Jump to: navigation, search

Difference between revisions of "Meetings/TechnicalCommittee"

Line 17: Line 17:
 
* Applies naming guidelines to service object [https://review.openstack.org/201670]
 
* Applies naming guidelines to service object [https://review.openstack.org/201670]
 
* New projects have to meet all existing policies. [https://review.openstack.org/201766]
 
* New projects have to meet all existing policies. [https://review.openstack.org/201766]
 +
* Introduce the "deliverables" concept [https://review.openstack.org/202583]
 
* Workgroup reports
 
* Workgroup reports
 
* Open discussion
 
* Open discussion
Line 24: Line 25:
 
These items have been proposed, but are not put on the agenda just yet. Could be that they have not been discussed on openstack-dev for the time mandated by our charter yet, or are blocked for some other reason, or are just delayed while we process the earlier requests backlog:
 
These items have been proposed, but are not put on the agenda just yet. Could be that they have not been discussed on openstack-dev for the time mandated by our charter yet, or are blocked for some other reason, or are just delayed while we process the earlier requests backlog:
  
 +
* OpenStack/user-stories repository for Product Working group [https://review.openstack.org/197754] (pending application to user-committee repos)
 
* Add GSLB as an experimental project [https://review.openstack.org/201683] (postponing until we approve Stackforge retirement)
 
* Add GSLB as an experimental project [https://review.openstack.org/201683] (postponing until we approve Stackforge retirement)
 
* Fix typo to 'Bare metal service' [https://review.openstack.org/194230] (agentle driving it, likely to be abandoned)
 
* Fix typo to 'Bare metal service' [https://review.openstack.org/194230] (agentle driving it, likely to be abandoned)
 
* Adds Debian & derivatives packaging to OpenStack [https://review.openstack.org/185187] (pending narrowing of scope to Debian-only)
 
* Adds Debian & derivatives packaging to OpenStack [https://review.openstack.org/185187] (pending narrowing of scope to Debian-only)
* Ironic is considering changing their release cycle [https://review.openstack.org/185203] (needs rebase and using new tags)
+
* Ironic is considering changing their release cycle [https://review.openstack.org/185203] (to be abandoned, superseded by other patch)
 
* Add Compass to OpenStack Projects [https://review.openstack.org/196973] (learning more of the OpenStack Way)
 
* Add Compass to OpenStack Projects [https://review.openstack.org/196973] (learning more of the OpenStack Way)
* Add Fuel to OpenStack Projects [https://review.openstack.org/199232] (waiting for ML discussion threads)
+
* Add Fuel to OpenStack Projects [https://review.openstack.org/199232] (needs more collaboration, waiting for ML discussion threads)
 
* [WIP] Add Akanda to OpenStack Projects List [https://review.openstack.org/194892] (marked WIP)
 
* [WIP] Add Akanda to OpenStack Projects List [https://review.openstack.org/194892] (marked WIP)
 
* [WIP] Added JavaScript to Common Testing Interface [https://review.openstack.org/195240] (marked WIP)
 
* [WIP] Added JavaScript to Common Testing Interface [https://review.openstack.org/195240] (marked WIP)

Revision as of 12:48, 17 July 2015


The OpenStack Technical Committee is one of the governing bodies of the OpenStack project. You can find more information about it, such as the list of its current members or its governance charter, on the OpenStack governance website at http://governance.openstack.org . It meets weekly in an open meeting in the #openstack-meeting IRC channel on Freenode.


Next Meeting

  • July 21st, 20:00 UTC
  • Chair: Thierry Carrez (ttx) [unless conference wifi sucks]


Agenda

  • Add Stackforge Retirement resolution [1]
  • Add the "OpenStack UX" Project: [2]
  • Adds guidelines for project and service names [3]
  • Applies naming guidelines to service object [4]
  • New projects have to meet all existing policies. [5]
  • Introduce the "deliverables" concept [6]
  • Workgroup reports
  • Open discussion


Backlog

These items have been proposed, but are not put on the agenda just yet. Could be that they have not been discussed on openstack-dev for the time mandated by our charter yet, or are blocked for some other reason, or are just delayed while we process the earlier requests backlog:

  • OpenStack/user-stories repository for Product Working group [7] (pending application to user-committee repos)
  • Add GSLB as an experimental project [8] (postponing until we approve Stackforge retirement)
  • Fix typo to 'Bare metal service' [9] (agentle driving it, likely to be abandoned)
  • Adds Debian & derivatives packaging to OpenStack [10] (pending narrowing of scope to Debian-only)
  • Ironic is considering changing their release cycle [11] (to be abandoned, superseded by other patch)
  • Add Compass to OpenStack Projects [12] (learning more of the OpenStack Way)
  • Add Fuel to OpenStack Projects [13] (needs more collaboration, waiting for ML discussion threads)
  • [WIP] Add Akanda to OpenStack Projects List [14] (marked WIP)
  • [WIP] Added JavaScript to Common Testing Interface [15] (marked WIP)
  • WIP - Add Group Based Policy Project [16] (marked WIP)
  • WIP - add some tags describing roles [17] (marked WIP)


Apologies for Absence

  • tbd


Proposing discussion topics, motions or other governance changes before the TC

Motions need to be presented before Friday 0800 UTC to be added to the next Tuesday meeting agenda for discussion. They should either be posted as a proposed change to the governance repository (on review.openstack.org) or as a "[tc]" thread to openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org, with a pointer to that thread should be posted to openstack-tc@lists.openstack.org to make sure it gets the required attention from TC members. Upon verification, the TC Chair will put the motion on the agenda for the next meeting.

Before being finally voted on, motions will have to be presented as a governance change. As mandated by our charter, the vote on motions won't be closed until we spent a minimum of 4 business days of public discussions, to give a chance to our wider community to chime in on proposed changes.

Additions of code repositories to existing project teams, as well as other instances of governance repository housekeeping, do not constitute a "motion". Those will be approved a week after being proposed, if they have the required approvals (PTLs in the case of a repository addition) and no TC member -1 vote. A -1 vote will result in the proposed change to be reviewed at the next TC meeting.


Past meetings logs

Logs of past TC meetings can be accessed at: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/tc