Revision as of 15:35, 5 November 2014

Weekly Trove Team Meeting

We have weekly team meetings on Wednesdays at 18:00 UTC in #openstack-meeting-alt

Want to add an agenda item? Please append your item to the upcoming weekly agenda while keeping in mind:

Guidelines for Writing Clear Agenda Items

An agenda item should have a clearly defined objective.

Good: Review #xxxxx has comments on foobar.py from multiple folks and there seems to be a lack of consensus on how to solve problem ‘y’. Let’s quickly rehash the merits of both approaches in 2-5 minutes and call for a vote. Goal: choose an approach and move forward on implementation.
Bad: Discuss blueprint ‘xyz’
Bad: Revisit blueprint ‘abc’ that we talked about last week to get answers on remaining disagreements.

When referring to previous conversations or competing viewpoints, be sure to summarize them.

Meeting CANCELED Nov 5th

OpenStack Kilo Summit

Meeting Chat Logs: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/trove/2014/
Meeting Agenda History: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Trove/MeetingAgendaHistory#Trove_Weekly_Meeting_Agenda_History

Note: BP Meetings now have their own wiki page at: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/TroveBPMeeting

@@ Line 15: / Line 15: @@
 When referring to previous conversations or competing viewpoints, be sure to summarize them.
-== Agenda for Oct 29th ==
+== Meeting CANCELED Nov 5th ==
-* [denis_makogon]
+* OpenStack Kilo Summit
-** https://review.openstack.org/#/c/102838/ - During bug discussion (using report comments) was made unformal decision to mark all running backups as FAILED if instance is being deleted. But this checkin was marked with -2 from Auston (for more info see checkin comments). I'd like to discuss it and find suitable way for all of us.
-** https://review.openstack.org/#/c/130519/ - As we are all know that incremental backup can silently be executed as full backup because there's no incremental strategy for given backup strategy. This fix aims to fix it. But Amrith keep voting with -1 because he thinks that fix can be shorter. More info you can find out checkin comments. My idea is to have common validation method that executes specific logic depending on operation type. So, i'd like to hear concrete feedback from other contributors and find suitable way to fix it.
-** https://gist.github.com/denismakogon/15561df6dc5ddc60ba74 - We need to find proper way to handle cluster extension procedure using CLI. Also, as it was discussed, once clustering is merged we might proceed with changing existing python-troveclient framework (for more information see GIST).
-* [amrith]
-** Since the meeting next monday (BP meeting) will likely be preempted by the summit in Paris, I'd like to get some focus on a blueprint to allow users to retrieve guest log files. Please review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/131610/. I have re-written this specification and (with her permission) listed Iccha as the mentor of the person who will be implementing this.
 <br /><br />

Difference between revisions of "Meetings/TroveMeeting"

Revision as of 15:35, 5 November 2014

Weekly Trove Team Meeting

Guidelines for Writing Clear Agenda Items

Meeting CANCELED Nov 5th