Revision as of 17:59, 11 June 2014

Weekly Trove Team Meeting

We have weekly team meetings on Wednesdays at 18:00 UTC in #openstack-meeting-alt

Want to add an agenda item? Please append your item to the upcoming weekly agenda while keeping in mind:

An agenda item should have a clearly defined objective.

Good: Review #xxxxx has comments on foobar.py from multiple folks and there seems to be a lack of consensus on how to solve problem ‘y’. Let’s quickly rehash the merits of both approaches in 2-5 minutes and call for a vote. Goal: choose an approach and move forward on implementation.
Bad: Discuss blueprint ‘xyz’
Bad: Revisit blueprint ‘abc’ that we talked about last week to get answers on remaining disagreements.

When referring to previous conversations or competing viewpoints, be sure to summarize them.

Code reviews summary + state of the gate
- We've been doing a better job with code reviews, but we still need more reviews (both from non-core and core!).
- Code Review summary for the last 30 days:
  - Total reviews: 542 (18.1 per day)
  - Total reviewers: 33 (0.5 per reviewer per day)
  - Total reviews by core team: 282 (9.4 per day)
  - Core team size: 6 (1.6 per core per day)
- RDJenkins gate is currently broken because image built doesn't use correct cloud-init data source
  - https://gist.github.com/anonymous/1cbeadc132736670c41c
  - steve-leon and slicknik investigating; likely due to https://review.openstack.org/#/c/95598/
FYI We cut the Juno-1 trove release! (SlickNik)
- https://bugs.launchpad.net/trove/+milestone/juno-1
- https://github.com/openstack/trove/releases/tag/2014.2.b1

@@ Line 15: / Line 15: @@
 When referring to previous conversations or competing viewpoints, be sure to summarize them.
-== Agenda for Jun 4 ==
+== Agenda for Jun 11 ==
 * Code reviews summary + state of the gate
 ** We've been doing a better job with code reviews, but we still need more reviews (both from non-core and core!).