Jump to: navigation, search

Difference between revisions of "Meetings/TechnicalCommittee"

Line 12: Line 12:
 
==== Agenda ====
 
==== Agenda ====
  
 +
* Appointed PTLs for Newton [https://review.openstack.org/296360]
 
* Remove rolling-upgrade tag from swift/ceilometer [https://review.openstack.org/292334]
 
* Remove rolling-upgrade tag from swift/ceilometer [https://review.openstack.org/292334]
 
* Update Kuryr mission statement [https://review.openstack.org/289993]
 
* Update Kuryr mission statement [https://review.openstack.org/289993]
Line 22: Line 23:
 
** Modify asserts for upgrades to include deployment [https://review.openstack.org/295529]
 
** Modify asserts for upgrades to include deployment [https://review.openstack.org/295529]
 
** Introduce a type:packaging tag [https://review.openstack.org/295971]
 
** Introduce a type:packaging tag [https://review.openstack.org/295971]
* Call out GPL style licenses in testing/validation. [https://review.openstack.org/293140] (if not approved yet)
 
* Appointed PTLs for Newton [https://review.openstack.org/296360] (if not approved yet)
 
 
* Open discussion
 
* Open discussion
  
Line 30: Line 29:
 
These items have been proposed, but are not put on the agenda just yet. Could be that they have not been discussed on openstack-dev for the time mandated by our charter yet, or are blocked for some other reason, or are just delayed while we process the earlier requests backlog:
 
These items have been proposed, but are not put on the agenda just yet. Could be that they have not been discussed on openstack-dev for the time mandated by our charter yet, or are blocked for some other reason, or are just delayed while we process the earlier requests backlog:
  
 +
* Call out GPL style licenses in testing/validation. [https://review.openstack.org/293140] (pending an update)
 
* Change mission statement by recent change [https://review.openstack.org/292610] (pending board decision)
 
* Change mission statement by recent change [https://review.openstack.org/292610] (pending board decision)
 +
* Retire the kite/python-kiteclient projects [https://review.openstack.org/297803] (not submitted in time for this meeting)
  
  

Revision as of 10:46, 28 March 2016


The OpenStack Technical Committee is one of the governing bodies of the OpenStack project. You can find more information about it, such as the list of its current members or its governance charter, on the OpenStack governance website at http://governance.openstack.org . It meets weekly in an open meeting in the #openstack-meeting IRC channel on Freenode.


Next Meeting

  • March 29th, 20:00 UTC
  • Chair: Thierry Carrez (ttx)


Agenda

  • Appointed PTLs for Newton [1]
  • Remove rolling-upgrade tag from swift/ceilometer [2]
  • Update Kuryr mission statement [3]
  • Changes to clarify project election requirements
    • Add leaderless programs amendment for inactivity [4]
    • Mention in project requirements about ptl election [5]
  • Stale cross-project specs (thingee) [6]
  • Tags to describe deployment and packaging deliverables
    • Introduce type:deployment tag [7]
    • Modify asserts for upgrades to include deployment [8]
    • Introduce a type:packaging tag [9]
  • Open discussion


Backlog

These items have been proposed, but are not put on the agenda just yet. Could be that they have not been discussed on openstack-dev for the time mandated by our charter yet, or are blocked for some other reason, or are just delayed while we process the earlier requests backlog:

  • Call out GPL style licenses in testing/validation. [10] (pending an update)
  • Change mission statement by recent change [11] (pending board decision)
  • Retire the kite/python-kiteclient projects [12] (not submitted in time for this meeting)


Apologies for Absence

  • tbd


Proposing discussion topics, motions or other governance changes before the TC

Motions need to be presented before Friday 0800 UTC to be added to the next Tuesday meeting agenda for discussion. They should either be posted as a proposed change to the governance repository (on review.openstack.org) or as a "[tc]" thread to openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org, with a pointer to that thread should be posted to openstack-tc@lists.openstack.org to make sure it gets the required attention from TC members. Upon verification, the TC Chair will put the motion on the agenda for the next meeting.

Before being finally voted on, motions will have to be presented as a governance change. As mandated by our charter, the vote on motions won't be closed until we spent a minimum of 4 business days of public discussions, to give a chance to our wider community to chime in on proposed changes.

Additions of code repositories to existing project teams, as well as other instances of governance repository housekeeping, do not constitute a "motion". Those will be approved a week after being proposed, if they have the required approvals (PTLs in the case of a repository addition) and no TC member -1 vote. A -1 vote will result in the proposed change to be reviewed at the next TC meeting.


Past meetings logs

Logs of past TC meetings can be accessed at: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/tc