Jump to: navigation, search

Difference between revisions of "Stewardship Working Group"

m
Line 1: Line 1:
== Stewardship Working Group (SWG) Meetings ==
+
= Stewardship Working Group (SWG) Meetings =
  
 
The [https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Governance/Foundation/TechnicalCommittee OpenStack Technical Committee] adopted a [https://review.openstack.org/#/c/337895/ resolution] [http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/tc/2016/tc.2016-07-12-20.01.html on July 12 2016] to setup the Stewardship Working Group (SWG).
 
The [https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Governance/Foundation/TechnicalCommittee OpenStack Technical Committee] adopted a [https://review.openstack.org/#/c/337895/ resolution] [http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/tc/2016/tc.2016-07-12-20.01.html on July 12 2016] to setup the Stewardship Working Group (SWG).
Line 7: Line 7:
 
The SWG is an advisory body. Final decisions about any changes proposed by the SWG will be made by the TC.
 
The SWG is an advisory body. Final decisions about any changes proposed by the SWG will be made by the TC.
  
== Tuesday, July 26th 1500 UTC ==
+
== Tuesday, <TBD> 1500 UTC ==
=== WHERE: openstack-meeting-3 ===
+
WHERE: openstack-meeting-3  
  
=== Agenda ===
+
'''1 Review Action items from last week'''
  
1. Establish schedule for weekly meeting
+
* [amrith] to follow-up with mordred on write-up which is a dependency for dhellman's writeup
 +
* [amrith] add agenda item for next meeting; should we adopt the consensus model
 +
* [amrith] resume updaing etherpad at item #15 at next meeting
 +
* [dhellmann] [fungi] add extra-atc nomination to release schedule
  
We currently have a bi-weekly meeting because of scheduling conflicts. Do we need a weekly meeting, how do we go about addressing the availability and time slots when meeting channels are available.
 
  
References:
+
'''2 Should we recommend to the TC that they adopt the consensus model'''
  
[http://doodle.com/poll/kdnr9kfgaamw4873 Doodle poll of meeting times]
+
    <placeholder: Amrith insert etherpad link here>
[https://review.openstack.org/#/c/338134/ The review proposing meeting times]
+
 
 +
'''3 Continue review items short list from last meeting'''
  
2. Review items short list from last meeting
 
  
 
[https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/swg-short-list-deliverables Etherpad]
 
[https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/swg-short-list-deliverables Etherpad]
  
3. Discuss any documents that are available for review
+
We got up to item 15, pick up the thread there.
 +
 
 +
'''4 Discuss any documents that are available for review'''
  
 
.. are there any? ..
 
.. are there any? ..
  
4. Open Discussion
+
'''5 Open Discussion'''
 +
 
 +
 
  
 
[[Meetings/SWGMeeting-AgendaHistory|Meeting Agenda History]]
 
[[Meetings/SWGMeeting-AgendaHistory|Meeting Agenda History]]

Revision as of 15:11, 27 July 2016

Stewardship Working Group (SWG) Meetings

The OpenStack Technical Committee adopted a resolution on July 12 2016 to setup the Stewardship Working Group (SWG).

It was the stated intent in establishing this working group that the community would benefit from establishing a small group to review the leadership, communication, and decision making processes of the TC and OpenStack projects as a whole, and propose a set of improvements based on the the concepts of "Servant Leadership" and "Stewardship". The SWG will be responsible for producing actionable recommendations and improvements that the TC can then consider for adoption and roll out to the OpenStack community. Anyone interested in leadership, stewardship, and OpenStack is welcome to join the working group.

The SWG is an advisory body. Final decisions about any changes proposed by the SWG will be made by the TC.

Tuesday, <TBD> 1500 UTC

WHERE: openstack-meeting-3

1 Review Action items from last week

  • [amrith] to follow-up with mordred on write-up which is a dependency for dhellman's writeup
  • [amrith] add agenda item for next meeting; should we adopt the consensus model
  • [amrith] resume updaing etherpad at item #15 at next meeting
  • [dhellmann] [fungi] add extra-atc nomination to release schedule


2 Should we recommend to the TC that they adopt the consensus model

    <placeholder: Amrith insert etherpad link here>

3 Continue review items short list from last meeting


Etherpad

We got up to item 15, pick up the thread there.

4 Discuss any documents that are available for review

.. are there any? ..

5 Open Discussion


Meeting Agenda History