Difference between revisions of "Meetings/Swift"
< Meetings
David Hadas (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
* pbr: good? bad? (ugly?) Currently it's in python-swiftclient. Do we want to make Swift use pbr, or back the change out of swiftclient? | * pbr: good? bad? (ugly?) Currently it's in python-swiftclient. Do we want to make Swift use pbr, or back the change out of swiftclient? | ||
* openstack-hacking: good? bad? cf: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/33861/ (chmouel) | * openstack-hacking: good? bad? cf: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/33861/ (chmouel) | ||
+ | * Smallest Swift Configuration (davidhadas) | ||
+ | - Where do we stand on this? | ||
+ | - Growth path from smallest to very big (having a suggested one can help ensure we do not step on deployers' toes) | ||
+ | * Placement Control Middleware (davidhadas) | ||
+ | - Combining multiple clusters (extending cluster sync) - collecting first thoughts about this suggested extension | ||
+ | - See https://blueprints.launchpad.net/swift/+spec/cluster-sync-policy | ||
+ | * Others: | ||
+ | - Directory storage - can we move forward with this? |
Revision as of 13:34, 26 June 2013
Meeting Time: Every other Wednesday at 19:00 UTC
Next Meeting: Wednesday, June 26
Agenda items:
- Quick poll: who's going to the Hong Kong design summit? (torgomatic)
- pbr: good? bad? (ugly?) Currently it's in python-swiftclient. Do we want to make Swift use pbr, or back the change out of swiftclient?
- openstack-hacking: good? bad? cf: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/33861/ (chmouel)
- Smallest Swift Configuration (davidhadas)
- Where do we stand on this? - Growth path from smallest to very big (having a suggested one can help ensure we do not step on deployers' toes)
- Placement Control Middleware (davidhadas)
- Combining multiple clusters (extending cluster sync) - collecting first thoughts about this suggested extension - See https://blueprints.launchpad.net/swift/+spec/cluster-sync-policy
- Others:
- Directory storage - can we move forward with this?