Jump to: navigation, search

Difference between revisions of "Meetings/TechnicalCommittee/Ceilometer Gap Coverage"

(Concern #5: lack of participation in Grenade-based upgrade testing)
Line 45: Line 45:
 
=== Concern #5: lack of participation in Grenade-based upgrade testing ===
 
=== Concern #5: lack of participation in Grenade-based upgrade testing ===
 
* Actions:
 
* Actions:
** grenade integration is fairly clear, no need for an explicit summit design session
+
# ceilometer services included in the existing grenade sequencing
** clarity on extrinsic versus instrinsic goals of ceilometer upgrade testing: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-tc/2014-April/000632.html
+
# ceilometer-specific assertions on resource survivability in "javelin2"
 
* Drivers: emilienm/cdent
 
* Drivers: emilienm/cdent
 
* Milestone targets:
 
* Milestone targets:
** Substantial progress by: juno-1
+
** Phase1 to be completed by: juno-1
** Completed by: juno-2
+
** Phase2 to be completed by: juno-2
* Status: '''in progress'''
+
* Status: '''phase1 completed, phase2 in-progress'''

Revision as of 09:51, 14 June 2014

Concern #1: lack of an explicit project mission statement

  • Actions:
  • Driver: eglynn
  • Milestone targets:
    • Completed by: juno-1
  • Status: completed

Concern #2: lack of user- and operator-oriented documentation

Concern #3: lack of coverage in integration tests

Concern #4: lack of production-readiness of sqlalchemy driver

Concern #5: lack of participation in Grenade-based upgrade testing

  • Actions:
  1. ceilometer services included in the existing grenade sequencing
  2. ceilometer-specific assertions on resource survivability in "javelin2"
  • Drivers: emilienm/cdent
  • Milestone targets:
    • Phase1 to be completed by: juno-1
    • Phase2 to be completed by: juno-2
  • Status: phase1 completed, phase2 in-progress