Jump to: navigation, search

Difference between revisions of "Network/Lib/Meetings"

(Open Discussion)
(Open Discussion)
Line 16: Line 16:
 
* [pc_m] Trying to get https://review.openstack.org/#/c/242219 passing tests. Doing pip install of neutron-lib in gate hook to handle two jobs. How can we handle other DSVM jobs that need neutron-lib? I'm not seeing any feasible way, other than to add neutron-lib to devstack-gate. Do we modify the other jobs to add gate hook? Do we get devstack-gate to install neutron-lib? Other?
 
* [pc_m] Trying to get https://review.openstack.org/#/c/242219 passing tests. Doing pip install of neutron-lib in gate hook to handle two jobs. How can we handle other DSVM jobs that need neutron-lib? I'm not seeing any feasible way, other than to add neutron-lib to devstack-gate. Do we modify the other jobs to add gate hook? Do we get devstack-gate to install neutron-lib? Other?
  
* [pc_m] Found issue with LBaaS using exceptions from neutron-lib. With LBaaS exception based on definitions from neutron-lib, with a base class of NeutronException, when the response for a REST request is returned, Neutron server will check to see if exception is an instance of neutron.common.exceptions.NeutronException and not neutron_lib.NeutronException, because Neutron is not using neutron-lib exceptions (we have two definitions of NeutronException, for example).
+
* [pc_m] I can commit code to start using the validators/converters in Neutron, with the thought of basing it off of 242219. However, we need tests working for this to be practical, IMO. Wondering, how we plan to address this.

Revision as of 16:36, 2 February 2016

Meeting time: The neutron-lib sub-Team (Neutron-Lib) holds public meetings on Wednesdays at 1730 UTC in the #openstack-meeting-4 channel on Freednode. Everyone is encouraged to attend.

Announcements / Reminders

  • None this week

Current Work Items

Open Discussion

  • [pc_m] For the callbacks mechanism, what do we need to do to make this public? I thought review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/265997/ would be a simple way to address concerns about using kwargs expressed in the original review, however, it has been abandoned. Sounds like we want to use OVO? Can we use 265997 as a base for that, changing the params arg to a versioned object (maybe check at register for OVO base class instance)? Also, I started a thread on how to roll out callbacks - http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-January/083964.html - would appreciate feedback, so that I don't waste effort.
  • [pc_m] Trying to get https://review.openstack.org/#/c/242219 passing tests. Doing pip install of neutron-lib in gate hook to handle two jobs. How can we handle other DSVM jobs that need neutron-lib? I'm not seeing any feasible way, other than to add neutron-lib to devstack-gate. Do we modify the other jobs to add gate hook? Do we get devstack-gate to install neutron-lib? Other?
  • [pc_m] I can commit code to start using the validators/converters in Neutron, with the thought of basing it off of 242219. However, we need tests working for this to be practical, IMO. Wondering, how we plan to address this.