Jump to: navigation, search

Difference between revisions of "Network/Meetings"

(Team Discussion Topics)
(Open Discussion)
Line 205: Line 205:
 
=== Open Discussion ===
 
=== Open Discussion ===
  
- Can we use opencontrail as refimpl for BGPVPN? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/93329/
+
* Can we use opencontrail as refimpl for BGPVPN? (nati_ueno)
 +
** https://review.openstack.org/#/c/93329/
 +
* I've started collecting wiki pages around Neutron policies (e.g. core team membership, gate failures, reviews, etc.)
 +
** Documented here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/NeutronPolicies
 +
** I encourage the core team and others to fill in the gaps
 +
** The idea is to have a single place for people to go with questions about Neutron, and to document as much of our process as possible
  
 
== Previous meeting logs ==
 
== Previous meeting logs ==

Revision as of 18:44, 2 June 2014


The OpenStack Networking Team (Neutron) holds public meetings in #openstack-meeting on Monday at 2100 UTC. Everyone is encouraged to attend.

Apologies for Absence

Agenda for Next Neutron Team Meeting

Announcements / Reminders

Bugs


These bugs are in nova but are related to neutron. It would be great if we could get neutron reviews on:

    • [1] Remove unneeded call to fetch network info on shutdown - arosen
    • [2] remove unneeded call to network_api on detach_interface - arosen
    • [3] remove unneeded call to network_api on rebuild_instance - arosen
    • [4] Optimize validate_networks to query neutron only when needed - arosen
    • [5] deallocate_for_instance should delete all neutron ports on error - arosen
    • [6] Fix port_security_enabled neutron extension - arosen
    • [7] Fix pre-created ports in neutron from being deleted by nova - arosen

Team Discussion Topics

  • oslo.messaging port here with ihrachyshka.
    • Continued discussion from last week
  • OVS firewall driver discussion with asadoughi
    • The question here is: OVS Firewall driver can only do 80% of existing iptables firewall driver (for now). Are we as a team ok with letting this BP into Juno with this limitation?

Docs (emagana)

High Priority Tickets:

Medium Priority Tickets:

Nova Parity (markmcclain)

Neutron Tempest (mlavalle)

API (salv-orlando)

No report

L3 (carl_baldwin)

(updated 2014-05-26)

See Meetings/Neutron-L3-Subteam for detail.

Advanced Services (SumitNaiksatam)

IPv6 (sc68cal)

Current blockers that need attention from core reviewers

ML2 (rkukura/Sukhdev)

  • Weekly Meetings/ML2 are held, please attend if interested!
    • Will discuss Juno summit sessions this week and prioritize plans

Group Policy (SumitNaiksatam)

FWaaS (SumitNaiksatam)

  • Critical bug has been downgraded to High, SridarK still investigating if this is actually a FWaaS issue
  • FWaaS Juno was submitted during Atlanta summit, please attend IRC meeting to followup: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/FWaaS

Open Discussion

  • Can we use opencontrail as refimpl for BGPVPN? (nati_ueno)
  • I've started collecting wiki pages around Neutron policies (e.g. core team membership, gate failures, reviews, etc.)
    • Documented here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/NeutronPolicies
    • I encourage the core team and others to fill in the gaps
    • The idea is to have a single place for people to go with questions about Neutron, and to document as much of our process as possible

Previous meeting logs