Jump to: navigation, search

Difference between revisions of "Stewardship Working Group"

(Tuesday, August 30th 1500 UTC)
(Tuesday, August 30th 1500 UTC)
Line 12: Line 12:
 
amrith, dhellmann, gothicmindfood, ttx, jroll, johnthetubaguy, sdague, mordred, carolbarrett, nikhil, mugsie, thingie,
 
amrith, dhellmann, gothicmindfood, ttx, jroll, johnthetubaguy, sdague, mordred, carolbarrett, nikhil, mugsie, thingie,
  
== Tuesday, August 30th 1500 UTC ==
+
== Tuesday, September 13th 1500 UTC ==
 
WHERE: openstack-meeting-3  
 
WHERE: openstack-meeting-3  
  
 
'''1 Review Action items from last week'''
 
'''1 Review Action items from last week'''
  
    * amrith make a courtesy ping script for this meeting :)
+
 
     * gothicmindfood to update https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/swg-short-list-deliverables section 2
+
     * everyone to continue to review https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/BarcelonaSWGMagic with a goal of having comments and updates in by end of this week
     * ttx to put his comments on why consensus by Z's won't work for the TC in etherpad
+
     * nikhil to tinker with the vision and update etherpad
     * gothicmindfood to work on getting mordred's document out for broader distribution
+
     * everyone to review this https://review.openstack.org/#/c/357260/ and update with comments
    * ttx take morderd's document and make it into a review.
 
    * gothicmindfood to start on SWG vision for Barcelona Summit
 
  
 
'''1 Take a pass through the 'short list' and update items as required'''
 
'''1 Take a pass through the 'short list' and update items as required'''
Line 28: Line 26:
 
[https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/swg-short-list-deliverables Etherpad]
 
[https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/swg-short-list-deliverables Etherpad]
  
'''2 Quick recap of NYC meeting for those who weren't there'''
+
'''2 Discuss any documents that are available for review'''
 
 
'''3 Discuss any documents that are available for review'''
 
 
 
'''4 Documenting vision: when, where, who? (nikhil) '''
 
 
 
    * Should we have a vision statement for OpenStack/TC/SWG first, followed by individual teams?
 
    * Do project mission statement(s) overlap with vision statement(s)?
 
    * What should be considered provenance of vision (statements)?
 
  
'''5 Open Discussion'''
+
'''3 Open Discussion'''
  
  
  
 
[[Meetings/SWGMeeting-AgendaHistory|Meeting Agenda History]]
 
[[Meetings/SWGMeeting-AgendaHistory|Meeting Agenda History]]

Revision as of 16:07, 30 August 2016

Stewardship Working Group (SWG) Meetings

The OpenStack Technical Committee adopted a resolution on July 12 2016 to setup the Stewardship Working Group (SWG).

It was the stated intent in establishing this working group that the community would benefit from establishing a small group to review the leadership, communication, and decision making processes of the TC and OpenStack projects as a whole, and propose a set of improvements based on the the concepts of "Servant Leadership" and "Stewardship". The SWG will be responsible for producing actionable recommendations and improvements that the TC can then consider for adoption and roll out to the OpenStack community. Anyone interested in leadership, stewardship, and OpenStack is welcome to join the working group.

The SWG is an advisory body. Final decisions about any changes proposed by the SWG will be made by the TC.

Courtesy Ping List

<Please append your irc nick at the tail of the list>

amrith, dhellmann, gothicmindfood, ttx, jroll, johnthetubaguy, sdague, mordred, carolbarrett, nikhil, mugsie, thingie,

Tuesday, September 13th 1500 UTC

WHERE: openstack-meeting-3

1 Review Action items from last week


   * everyone to continue to review https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/BarcelonaSWGMagic with a goal of having comments and updates in by end of this week
   * nikhil to tinker with the vision and update etherpad
   * everyone to review this https://review.openstack.org/#/c/357260/ and update with comments

1 Take a pass through the 'short list' and update items as required

Etherpad

2 Discuss any documents that are available for review

3 Open Discussion


Meeting Agenda History