Difference between revisions of "Meetings/Swift"
< Meetings
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
** Composite rings - how best to expose composite ring building as CLI? | ** Composite rings - how best to expose composite ring building as CLI? | ||
*** etherpad https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/composite_rings | *** etherpad https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/composite_rings | ||
| − | * nightly gate stable branch failures [timburke] | + | * Idea: call your patches |
| − | * assert:never-breaks-compat TC resolution | + | * FYI stuff |
| − | ** https://review.openstack.org/#/c/446561/ | + | ** nightly gate stable branch failures [timburke] |
| − | ** do we want to assert this for Swift? | + | ** assert:never-breaks-compat TC resolution |
| + | *** https://review.openstack.org/#/c/446561/ | ||
| + | *** do we want to assert this for Swift? | ||
* Open Discussion | * Open Discussion | ||
Revision as of 22:20, 20 March 2017
| Meeting Time | Every Wednesday at 21:00 UTC in #openstack-meeting |
| Meeting Logs | http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/swift/2017/ |
| Chair | notmyname |
Next meeting: March 22, 2017 2100 UTC
- Follow-up from last week
- Undelete accounts patch, needs eyes from a "new API" perspective. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/445160/
- https://review.openstack.org/#/c/444604/ closes critical bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/swift/+bug/1657246
- Composite rings - how best to expose composite ring building as CLI?
- Idea: call your patches
- FYI stuff
- nightly gate stable branch failures [timburke]
- assert:never-breaks-compat TC resolution
- https://review.openstack.org/#/c/446561/
- do we want to assert this for Swift?
- Open Discussion
Notes left from earlier
- Things happening in Swift
- golang object server
- global ec
- composite rings
- policy migration
- policy auto tiering
- sync to elasticsearch
- container sharding
- symlinks
- increase part power
- container sharding
When adding an item, please include your IRC nickname with it.
