Jump to: navigation, search

Difference between revisions of "Meetings/TroveMeeting"

(Trove Meeting, March 30, 2016)
(Trove Meeting, March 30, 2016)
Line 24: Line 24:
 
** cp16net reply to trove-dashboard ML question for RC2
 
** cp16net reply to trove-dashboard ML question for RC2
 
** [all] please review changes [ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/262289/], [ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/262287/], and link [ http://openstack.markmail.org/thread/jepcqu335mrb5c7l] in agenda and update the reviews
 
** [all] please review changes [ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/262289/], [ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/262287/], and link [ http://openstack.markmail.org/thread/jepcqu335mrb5c7l] in agenda and update the reviews
** flaper87 to WF+1 the patches in question [ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/262289/] and [ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/262287/]
+
** flaper87 to WF+1 the patches in question [ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/262289/] and [ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/262287/] [DONE]
 
* Trove pulse update
 
* Trove pulse update
 
** http://bit.ly/1VQyg00 [http://bit.ly/1VQyg00]
 
** http://bit.ly/1VQyg00 [http://bit.ly/1VQyg00]
 
* Announcements
 
* Announcements
** Newton release schedule has been published [http://releases.openstack.org/newton/schedule.html]
+
** [http://releases.openstack.org/newton/schedule.html Newton release schedule has been published ]
** Getting rid of eventlet and replacing it with something else [https://review.openstack.org/#/c/164035/]
+
*** Some things I've learned from the Mitaka cycle
 +
**** The schedule is known so far in advance that it is prudent to plan for it
 +
**** The dates for things that are listed as "Final" are in fact final and not subject to FFE's
 +
***** If we want to push any code into OSLO, R-6 is a hard deadline.
 +
***** R-5, is the '''hard''' freeze for the python-troveclient. We '''must''' get all new functionality we need in the client into a version by that date or it won't be available for the release.
 +
***** R-5 is the '''target date''' by which all new functionality should be in, you need to request FFE's for anything that does not merge by that date
 +
***** R-3 is the RC1 '''target date''', not a hard date. In the Mitaka cycle, I mistakenly believed that R-3 is a hard RC1 date. My mistake.
 +
** [https://review.openstack.org/#/c/164035/ Getting rid of eventlet and replacing it with something else]
 +
 
 +
* Ongoing review of projects. At the mid-cycle in Raleigh, one of the action items that we took away was that we should start tracking and monitoring all projects under way to completion through the release cycle. I'm going to start this up with the projects that we know are under way, and begin to highlight them so that people can focus time on reviewing them.
 +
** [pmackinn] [https://review.openstack.org/#/c/295274/ Separate trove image build project based on libguestfs tools]
 +
** [tellesnóbrega/vkmc] [https://review.openstack.org/#/c/256057/ Implementing CEPH as a backend for backups]
 +
** [sonali/vkmc] [https://review.openstack.org/#/c/263980/ Configuration Groups for Couchdb]
 +
** [johnma] [https://review.openstack.org/#/c/255437/ Enable CouchDB replication in Trove]
 +
** [amrith] [https://review.openstack.org/#/c/256079/ Add support for hbase in Trove]
 +
** [vgnbkr] [https://review.openstack.org/#/c/294213/ Multi-Region Support]
 
* Summit planning
 
* Summit planning
** '''Propose sessions at https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/trove-newton-proposed-sessions [https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/trove-newton-proposed-sessions]'''
+
** [https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/trove-newton-proposed-sessions Propose sessions for the summit]
 
** Conference room allocations announced (Trove: 3fb, 6wr, cm:half) [http://markmail.org/message/avbqqzwhog36tme2]
 
** Conference room allocations announced (Trove: 3fb, 6wr, cm:half) [http://markmail.org/message/avbqqzwhog36tme2]
* Projects for Newton
+
* Planning for mid-cycle
** I would like to get a sense for the things that are being worked on for Newton so we can start recording them in LP, having specs, and following up regularly on progress so we get features done in time.
+
** It seems like this is a long way off but it really isn't.
 +
** I'd like to propose R-7, in the New York City area.
 
* Open Discussion
 
* Open Discussion
  

Revision as of 11:38, 27 March 2016

Weekly Trove Team Meeting

We have weekly team meetings on Wednesdays at 18:00 UTC in #openstack-meeting-alt

Want to add an agenda item? Please append your item to the upcoming weekly agenda while keeping in mind:

Guidelines for Writing Clear Agenda Items

An agenda item should have a clearly defined objective.

  • [owner/author/interested-party] Good: Review #xxxxx has comments on foobar.py from multiple folks and there seems to be a lack of consensus on how to solve problem ‘y’. Let’s quickly rehash the merits of both approaches in 2-5 minutes and call for a vote. Goal: choose an approach and move forward on implementation.
  • Bad: Discuss blueprint ‘xyz’
  • Bad: Revisit blueprint ‘abc’ that we talked about last week to get answers on remaining disagreements.


When referring to previous conversations or competing viewpoints, be sure to summarize them.

Please make sure to include your own name in the first line of the agenda item, or the name of the person who will be presenting the subject/leading the discussion.

Trove Meeting, March 30, 2016


Meeting Agenda History
Meeting Chat Logs

Running The Meeting

  • To start the meeting, use #startmeeting trove
  • Then, publish the link to the agenda for the meeting (this page).
  • Use #topic to mark each topic change.
  • You can find the near-full list of Meetbot commands here. Instructions for voting (which can be useful for a quick show of hands) live here.
  • During the meeting, don't forget to liberally use #info, #agreed, #action or #link to make sure the critical discussion points will be highlighted in the meeting log. Attendees can use these Meetbot keywords as well.
  • To end the meeting, use #endmeeting