Jump to: navigation, search

Difference between revisions of "Meetings/Zaqar"

(Added storage drivers to backlog)
Line 25: Line 25:
 
Stuff we want to talk about in a future meeting:
 
Stuff we want to talk about in a future meeting:
  
 +
* Audit river - should we do it, and if so, should it be an optional or mandatory part of the spec?
 +
* Storage drivers - the good, the bad, and the ugly
 
* Delayed message delivery - use cases, what's the need, is it something we do now or later?
 
* Delayed message delivery - use cases, what's the need, is it something we do now or later?
 
* Supporting mobile devices, doing so securely (allowing mobile posts to a queue)
 
* Supporting mobile devices, doing so securely (allowing mobile posts to a queue)
Line 30: Line 32:
 
* Authentication in general
 
* Authentication in general
 
* Max payload size - give people what they need but also want to encourage appropriate usage of the service
 
* Max payload size - give people what they need but also want to encourage appropriate usage of the service
* Audit river - should we do it, and if so, should it be an optional or mandatory part of the spec?
 
  
 
== Previous meetings ==
 
== Previous meetings ==

Revision as of 19:59, 14 February 2013

Weekly Marconi (queuing) meeting

The Marconi project team holds a meeting in #openstack-meeting-alt:

Everyone is welcome.

The blueprints that are used as a basis for the Marconi project can be found at https://blueprints.launchpad.net/marconi

Next meeting

We'll have an extra meeting this month to power through the API spec. Same bat time, same bat channel, on:

  • 14 Feb 2013

Agenda

  • Review actions from the last meeting
  • Continue reviewing each operations listed in the latest API draft.
  • Open discussion

Backlog

Stuff we want to talk about in a future meeting:

  • Audit river - should we do it, and if so, should it be an optional or mandatory part of the spec?
  • Storage drivers - the good, the bad, and the ugly
  • Delayed message delivery - use cases, what's the need, is it something we do now or later?
  • Supporting mobile devices, doing so securely (allowing mobile posts to a queue)
  • Authorization based on an API key generated for a specific app and a specific queue
  • Authentication in general
  • Max payload size - give people what they need but also want to encourage appropriate usage of the service

Previous meetings

  • Meeting #3 | PUT vs. PATCH, JSON vs. XML, and other discussions re the API draft. | 7 Feb 2013 | log | summary
  • Meeting #2 | Concrete queues, no tags, locking semantics, unified queue types or ? | 24 Jan 2013 | log | summary
  • Meeting #1 | Kickoff |17 Jan 2013 | log | summary

Meeting organizers