Jump to: navigation, search

Neutron/ReviewDays

< Neutron
Revision as of 17:22, 11 August 2012 by Snaiksat (talk)

We are thinking about having an assigned reviewer for each day.

Review duty rotates between every (human) member of quantum-core. If you are the assigned reviewer, it's your responsibility to: /* start */

  • Set blueprint proposals to "Approved" if appropriate, or request more information.
  • Review patches.
  • Assign domain experts to patches withouth a review. In this case the domain expert might be or might not be a core dev. In the latter case a core dev should probably be selected as well for the branch.
  • Respond to queries from contributors concerning pending reviews or blueprint approvals.
  • Pester assigned reviewers to review branches.

/* end */

Active reviews for trunk: https://review.openstack.org/#q,status:open+project:openstack/quantum,n,z

Every human member of quantum-core should be part of this rotation. As we have core developers in several we will try to leverage this as much as possible. For this reason, the table below has 3 columns corresponding to 3 different time "areas": Americas, EMEA, and APAC.

Approximately a core reviewer would be available in the following hours: /* start */

  • APAC: 1AM GMT - 9AM GMT
  • EMEA: 9AM GMT - 5PM GMT
  • Americas: 5PM GMT - 1AM GMT

/* end */

It would be great if we could fill every column for each day, but having just one reviewer on duty in a given time area 4 days out of 5 would probably be an acceptable result. The idea is to start this scheme on Monday June 18th, and Update this schedule every 2 weeks, in order to accomodate as much as possible for holydays or other things.

See People for mappings between real names and IRC handles.

Day Americas EMEA
Monday July 30th TBA TBA
Tuesday July 31st TBA Salvatore Orlando
Wednesday August 1st Bob Kukura Salvatore Orlando
Thursday August 2nd Sumit Naiksatam TBA
Friday August 3rd Dan Wendlandt Gary Kotton
Saturday August 4th TBA TBA
Sunday August 5th Somik Behera Gary Kotton
Monday August 6th Edgar Magana Gary Kotton
Tuesday August 7th Somik Behera TBA
Wednesday August 8th Bob Kukura TBA
Thursday August 9th Sumit Naiksatam / Aaron Rosen Salvatore Orlando Gary Kotton
Friday August 10th Dan Wendlandt Salvatore Orlando
Saturday August 11th TBA TBA
Sunday August 12th TBA Gary Kotton
Monday August 13th Edgar Magana Salvatore Orlando
Tuesday August 14th Bob Kukura/Aaron Rosen Salvatore Orlando
Wednesday August 15th Dan Wendlandt Gary Kotton
Thursday August 16th Aaron Rosen Gary Kotton
Friday August 17th Sumit Naiksatam TBA
Saturday August 18th TBA TBA
Sunday August 19th TBA Gary Kotton

For Folsom-3, we have many LARGE reviews. Please sign up for the set of reviews that you will continue to revisit until they are merged for F-3.

Review Topic Review Link Core Dev #1
Provider Networks https://review.openstack.org/#/c/10938/ danwent
DB models for dns/routes https://review.openstack.org/#/c/10791/ sorlando
RPC support for LB Plugin https://review.openstack.org/#/c/9591/ sorlando
RPC support for OVS Plugin https://review.openstack.org/#/c/10879/ sorlando
RPC support for DHCP https://review.openstack.org/#/c/10997/ Gary Kotton
quotas API https://review.openstack.org/#/c/10484/ danwent
Public/shared Networks https://review.openstack.org/#/c/9845/ Gary Kotton
L3 + Floating IPs https://review.openstack.org/#/c/10993/ Aaron Rosen
L3 + Floating IP CLI/client https://review.openstack.org/#/c/10994/ sorlando
v2 devstack exercise scripts https://review.openstack.org/#/c/10828/ danwent
Per-network DHCP enable https://review.openstack.org/#/c/10320/ sorlando
bulk API operations https://review.openstack.org/#/c/10732/
v1 code removal https://review.openstack.org/#/c/10998/ Sumit Naiksatam
NEC plugin https://review.openstack.org/#/c/10664/ Gary Kotton
ISC DHCP https://review.openstack.org/#/c/10443/ Gary Kotton
Meta plugin https://review.openstack.org/#/c/10181/ Gary Kotton

Note: if you click through to a review and already seen that two other core devs are active on it, please sign up for other reviews so we can maximize coverage.

Note: there are many smaller reviews that we're not listing here. It does not mean that they are less important, just that they require less coordination regarding reviewer cycles. Also, if a review was for a plugin with an obvious set of core maintainers who would review (Nicira, Cisco), I omitted it.