Difference between revisions of "Network/Lib/Meetings"
(→Open Discussion) |
|||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
* Looking for feedback on the high-level approach for a public python API generation tool as in [https://review.openstack.org/#/c/338571/ 338571]. NB: code is not ready for review, just looking to understand if the current approach is worth honing further. | * Looking for feedback on the high-level approach for a public python API generation tool as in [https://review.openstack.org/#/c/338571/ 338571]. NB: code is not ready for review, just looking to understand if the current approach is worth honing further. | ||
* Have we put any thought into what impacts it would have if we released neutron-lib more frequently/continuously? For example suppose we did releases of neutron-lib every 2 weeks (for sake of argument); what implications would that have to our process and consumers? With our current release process there's a large latency when trying to get function into lib. While I understand the merits of this approach, it "seems" to impact adoption/consumption. | * Have we put any thought into what impacts it would have if we released neutron-lib more frequently/continuously? For example suppose we did releases of neutron-lib every 2 weeks (for sake of argument); what implications would that have to our process and consumers? With our current release process there's a large latency when trying to get function into lib. While I understand the merits of this approach, it "seems" to impact adoption/consumption. | ||
| + | * As per [http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/irclogs/%23openstack-meeting-4/%23openstack-meeting-4.2016-06-29.log.html our meeting] I thought we were going to get the neutron pep8 jobs running for neutron-lib gate? Is that going to happen? | ||
Revision as of 18:03, 7 July 2016
Meeting time: The neutron-lib sub-Team (Neutron-Lib) holds public meetings on Wednesdays at 1730 UTC in the #openstack-meeting-4 channel on Freednode. Everyone is encouraged to attend.
Announcements / Reminders
- None this week
Current Work Items
- Using the lib in neutron - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/268232/
- Moving base db gunk - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/267214/
Open Discussion
[boden]
- Looking for feedback on the high-level approach for a public python API generation tool as in 338571. NB: code is not ready for review, just looking to understand if the current approach is worth honing further.
- Have we put any thought into what impacts it would have if we released neutron-lib more frequently/continuously? For example suppose we did releases of neutron-lib every 2 weeks (for sake of argument); what implications would that have to our process and consumers? With our current release process there's a large latency when trying to get function into lib. While I understand the merits of this approach, it "seems" to impact adoption/consumption.
- As per our meeting I thought we were going to get the neutron pep8 jobs running for neutron-lib gate? Is that going to happen?
