Jump to: navigation, search

Difference between revisions of "Scientific SIG"

(IRC Meetings)
Line 34: Line 34:
  
 
This group is open to all members of the scientific OpenStack community and supporting vendors.
 
This group is open to all members of the scientific OpenStack community and supporting vendors.
 +
 +
== History ==
 +
 +
Significant dates for the working group (in reverse chronological order):
 +
 +
* ''[Please add latest activity for the #scientific-wg here at the top of this list]''
 +
* A proposal for hosting a face-to-face working group meeting was drafted at the following document: https://docs.google.com/document/d/10d7XDC1yw3thjxMMC1EXJlfmMAcjkfj2wnhH2MJgh9k/edit
 +
* The group was approved by the OpenStack foundation's User Committee board and wiki page minted on 15th January 2016.
 +
* The original proposal and call for nominations was drafted via this etherpad: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/scientific-wg
 +
* The #scientific-wg originated from a conversation in the hallways of the Tokyo OpenStack summit (Oct 2015), ideas originating from John Taylor, Paul Calleja, Stig Telfer, Jonathan Proulx, David F. Flanders, Lauren Sell & Tom Fifield.
  
 
== Meetings ==
 
== Meetings ==
Line 100: Line 110:
  
 
[http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/scientific_wg/2016/scientific_wg.2016-05-17-21.03.html Minutes from the meeting]
 
[http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/scientific_wg/2016/scientific_wg.2016-05-17-21.03.html Minutes from the meeting]
 
== History ==
 
 
Significant dates for the working group (in reverse chronological order):
 
 
* ''[Please add latest activity for the #scientific-wg here at the top of this list]''
 
* A proposal for hosting a face-to-face working group meeting was drafted at the following document: https://docs.google.com/document/d/10d7XDC1yw3thjxMMC1EXJlfmMAcjkfj2wnhH2MJgh9k/edit
 
* The group was approved by the OpenStack foundation's User Committee board and wiki page minted on 15th January 2016.
 
* The original proposal and call for nominations was drafted via this etherpad: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/scientific-wg
 
* The #scientific-wg originated from a conversation in the hallways of the Tokyo OpenStack summit (Oct 2015), ideas originating from John Taylor, Paul Calleja, Stig Telfer, Jonathan Proulx, David F. Flanders, Lauren Sell & Tom Fifield.
 
  
 
[[Category: Working_Groups]]
 
[[Category: Working_Groups]]

Revision as of 08:36, 1 June 2016

Status: Active (@May 2016)
Chairs: Stig Telfer and Blair Bethwaite
OpenStack Foundation liaison: David F. Flanders <Flanders@OpenStack.org>

Welcome to the OpenStack Scientific Working Group landing page.
Please cite this working group using the #scientific-wg tag on listservs, github, blogs, twitter and other social infrastructure.

Purpose

Aim: The Scientific Working Group is dedicated to representing and advancing the use-cases and needs of research and high-performance computing atop OpenStack. It's also a great forum for cross-institutional collaboration. If you are (or would like to) run OpenStack to support researchers/scientists/academics and/or HPC/HTC, then please join!

Objectives:

  • HPC/HTC Infrastructure
  • Research Data Infrastructure
  • Application Infrastructure
  • Social Infrastructure
  • Create opportunities for the scientific community to engage the wider OpenStack community, i.e. industry,


Communication

The default communication of our members is via the following open community mailing lists:


Please use the hashtag "scientific-wg" for tagging any etherpad URLs, code, blogs posts, scientific research and/or other social publishing platforms.

Members

No formal membership is required. Please introduce yourself and/or fellow colleagues to this working group using one of the mailing lists below, or by attending one of the IRC meetings.

This group is open to all members of the scientific OpenStack community and supporting vendors.

History

Significant dates for the working group (in reverse chronological order):

  • [Please add latest activity for the #scientific-wg here at the top of this list]
  • A proposal for hosting a face-to-face working group meeting was drafted at the following document: https://docs.google.com/document/d/10d7XDC1yw3thjxMMC1EXJlfmMAcjkfj2wnhH2MJgh9k/edit
  • The group was approved by the OpenStack foundation's User Committee board and wiki page minted on 15th January 2016.
  • The original proposal and call for nominations was drafted via this etherpad: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/scientific-wg
  • The #scientific-wg originated from a conversation in the hallways of the Tokyo OpenStack summit (Oct 2015), ideas originating from John Taylor, Paul Calleja, Stig Telfer, Jonathan Proulx, David F. Flanders, Lauren Sell & Tom Fifield.

Meetings

Face-to-Face

The Scientific Working Group usually meets at the OpenStack Design summits, and also at operators mid-cycle meetups (where possible).

IRC Meetings

For the best global coverage, IRC meetings are held in alternating time zones:

  • Every two weeks on even weeks, 2100 UTC on Tuesday in IRC channel #openstack-meeting
  • Every two weeks on odd weeks, 0700 UTC on Wednesday in IRC channel #openstack-meeting

Full details (including a calendar file) are available at eavesdrop.openstack.org. If you need help getting started with IRC see http://docs.openstack.org/upstream-training/irc.html.

IRC Meeting May 31st 2016

2016-05-31 2100 UTC in channel #openstack-meeting

  1. Newton cycle activity planning and brainstorming, including:
    1. User stories
      1. OpenStack and HPC white paper
      2. Comparison and prioritisation of user stories and reference architectures
    2. Bare metal
      1. Feature development for Newton cycle
    3. Parallel filesystems
      1. Looking for a lead for this activity area
    4. Accounting and scheduling
      1. Looking for a lead for this activity area
  2. Other development activities of interest

Minutes from the meeting

IRC Meeting May 25th 2016

2016-05-25 0700 UTC in channel #openstack-meeting

  1. Action items from last week's meeting
  2. Newton cycle activity planning and brainstorming, including:
    1. Parallel filesystems
      1. A survey is needed of current capabilities and best practices for the different use cases.
    2. Accounting and scheduling.
      1. A user story from the Product WG covering quotas and capacity planning looks relevant. Review for differences or additional contributions from a research computing use case.
    3. User stories.
      1. The User Story workflow is described here. Consider which research computing use cases have differentiation to make them a worthwhile user story.
      2. Some high-level details on reference architectures are given as architecture examples and use cases in the OpenStack operations guide.
      3. Case study contributors for a white paper on using OpenStack for HPC.
    4. Bare metal
  3. Other development activities of interest

Minutes from the meeting

IRC Meeting May 17th 2016

2016-05-17 2100 UTC in channel #openstack-meeting

  1. Newton cycle activity planning and brainstorming, including:
    1. User stories
    2. Bare metal
    3. Parallel filesystems
    4. Accounting and scheduling
  2. Other development activities of interest

Minutes from the meeting