Jump to: navigation, search

Difference between revisions of "Nova"

(talk)
Line 14: Line 14:
 
=== What Needs to be Done ===
 
=== What Needs to be Done ===
 
* Detach from Amazon/Eucalyptus specifics and make some things more generic
 
* Detach from Amazon/Eucalyptus specifics and make some things more generic
** AOE
+
** API:  We need to add the Rackspace API, and a caching layer
*** Definitely needs to be adapted for other services like [[CloudFiles]], gluster, etc
+
*** It is not reasonable for us to use the Amazon API, we would be unable to innovate and would constantly be catch up
 +
*** We would also need to add a distinct API for each service we layer on top, so they can be used  with either the ec2 or racjkspace API's
 +
* AOE
 +
** Definitely needs to be adapted for other services like [[CloudFiles]], gluster, etc
 
* Defaults of VLANs could be changed
 
* Defaults of VLANs could be changed
 
** though you can manually allocate IPs or use DHCP (see /compute/network.py)
 
** though you can manually allocate IPs or use DHCP (see /compute/network.py)

Revision as of 19:40, 10 June 2010

Nova Cloud Review

The purpose of this document is to capture the pluses and minuses of using Nova's code as a part of Cloud servers v2

What's Done

  • Scalable and elastic architecture - fully message based and asynchronous
  • Many months ahead of us
  • written in good Python
  • open source and it appears that they will be following an open development model
  • have stubbed out all components for testing
  • Actually write SSH keys and authorized_keys properly
  • All functionality is created via an adapter model, so implementations (for instance, storage backends, messaging backends, etc) can be swapped out as needed

What Needs to be Done

  • Detach from Amazon/Eucalyptus specifics and make some things more generic
    • API: We need to add the Rackspace API, and a caching layer
      • It is not reasonable for us to use the Amazon API, we would be unable to innovate and would constantly be catch up
      • We would also need to add a distinct API for each service we layer on top, so they can be used with either the ec2 or racjkspace API's
  • AOE
    • Definitely needs to be adapted for other services like CloudFiles, gluster, etc
  • Defaults of VLANs could be changed
    • though you can manually allocate IPs or use DHCP (see /compute/network.py)
  • Functionality needed by hosting providers
    • Metrics
      • CPU, memory, disk usage, network RX/TX
      • but, again, the backend storage is already taken care of...
  • Billing
    • Need to define the billable events in a model
  • Admin client is AWS-specific and needs an adapter interface
    • see /adminclient.py
  • Only supports AMIs
  • Requires use of euca2ools, which are tainted
  • Overarching documentation is sparse (though the code comments are pretty decent)
  • twisted (and Python) is, by nature, single-core, so it *may* be a bottleneck, but that remains to be demonstrated
  • No support for gluster or drbd, but there are adapters for plugging such functionality into the app domain
  • Add an endpoint so different compute clusters can be discovered for different clusters, especially when distributed geographically.
  • Configuration management is almost non-existent
    • Need to plugin/adapt the configuration retrieval
    • Puppet, Chef, or even a DKVS
    • The "flavors" are hardcoded in /compute/node.py (grep for INSTANCE_TYPES)

Unknowns

  • Asked jm to take a looksie into any possible Windows issues with the code base (in using Windows as a host with Hyper-V? Not sure what this means)
    • We know that ssh keys will not work with windows, so another method is necessary