Jump to: navigation, search

Difference between revisions of "Solum/ApiModel"

(Overview)
(Redirected page to Solum/Pipeline)
 
(8 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
=== Overview ===
+
#REDIRECT [[Solum/Pipeline]]
The design of Solum's API in release 2014.1.1 focuses primarily on resources to enable Application Lifecycle Management. It is suitable for expressing how to deploy an application, but it's not as useful for modeling a custom build/test/deploy pipeline for a given application taking into account everything needed in order to produce a CI/CD environment. This proposed design addresses that concern by detailing how the default behavior of Solum can be customized to accommodate a variety of different CI workflows.
 
 
 
From https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Solum:
 
“An OpenStack Related Stackforge project designed to make cloud services easier to consume and integrate into your application development process. “
 
 
 
Solum currently allows integration with simple development process using Git, and a pre-defined workflow. We plan to add components that will allow customization of events that happen before the application's deployment, such as testing, image building, and advancing between various environments.
 
 
 
==== Proposal ====
 
 
 
Empower the Application Developer to use his/her source tree (git repo) as a tool for building images, running tests and deploying into a variety of environments.
 
 
 
Allow the following inputs: from the Application Developer:
 
 
 
* Application source code
 
* Application Requirements (both build and runtime)
 
* Desired Pipeline Steps (eg. build, test, deploy)
 
* Target Deployment Environment (how and where the application is run “dev”, “staging” & “production”)
 
 
 
=== A usecase ===
 
 
 
* Given a git repo, whenever there is a commit pushed to the repo:
 
run local unit tests
 
* build an image from the app (with any requirements pre-built)
 
* deploy to a “staging” environment (where manual testing is done)
 
* deploy to the production environment
 
 
 
=== Definitions ===
 
I see 3 main entities:
 
* application (aka plan)
 
: git url
 
: required runtime services
 
: extra config:
 
* environments (still under discussion)
 
: how and where to deploy resources
 
: e.g. credentils, endpoints, location (region & AZ), compute type (VM, container) and scaling info.
 
* lifecycle
 
: the jobs to get the application from a git commit to a deployed heat stack
 
 
 
=== Example ===
 
 
 
applications:
 
  thingy:
 
    git_url: git://x.me/a.git
 
    services:
 
      - trove
 
        remote_logging
 
    config:
 
      custom_env: foo
 
environments:
 
  default:
 
    compute: docker
 
    trust_token: bla-bla
 
    region: SYD
 
    flavor: m1.small
 
  production:
 
    trust_token: foo-fee
 
    region: US1
 
    flavor: m1.large
 
lifecycle:
 
  check:
 
    type: task
 
    cmd: tox
 
  template_builder:
 
    type: build_template
 
    depends_on: check
 
    target_environment: {find_in_catalog: {name: production, type: environment}}
 
  image_builder:
 
    type: task
 
    depends_on: check
 
    cmd: “solum-build-app .”
 
  deploy:
 
    type: deploy_stack
 
    environment: {find_in_catalog: {name: production, type: environment}}
 
    template: {get_output: [template_builder, created_template_id]}
 
    image: {get_output: [image_builder, created_image_id]}
 
 
 
=== REST API ===
 
All the above applications/environments/lifecycle templates could be stored in glance
 
 
 
Then we just need the following API
 
 
Note: I can't think of a  better name than "project", any suggestions?
 
 
 
project/
 
project/<uuid>
 
project/<uuid>/stacks/  [return a list of links to heat stacks, normally one]
 
project/<uuid>/job_history/  [once we have mistral, this could be links to mistral jobs]
 
project/<uuid>/job_history/<uuid>
 
 
 
POST project/
 
{ lifecycle: <glance_id>,
 
  application: <glance_id>,
 
  need_git_trigger: true }
 
 
 
response:
 
{project_uuid: bla-abl,
 
  git_trigger_url: http://}
 
 
 
=== Old stuff ===
 
 
 
For DSL, we can also look at Mistral, Taskflow, Murano.
 
It will be great if more than one folks participate in the DSL discussions being proposed by Mistral guys
 
(ref. Email on Openstack-dev list).
 
 
 
Builder subsystem/service:
 
* Investigate Jenkins
 
* Investigate Mistral
 
 
 
[[File:Solum-internal.png|non-framed]]
 
 
 
Additional Issues:
 
* Long running workflows would need Solum to use trusts (and renew tokens periodically).
 
 
 
 
 
Build jobs need to be run on disposable VM's to be secure.
 
 
 
[[File:Solum-nodepool.png|non-framed]]
 

Latest revision as of 20:55, 17 May 2014

Redirect to: