Jump to: navigation, search

Difference between revisions of "Meetings/product-team"

(Jun 19th, 2017 (Monday @ 2100 UTC) Product Team Meeting Agenda)
Line 1: Line 1:
= Jun 26th, 2017 (Monday @ 2100 UTC) Product Team Meeting Agenda =
+
= July 10th, 2017 (Monday @ 2100 UTC) Product Team Meeting Agenda =
 
* Review of action items
 
* Review of action items
** Review Moderator Guide and provide feedback to mrhillsman and AndyU
+
 
** Should we conduct midcycle via teleconference solution... need to mail ML to determine interest.
+
* Midcycle video conferencing
 +
** Date, Time, Agenda
 +
 
 +
* Sydney Summit/Forum preparation
 +
** Proposal submission CFP deadline - July 14 at 11:59 pm PT
  
 
*  Development Proposals review
 
*  Development Proposals review
Line 19: Line 23:
  
 
* Open
 
* Open
** OpenStack SIG: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1gTeN5ZB2AnPPXejXOm08sQ75Fc-cMs-x-dOGwfsyM8w/edit#heading=h.kx0vp5ot98rv
+
 
 
   
 
   
 
<br><br>
 
<br><br>
  
 
''Information on previous agendas: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/pwg_previous_agendas''
 
''Information on previous agendas: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/pwg_previous_agendas''

Revision as of 17:59, 10 July 2017

July 10th, 2017 (Monday @ 2100 UTC) Product Team Meeting Agenda

  • Review of action items
  • Midcycle video conferencing
    • Date, Time, Agenda
  • Sydney Summit/Forum preparation
    • Proposal submission CFP deadline - July 14 at 11:59 pm PT
  • Development Proposals review
    • Need to build a plan to breakdown proposal readiness assessment process
  • OpenStack Boston Forum Hashtag
    • Need to break down the work and use WG meetings for making progress
  • Action Plan
    • PWG Review
      • Everyone think about the scope, processes, and team resources of the PWG and we can discuss what's awesome, what's okay, and what's broken in a future meeting (along with brainstorming solutions)
      • Given the limited resource we have, how can we make the Development Proposal process easier to be consumed/executed by other WG.
      • What's the next step to get more engagement/support from TC/PTL/Core
    • Value 1: Properly documenting ideas, getting a structured workflow, and integration into development workflow
    • Value 2: Periodic coordination/collaboration across WGs/Product Managers
  • Open




Information on previous agendas: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/pwg_previous_agendas