Difference between revisions of "Meetings/NeutronDrivers"
< Meetings
(→Agenda) |
(→Agenda) |
||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
* On Demand agenda: | * On Demand agenda: | ||
** (slaweq) Should we expose propagate_uplink_status field to all ports? Review: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/571899/ | ** (slaweq) Should we expose propagate_uplink_status field to all ports? Review: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/571899/ | ||
| + | ** (ralonsoh) Should we add a new extension just to modify an integer parameter validation? Reduce the port range from 0-64K to 1-64K. This change is trivial and both APIs (new/old) can coexist without any clash. Review: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/613562/ | ||
== Previous meeting logs == | == Previous meeting logs == | ||
* Previous meetings, with their notes and logs, can be found [http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/neutron_drivers/ here]. | * Previous meetings, with their notes and logs, can be found [http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/neutron_drivers/ here]. | ||
Revision as of 10:44, 2 November 2018
The Neutron Drivers Team (Neutron Drivers) holds public meetings as advertised on OpenStack IRC Meetings Calendar. If you are unable to attend, please check the most recent logs.
Agenda
- Ongoing discussions:
- To be vetted for discussion:
- To be screened:
- Approved RFE's:
- Other RFE's:
- On Demand agenda:
- (slaweq) Should we expose propagate_uplink_status field to all ports? Review: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/571899/
- (ralonsoh) Should we add a new extension just to modify an integer parameter validation? Reduce the port range from 0-64K to 1-64K. This change is trivial and both APIs (new/old) can coexist without any clash. Review: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/613562/
Previous meeting logs
- Previous meetings, with their notes and logs, can be found here.
