Jump to: navigation, search

Difference between revisions of "Meetings/Solum"

(Previous Meetings)
(Weekly Solum Team Meeting)
Line 7: Line 7:
 
! Meeting Date !! Meeting Time !! Local Time
 
! Meeting Date !! Meeting Time !! Local Time
 
|-
 
|-
| 2015-01-06 || UTC 2100 Tuesday || http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=Containers+Team+Meeting&iso=20150106T21
+
| 2015-01-27 || UTC 2100 Tuesday || http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=Containers+Team+Meeting&iso=20150127T21
 
|-
 
|-
| 2015-01-13 || UTC 2100 Tuesday || http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=Containers+Team+Meeting&iso=20150113T21
+
| 2015-02-03 || UTC 2100 Tuesday || http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=Containers+Team+Meeting&iso=20150203T21
 
|-
 
|-
| 2015-01-20 || UTC 2100 Tuesday || http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=Containers+Team+Meeting&iso=20150120T21
+
| 2015-02-10 || UTC 2100 Tuesday || http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=Containers+Team+Meeting&iso=20150210T21
 
|}
 
|}
  
 
Please feel free to add items to the agenda below with your name and we'll cover them.
 
Please feel free to add items to the agenda below with your name and we'll cover them.
  
== Agenda for 2015-01-13 2100 UTC ==
+
== Agenda for 2015-01-27 2100 UTC ==
  
 
* '''Roll Call'''
 
* '''Roll Call'''
 
* '''Announcements'''
 
* '''Announcements'''
 +
** adrian_otto away on 2015-02-17. Should we skip our team meeting that day, or assign a pro-tem chair?
 
* '''Review Action Items'''
 
* '''Review Action Items'''
  ** ACTION: adrian_otto to follow up with mistral devs to arrange a tagged release that we can use as a stable dependency.
+
** ACTION: adrian_otto to follow up with mistral devs to arrange a tagged release that we can use as a stable dependency.
 +
* '''Same-host check for plans'''
 +
** Excerpt from #solum from datson180b: 1. if we only want same-host plans, why not just switch to a name-or-uuid scheme for plans 2. if we accept planfiles from elsewhere (how can we refer to plans that don't live in our db?) then why bother registering the plans ahead of time at all since the first thing to be done is to parse that planfile into a plan. The way i see it either that same-host check needs to go or the use of urls needs to. on that note, notice how the resource at that url isn't actually used, the url is just parsed so http://complete-valid-solum-host.com/gibberish/this/isnt/a/valid/path/<legit plan uuid>/ WORKS
 
* '''Blueprint/Task Review'''
 
* '''Blueprint/Task Review'''
** Change 'app' commands to 'plan' commands
 
    ** https://review.openstack.org/#/c/146607/
 
** Needs approval from a core:
 
  ** https://review.openstack.org/#/c/115687/
 
  ** https://review.openstack.org/#/c/115686/
 
  ** https://review.openstack.org/#/c/115684/
 
 
 
* '''Open Discussion'''
 
* '''Open Discussion'''
  

Revision as of 18:09, 27 January 2015

Weekly Solum Team Meeting

If you're interested in Solum, we hold public meetings weekly in #openstack-meeting-alt on freenode.

Meeting Date Meeting Time Local Time
2015-01-27 UTC 2100 Tuesday http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=Containers+Team+Meeting&iso=20150127T21
2015-02-03 UTC 2100 Tuesday http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=Containers+Team+Meeting&iso=20150203T21
2015-02-10 UTC 2100 Tuesday http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=Containers+Team+Meeting&iso=20150210T21

Please feel free to add items to the agenda below with your name and we'll cover them.

Agenda for 2015-01-27 2100 UTC

  • Roll Call
  • Announcements
    • adrian_otto away on 2015-02-17. Should we skip our team meeting that day, or assign a pro-tem chair?
  • Review Action Items
    • ACTION: adrian_otto to follow up with mistral devs to arrange a tagged release that we can use as a stable dependency.
  • Same-host check for plans
    • Excerpt from #solum from datson180b: 1. if we only want same-host plans, why not just switch to a name-or-uuid scheme for plans 2. if we accept planfiles from elsewhere (how can we refer to plans that don't live in our db?) then why bother registering the plans ahead of time at all since the first thing to be done is to parse that planfile into a plan. The way i see it either that same-host check needs to go or the use of urls needs to. on that note, notice how the resource at that url isn't actually used, the url is just parsed so http://complete-valid-solum-host.com/gibberish/this/isnt/a/valid/path/<legit plan uuid>/ WORKS
  • Blueprint/Task Review
  • Open Discussion

Agenda Template

  • Roll Call
  • Announcements
  • Review Action Items
  • Blueprint/Task Review
  • Open Discussion

Previous Meetings