Jump to: navigation, search

Difference between revisions of "Meetings/Swift"

(37 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
 
! '''2100 UTC Meeting'''
 
! '''2100 UTC Meeting'''
 
|-
 
|-
| '''Next meeting:''' Jun 10, 2020
+
| '''Next meeting:''' January 20th, 2021
 
|-
 
|-
 
| '''Chair:''' timburke
 
| '''Chair:''' timburke
Line 9: Line 9:
 
|
 
|
 
<!-- List 2100UTC meeting items below here -->
 
<!-- List 2100UTC meeting items below here -->
* Gate status
+
* Reconciler/EC/encryption interactions
** uWSGI/grenade breakage
+
** https://bugs.launchpad.net/swift/+bug/1910804
*** http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2020-June/015432.html
+
** https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/swift/+/770522
** pip/probe tests breakage
+
* SSYNC and non-durable frags
*** http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2020-June/015425.html
+
** https://bugs.launchpad.net/swift/+bug/1778002
*** https://review.opendev.org/#/c/735992
+
** https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/swift/+/770047
* Memcache and container failures
+
* Cleaning up shards when root DB is deleted and reclaimed
** https://bugs.launchpad.net/swift/+bug/1883211
+
** https://bugs.launchpad.net/swift/+bug/1911232
** https://review.opendev.org/#/c/735359/
+
** https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/swift/+/770529
* Background daemons and replication servers
+
* Relinker issues
** https://launchpad.net/bugs/1883302 - sharder sends ranges over same network used for client-facing requests
+
** https://bugs.launchpad.net/swift/+bug/1910589 - Multiple part power increases leads to misplaced data
** https://review.opendev.org/#/c/735751/ - fix just sharder sending ranges
+
*** https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/swift/+/769855
** https://review.opendev.org/#/c/735991/ - make it configurable via header in direct/internal client (keeping current behavior as default)
+
** https://bugs.launchpad.net/swift/+bug/1910470 - swift-object-relinker does not handle unmounted disks well
** can/should we change the default behavior to prefer replication network? what other utilities have people written using these clients? would client or replication network be more appropriate?
+
*** https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/swift/+/769632
* Updates
 
** Waterfall EC (clayg)
 
*** https://review.opendev.org/#/c/733911/ - split EC / replicated
 
*** https://review.opendev.org/#/c/711342/ - concurrent frag fetcher
 
** LOSF updates (alecuyer, rledisez)
 
*** https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Swift/ideas/small_files/implementation#LOSF_v2
 
 
<!--
 
<!--
** jerasure support in libec
+
** jerasure support in pyeclib/libec
 
-->
 
-->
 
 
<!-- End 2100UTC meeting items -->
 
<!-- End 2100UTC meeting items -->
 
|}
 
|}
Line 38: Line 31:
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
{| class="wikitable"
 
|-
 
|-
| '''Meeting Logs''' || http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/swift/2020/
+
| '''Meeting Logs''' || http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/swift/2021/
 
|-
 
|-
 
|'''Useful Commands'''|| #link #info #agreed #topic and #startmeeting
 
|'''Useful Commands'''|| #link #info #agreed #topic and #startmeeting

Revision as of 20:35, 20 January 2021

2100 UTC Meeting
Next meeting: January 20th, 2021
Chair: timburke
Meeting Logs http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/swift/2021/
Useful Commands #link #info #agreed #topic and #startmeeting

When adding an item, please include your IRC nickname with it.