Jump to: navigation, search

Difference between revisions of "Meetings/TechnicalCommittee"

m
Line 4: Line 4:
  
 
=== Current proposals ===
 
=== Current proposals ===
''Status last updated: May 22, 2017''
+
''Status last updated: May 24, 2017''
  
 
'''Leadership'''
 
'''Leadership'''
Line 11: Line 11:
 
** Status: Feedback was collected on draft review, ML and anonymous survey
 
** Status: Feedback was collected on draft review, ML and anonymous survey
 
** Next step: feedback needs to be distilled into actionable points (and split between cosmetic and significant changes).
 
** Next step: feedback needs to be distilled into actionable points (and split between cosmetic and significant changes).
* Introduce assert:supports-api-compatibility tag [https://review.openstack.org/418010] (mtreinish, sdague)
+
* Introduce assert:supports-api-interoperability tag [https://review.openstack.org/418010] (mtreinish, sdague)
** Status: Dependency was approved. New revision needed.
+
** Status: New revision posted May 22, might need another revision
** Next step: sdague to follow up with mtreinish to see if he will push it to the end
 
* Add tag assert:never-breaks-compat [https://review.openstack.org/446561] (mordred)
 
** Status: New revision needed
 
** Next step: ttx to follow up with mordred to see if he will push it to the end
 
 
* Describe what upstream support means [https://review.openstack.org/440601] (johnthetubaguy)
 
* Describe what upstream support means [https://review.openstack.org/440601] (johnthetubaguy)
 
** Status: New revision needed
 
** Status: New revision needed
 
** Next step: johnthetubaguy to update it next week-ish
 
** Next step: johnthetubaguy to update it next week-ish
* ''Publish official "help wanted" list (ttx, dims)''
+
* Introduce Top 5 help wanted list [https://review.openstack.org/#/c/466684/] (ttx, dims)
** ''Status: to be proposed''
+
** Status: Gathering initial feedback on proposal
 +
* Etcd as a base service [https://review.openstack.org/467436] (dims)
 +
** Status: Initial discussion on the review
  
  
 
'''New project teams'''
 
'''New project teams'''
 
* Add Stackube project team [https://review.openstack.org/462460] (dims, ttx)
 
* Add Stackube project team [https://review.openstack.org/462460] (dims, ttx)
** Status: Under discussion in the review. Needs to be set up as a hosted project before a final decision can be made.
+
** Status: Frozen until the project is set up as a hosted project and openly collaborates there for some time
 +
** Next step: Setting up openstack/stackube as an OpenStack-hosted project (dims to mentor them through the steps)
 
* Add Gluon project team [https://review.openstack.org/463069] (?)
 
* Add Gluon project team [https://review.openstack.org/463069] (?)
** Status: Under discussion in the review. Some answers missing. Needs a sponsor to help it through.
+
** Status: Frozen while Gluon discusses further integration opportunities with Neutron
 +
** Next step: This prospective team needs a TC sponsor/mentor to help them through the steps. Any volunteer ?
  
  
Line 36: Line 36:
 
** Document lack of postgresql support [https://review.openstack.org/465589] (cdent)
 
** Document lack of postgresql support [https://review.openstack.org/465589] (cdent)
 
** ML thread: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-May/116642.html
 
** ML thread: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-May/116642.html
** Status: Discussion / refining exact wording (no consensus yet)
+
** Status: No consensus yet, and energy is running low on pushing subsequent refinement patchsets
 +
** Next step: Might need a sync discussion in a meeting to lean one way or the other
 
* ''Culling projects that are not going anywhere (ttx, ?)''
 
* ''Culling projects that are not going anywhere (ttx, ?)''
 
** ''Status: brainstorming''
 
** ''Status: brainstorming''
Line 42: Line 43:
  
 
'''Inclusion & Diversity'''
 
'''Inclusion & Diversity'''
 +
* How to propose changes: do not mention meetings [https://review.openstack.org/467255] (ttx)
 +
** Status: Small doc catchup change. Voting in progress
 
* Decisions should be globally inclusive [https://review.openstack.org/460946] (johnthetubaguy)
 
* Decisions should be globally inclusive [https://review.openstack.org/460946] (johnthetubaguy)
 
** Status: New revision needed
 
** Status: New revision needed
 
** Next step: johnthetubaguy to update it
 
** Next step: johnthetubaguy to update it
* Stop requiring public IRC meetings [https://review.openstack.org/462077] (johnthetubaguy)
 
** Status: Majority reached on May 19. About to be approved (May 23).
 
 
* Document voting process for `formal-vote` patches [https://review.openstack.org/463141] (flaper87)
 
* Document voting process for `formal-vote` patches [https://review.openstack.org/463141] (flaper87)
** Status: Discussion still in progress, probably needs another patchset
+
** Status: New patchset posted on May 22, voting in progress (needs 66%)
 
* Drop Technical Committee meetings [https://review.openstack.org/459848] (flaper87)
 
* Drop Technical Committee meetings [https://review.openstack.org/459848] (flaper87)
 
** Status: New revision needed
 
** Status: New revision needed
 
** Next step: flaper87 to update it
 
** Next step: flaper87 to update it
* ''Setting up TC discussion channel and defining office hours (dims, ttx)''
+
* Office hours -- two patches:
** ''Status: to be proposed''
+
** Introduce office hours [https://review.openstack.org/#/c/467256/] (ttx)
 +
** Establish a #openstack-tc water cooler channel [https://review.openstack.org/#/c/467386/] (dims)
 +
** Status: initial discussion on the reviews
 
* ''Workgroups should not be UC or TC-side, should always be both (mrhillsman, ttx)''
 
* ''Workgroups should not be UC or TC-side, should always be both (mrhillsman, ttx)''
 
** ''Status: brainstorming''
 
** ''Status: brainstorming''
Line 60: Line 63:
 
'''Queens goals'''
 
'''Queens goals'''
 
* Add Queens goal split out tempest plugins [https://review.openstack.org/369749] (mtreinish)
 
* Add Queens goal split out tempest plugins [https://review.openstack.org/369749] (mtreinish)
** Status: New patchset posted on May 17. Voting in progress.
+
** Status: Majority reached on May 23. About to be approved (May 26)
  
  

Revision as of 11:23, 24 May 2017


The OpenStack Technical Committee is one of the governing bodies of the OpenStack project. You can find more information about it, such as the list of its current members or its governance charter, on the OpenStack TC governance website at https://governance.openstack.org/tc/ . It meets weekly in an open meeting in the #openstack-meeting IRC channel on Freenode. See the governance website for details on how to propose governance changes.

Current proposals

Status last updated: May 24, 2017

Leadership

  • Technical Committee vision [1] (gothicmindfood, johnthetubaguy, cdent, dtroyer)
  • Introduce assert:supports-api-interoperability tag [2] (mtreinish, sdague)
    • Status: New revision posted May 22, might need another revision
  • Describe what upstream support means [3] (johnthetubaguy)
    • Status: New revision needed
    • Next step: johnthetubaguy to update it next week-ish
  • Introduce Top 5 help wanted list [4] (ttx, dims)
    • Status: Gathering initial feedback on proposal
  • Etcd as a base service [5] (dims)
    • Status: Initial discussion on the review


New project teams

  • Add Stackube project team [6] (dims, ttx)
    • Status: Frozen until the project is set up as a hosted project and openly collaborates there for some time
    • Next step: Setting up openstack/stackube as an OpenStack-hosted project (dims to mentor them through the steps)
  • Add Gluon project team [7] (?)
    • Status: Frozen while Gluon discusses further integration opportunities with Neutron
    • Next step: This prospective team needs a TC sponsor/mentor to help them through the steps. Any volunteer ?


Simplification

  • postgresql support in OpenStack -- two alternative solutions:
  • Culling projects that are not going anywhere (ttx, ?)
    • Status: brainstorming


Inclusion & Diversity

  • How to propose changes: do not mention meetings [10] (ttx)
    • Status: Small doc catchup change. Voting in progress
  • Decisions should be globally inclusive [11] (johnthetubaguy)
    • Status: New revision needed
    • Next step: johnthetubaguy to update it
  • Document voting process for `formal-vote` patches [12] (flaper87)
    • Status: New patchset posted on May 22, voting in progress (needs 66%)
  • Drop Technical Committee meetings [13] (flaper87)
    • Status: New revision needed
    • Next step: flaper87 to update it
  • Office hours -- two patches:
    • Introduce office hours [14] (ttx)
    • Establish a #openstack-tc water cooler channel [15] (dims)
    • Status: initial discussion on the reviews
  • Workgroups should not be UC or TC-side, should always be both (mrhillsman, ttx)
    • Status: brainstorming


Queens goals

  • Add Queens goal split out tempest plugins [16] (mtreinish)
    • Status: Majority reached on May 23. About to be approved (May 26)


Other

  • Fix comment about design summits [17] (jhesketh, ttx)
    • Status: Majority reached on May 19, about to be approved (May 25)
  • Support "Driver teams" [18] [19] [20] [21] (dhellmann)
    • Status: Frozen while thingee works on driver discoverability
  • networking-cisco project team addition [22] (thingee)
    • Status: Blocked until driver teams are a thing
    • Next step: thingee to reach out to networking-cisco folks to check how much discoverability solves their issue
  • Policy on binary images publication (dhellmann)


Next Meeting

  • Date: tbd
  • Chair: tbd


Agenda

  • tbd


Apologies for Absence

  • tbd


Past meetings logs

Logs of past TC meetings can be accessed at: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/tc