Jump to: navigation, search

Difference between revisions of "Meetings/TroveMeeting"

(Agenda for February 25 2015)
(Agenda for February 25 2015)
Line 32: Line 32:
 
** Am hoping we can nail down a date.
 
** Am hoping we can nail down a date.
 
** Currently, week of August 24th is winning.
 
** Currently, week of August 24th is winning.
 +
* [sushilkm] Needed reviewers for Vertica work
 +
** Looking forward for people to look at the Vertica work, the spec, trove-integration and trove patches.
 +
** The list of patchsets for the work is as follows:
 +
# trove-specs: https://review.openstack.org/151126
 +
# trove-integration: https://review.openstack.org/156149
 +
# trove: https://review.openstack.org/156486
  
 
<br/>
 
<br/>

Revision as of 17:13, 25 February 2015

Weekly Trove Team Meeting

We have weekly team meetings on Wednesdays at 18:00 UTC in #openstack-meeting-alt

Want to add an agenda item? Please append your item to the upcoming weekly agenda while keeping in mind:

Guidelines for Writing Clear Agenda Items

An agenda item should have a clearly defined objective.

  • [owner/author/interested-party] Good: Review #xxxxx has comments on foobar.py from multiple folks and there seems to be a lack of consensus on how to solve problem ‘y’. Let’s quickly rehash the merits of both approaches in 2-5 minutes and call for a vote. Goal: choose an approach and move forward on implementation.
  • Bad: Discuss blueprint ‘xyz’
  • Bad: Revisit blueprint ‘abc’ that we talked about last week to get answers on remaining disagreements.


When referring to previous conversations or competing viewpoints, be sure to summarize them.

Please make sure to include your own name in the first line of the agenda item, or the name of the person who will be presenting the subject/leading the discussion.

Agenda for February 25 2015

  • Trove pulse update:
  • [amrith] Need reviewers for 157140 [1]
    • Would like to have people look at this and consider it for merging quickly as there are other patch sets that will be impacted by it, especially the one reorganizing the guestagent code, anything that wants to add a new datastore, etc.,
    • There have been some comments (Simon, Ashleigh, Sushil) that I've tried to address in a reply but I would like some positive (or negative) reviews. Ok, I'd like some positive reviews ;)
  • [doug] Discuss 147908 [2]
    • There are a couple of options for how to proceed on this change and it would be good to get it into Kilo-3.
  • [schang] Discuss 136918 [3]
    • Discuss the comment thread at point #3 under the Guest Agent section. Need to decide what to do with the common code.
  • [amrith] Trove Liberty Mid Cycle Sprint -- Initial planning
  • [sushilkm] Needed reviewers for Vertica work
    • Looking forward for people to look at the Vertica work, the spec, trove-integration and trove patches.
    • The list of patchsets for the work is as follows:
  1. trove-specs: https://review.openstack.org/151126
  2. trove-integration: https://review.openstack.org/156149
  3. trove: https://review.openstack.org/156486


Meeting Agenda History
Meeting Chat Logs