Jump to: navigation, search

Difference between revisions of "StructuredStateManagement"

(Definitions)
(More Details!)
Line 130: Line 130:
  
 
== More  Details! ==
 
== More  Details! ==
 +
See: [[StructuredWorkflowPrimitives]]
 +
 
See: [[StructuredStateManagementDetails]]
 
See: [[StructuredStateManagementDetails]]

Revision as of 00:18, 9 May 2013

Structured state management

Please note that this is a PROPOSAL ONLY. This is not yet 100% implemented.

Drafter: Harlowja

Rationale

Move away from ad-hoc states and state transitions for resource acquisition and modification to a more well-defined organized state management system. This new state management system will have advanced new & shiny features such as greater stability, automatic recovery mechanisms and greater scalability than what currently exists (and more!).

Definitions

State
The particular condition that someone or something is in at a specific time: "the state of the instance request".
State transition
Altering a state by applying a function on-top of that state (of which said function may take inputs and provide outputs) resulting in a new state.
Task
The application of a state transition on a given state.
Workflow
The sequence of administrative/other processes through which a piece of work passes from initiation to completion.
State management engine
An individual or entity that arranges or control the elements of, as to achieve a desired overall effect.

What problems does this solve in general

  • Increases the ['extendability', 'recoverability', 'reliability', 'stability'] of states and state transitions.
  • Makes it easier to [ 'add new', 'debug', 'review', 'test', 'understand', 'verify'] existing & new states and state transitions.
  • Removes hard to discover state & transition dependencies and interactions.
  • Ensures state transitions are done ['correctly', 'reliably'] by isolating those transitions to a entity whose exclusive responsibility is to ['correctly', 'reliably'] perform those transitions.
  • Fixes a variety of problems that previously had piecemeal like patches applied to solve them.
  • Eliminates the inherent fragility of the current ad-hoc workflows.
    • They are by there ad-hoc nature hard to debug, hard to verify/modify, hard to adjust, hard to understand (just hard in general)...
  • Allows for upgrading a cloud with inflight actions without needing later manual cleanup of said actions.
  • Makes it possible to audit & track the state transitions performed on a given resource in a unified manner.
    • Note: that there currently exists notifications, logging, event reporting as different mechanisms (which are not used in a uniform manner).
  • Removes the need for certain types of periodic tasks
    • This by side-effect increases scale since said periodic tasks start to consume more and more resources as you get bigger.
  • Addresses the underlying key point of http://www.slideshare.net/harlowja/nova-states-summit/9 where states will now be fully & automatically recovered from on cutting events (node failure, resource failure, network failure..).

What problems does this solve in nova (on-top of the general ones)

  • Removes the need for periodic tasks to cleanup garbage (orphaned instances/resources/tasks...) left behind.
  • Removes the usage of the overused set_instance_error_state() function in nova (or at least decreases its usage).
  • Creates the foundation for a more reliable and automatic recovery process when errors do occur.
  • Creates the path for smart resource scheduling by allowing the altering and/or replacement of the scheduling workflow with a more complex workflow.
  • Encourages the altering and extension of default workflows with a more complex or custom workflows.
  • Makes it possible to do ['live migration', 'resizing'] in a more secure and manageable manner.

Issues that would likely not have happened with a better state management system

Blueprints

Related papers

Related wikis

Potential Requirements

https://etherpad.openstack.org/task-system

Summit Discussions

Havana summit: https://etherpad.openstack.org/the-future-of-orch

Plan of record

Step 1

Create prototype

  1. Create core workflow/task library and prototype using said library in nova for run_instance action.
  2. Split this action (refactored) into small atomic task chunks (don't aim for perfection just yet, since its a prototype).
  3. Organize chunks into a workflow and test workflow.
  4. Show working prototype at summit session (with associated docs...)

Step 2

  1. Get feedback on prototype from people involved in making it + other interested parties.
  2. Get feedback from summit session.
  3. Get more feedback from email list + other interested parties.

Step 3

  1. Adjust nova prototype as needed from feedback.
  2. Split nova prototype into small chunks.
  3. Adjust tests for each small chunks (depending on what it changes) and add new ones for new functionality.
  4. Submit chunks into http://review.openstack.org (disabling whole/pieces component until ready to turn on?).

Step 4

  1. Pick another nova action and refactor it to use design from prototype.
  2. Split this other action (refactored) into small atomic task chunks.
  3. Organize chunks into a workflow and test workflow.
  4. Adjust unit tests for each small chunks (depending on what it changes) and add new ones for new functionality.
  5. Submit chunks into http://review.openstack.org (disabling whole/pieces component until ready to turn on?).
  6. Rinse & repeat.

Prototype

https://github.com/Yahoo/NovaOrc

Design

New-arch.png

Workflow

Run workflow.png

More Details!

See: StructuredWorkflowPrimitives

See: StructuredStateManagementDetails