Jump to: navigation, search

Difference between revisions of "Meetings/TroveMeeting"

(Trove Meeting, July 08, 2015)
Line 21: Line 21:
 
* [SlickNik] Trove pulse update:
 
* [SlickNik] Trove pulse update:
 
** https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/trove-pulse-update
 
** https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/trove-pulse-update
 +
 +
* [amrith] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/189837/
 +
** To get to the bottom of the new/existing security hole.
  
 
* [amrith] Trove-compatible images creation automation
 
* [amrith] Trove-compatible images creation automation
 
** This was touched upon last week and some discussion ensued. I don't think a conclusion was reached so I'd like to see if we could reach some finality on this. Specifically, who's doing what? What is the proposed 'feature' or 'implementation', could we have a BP for this, or use the review process to discuss this, which we've found to be effective with BP's (when we moved away from the BP meeting), etc.,
 
** This was touched upon last week and some discussion ensued. I don't think a conclusion was reached so I'd like to see if we could reach some finality on this. Specifically, who's doing what? What is the proposed 'feature' or 'implementation', could we have a BP for this, or use the review process to discuss this, which we've found to be effective with BP's (when we moved away from the BP meeting), etc.,
 
* [amrith] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/189837/
 
** To get to the bottom of the new/existing security hole.
 
  
 
<br/>
 
<br/>

Revision as of 17:49, 8 July 2015

Weekly Trove Team Meeting

We have weekly team meetings on Wednesdays at 18:00 UTC in #openstack-meeting-alt

Want to add an agenda item? Please append your item to the upcoming weekly agenda while keeping in mind:

Guidelines for Writing Clear Agenda Items

An agenda item should have a clearly defined objective.

  • [owner/author/interested-party] Good: Review #xxxxx has comments on foobar.py from multiple folks and there seems to be a lack of consensus on how to solve problem ‘y’. Let’s quickly rehash the merits of both approaches in 2-5 minutes and call for a vote. Goal: choose an approach and move forward on implementation.
  • Bad: Discuss blueprint ‘xyz’
  • Bad: Revisit blueprint ‘abc’ that we talked about last week to get answers on remaining disagreements.


When referring to previous conversations or competing viewpoints, be sure to summarize them.

Please make sure to include your own name in the first line of the agenda item, or the name of the person who will be presenting the subject/leading the discussion.

Trove Meeting, July 08, 2015

  • [amrith] Trove-compatible images creation automation
    • This was touched upon last week and some discussion ensued. I don't think a conclusion was reached so I'd like to see if we could reach some finality on this. Specifically, who's doing what? What is the proposed 'feature' or 'implementation', could we have a BP for this, or use the review process to discuss this, which we've found to be effective with BP's (when we moved away from the BP meeting), etc.,


Meeting Agenda History
Meeting Chat Logs