Difference between revisions of "Network/Meetings"
Markmcclain (talk | contribs) (→Networking in Horizon (amotoki)) |
(→Other team reports (e.g. Open Source Plugins)) |
||
Line 91: | Line 91: | ||
** https://blueprints.launchpad.net/quantum/+spec/xenapi-ovs - One patch merged long ago. Patch https://review.openstack.org/#/c/15022/ in review. Patch https://review.openstack.org/#/c/15023/ restored and needs reviewers. On track for H-1? | ** https://blueprints.launchpad.net/quantum/+spec/xenapi-ovs - One patch merged long ago. Patch https://review.openstack.org/#/c/15022/ in review. Patch https://review.openstack.org/#/c/15023/ restored and needs reviewers. On track for H-1? | ||
** https://blueprints.launchpad.net/quantum/+spec/modular-l2 - WIP patch https://review.openstack.org/#/c/20105/ in review. Need to add linuxbridge support and tunnel support for openvswitch, add unit tests, get tested with hyperv. Initial merge on track for H-1. | ** https://blueprints.launchpad.net/quantum/+spec/modular-l2 - WIP patch https://review.openstack.org/#/c/20105/ in review. Need to add linuxbridge support and tunnel support for openvswitch, add unit tests, get tested with hyperv. Initial merge on track for H-1. | ||
− | ** https://blueprints.launchpad.net/quantum/+spec/portbinding-ex-db - Quantum patch https://review.openstack.org/#/c/24969/ merged. Still need Satish's nova patch https://review.openstack.org/#/c/21141/ to be merged. Quantum side ready | + | ** https://blueprints.launchpad.net/quantum/+spec/portbinding-ex-db - Quantum patch https://review.openstack.org/#/c/24969/ merged. Still need Satish's nova patch https://review.openstack.org/#/c/21141/ to be merged. Quantum side ready for H-1, but not getting exercised until nova side merged. |
** https://blueprints.launchpad.net/quantum/+spec/ovsplugin-hardware-devices - Review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/20754/ raises issues regarding relationship to ml2 plugin effort. Assuming ml2 does replace openvswitch and linuxbridge plugins, is ml2's (to-be-defined) MechanismDriver API sufficient, or is a separate HardwareDriver API still valuable? | ** https://blueprints.launchpad.net/quantum/+spec/ovsplugin-hardware-devices - Review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/20754/ raises issues regarding relationship to ml2 plugin effort. Assuming ml2 does replace openvswitch and linuxbridge plugins, is ml2's (to-be-defined) MechanismDriver API sufficient, or is a separate HardwareDriver API still valuable? | ||
** https://blueprints.launchpad.net/quantum/+spec/vxlan-linuxbridge - Review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/26516/ making good progress. Changes to linuxbridge plugin/agent RPC also needed for ml2 plugin, but RPC version needs to match openvswitch and hyperv. Assuming ml2 is replacing linuxbridge and a VxlanTypeDriver for ml2 can be developed for H-1, its not clear if server-side plugin changes for VXLAN should be merged yet. Should linuxbridge RPC changes be merged separately first before VXLAN added? | ** https://blueprints.launchpad.net/quantum/+spec/vxlan-linuxbridge - Review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/26516/ making good progress. Changes to linuxbridge plugin/agent RPC also needed for ml2 plugin, but RPC version needs to match openvswitch and hyperv. Assuming ml2 is replacing linuxbridge and a VxlanTypeDriver for ml2 can be developed for H-1, its not clear if server-side plugin changes for VXLAN should be merged yet. Should linuxbridge RPC changes be merged separately first before VXLAN added? |
Revision as of 20:58, 13 May 2013