ | * no current reviews | ||
+ | * unlikely to land do to size vs deadline | ||
+ | |||
+ | ---- | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Very very unlikely to land, but look at these after all of the above have landed == | ||
+ | |||
+ | https://review.openstack.org/#/c/356715/ | ||
+ | * json account ACLs with keystoneauth | ||
+ | * unlikely to land | ||
+ | |||
+ | https://review.openstack.org/#/c/337960/ | ||
+ | * send correct SLO Etag for container update | ||
+ | * I want to defer this to discuss more about the client-visible impact | ||
+ | |||
+ | https://review.openstack.org/#/c/336323/ | ||
+ | * test xattrs | ||
+ | * needs gate change to pass | ||
+ | * won't land | ||
+ | |||
+ | https://review.openstack.org/#/c/218490/ | ||
+ | * referesh memcache settings | ||
+ | * not critical, but nice to have | ||
+ | |||
− | |||
= Bug Triage Links = | = Bug Triage Links = |
Revision as of 18:32, 12 September 2016
Swift Review Dashboard: https://goo.gl/eqeGwE
Contents
Review Priorities
In preparation for Swift 2.10.0, which is to be included in the OpenStack Newton release, please prioritize these reviews:
Should land
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/162243/
- object creation more atomic in linux
- needs another +2
- will land
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/348495/
- critical bug affecting prod for HPE
- needs to land
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/215276/
- object server return non-durable data
- -1 from kota, needs comment from acoles
- should land
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/355958/
- eliminate .durable files
- hopefully land
- large patch, but the vast majority is tests
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/323950/
- refactor locale tests
- small patch
- should land, but has -1 from clayg
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/357559/
- include metadata on PUT/POST responses
- should land
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/210099/
- process-level concurrency from container sync
- why hasn't it landed yet?
- should land
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/347538/
- store SLO Etag and size in sysmeta
- might land
Would be nice to land
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/219165/
- global EC
- kota really wants it in
- big change for last minute?
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/232162/
- symlink
- unlikely to land due to size vs deadline
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/337297/
- increase ring part power
- no current reviews
- unlikely to land do to size vs deadline
Very very unlikely to land, but look at these after all of the above have landed
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/356715/
- json account ACLs with keystoneauth
- unlikely to land
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/337960/
- send correct SLO Etag for container update
- I want to defer this to discuss more about the client-visible impact
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/336323/
- test xattrs
- needs gate change to pass
- won't land
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/218490/
- referesh memcache settings
- not critical, but nice to have
Bug Triage Links
swiftclient bugs: https://goo.gl/uO4b7l <-- bugs that are marked "New" and need triage
swift bugs: https://goo.gl/LMiiDc <-- bugs that are marked "New" and need triage
Swift Review Dashboard