|
|
Line 5: |
Line 5: |
| == Agenda for next meeting == | | == Agenda for next meeting == |
| | | |
− | * Scheduling mid-cycle keystone hackathon @ Rackspace in San Antonio, TX | + | * Reminder: Hackathon January 15-17th @ Rackspace in San Antonio, TX |
− | ** Icehouse-m2 milestone-proposed branch will be created on [[Icehouse_Release_Schedule|January 23th]]
| |
− | ** Option 1: Wednesday-Thursday-Friday January 17-19th (ahead of the milestone)
| |
− | ** Option 2: Monday-Tuesday-Wednesday January 22-24th (around the milestone)
| |
− | * [Brant] Tempest change for [https://review.openstack.org/#/c/56106/ assignments-doesn't-check-identity]
| |
− | ** Do we need a new blueprint? the ones we have aren't going to be obvious to tempest - split-identity is closed and federation doesn't say this.
| |
− | ** From last time:
| |
− | *** Allows both 200 and 404... could change to 200-only after keystone change merges.
| |
− | *** Not surprised at -1 since didn't provide any justification (more proof of concept until have blueprint)
| |
− | *** [https://review.openstack.org/#/c/54647/ keystone change]
| |
− | * [Brant] REMOTE_USER auth v2 and v3 mismatch
| |
− | ** I think we should have a doc/etherpad says what plugins we need... I'm confused as to what we're going to provide with exiting changes.
| |
− | * Code reviews for [https://launchpad.net/keystone/+milestone/icehouse-1 icehouse blueprints]
| |
− | ** [https://review.openstack.org/#/c/38414 API Version Discovery]
| |
− | ** [https://review.openstack.org/#/c/51980 Add federation API]
| |
− | ** [https://review.openstack.org/#/c/59546 Revocation Events]
| |
− | ** [https://review.openstack.org/#/c/59600 for KDS]
| |
− | * [Brant] Moving keystone tests to tempest
| |
− | ** Tempest doesn't want our [https://review.openstack.org/#/c/60724/ tests] as they are. They have scenario tests, but they're not like our keystoneclient tests.
| |
− | ** Had a few proposals on the [http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2013-December/021629.html ML]
| |
− | *** Don't put the tests in Tempest. Have new jobs, could get the code from keystone, new project, or whatever. (This would get the testing out of K6e quickly.)
| |
− | *** Clean up tests in keystone so that they're like tempest would accept as scenario tests, then move to tempest.
| |
− | *** Drop this testing - nobody else is doing this so why do we?
| |
− | **** Stop checkout in keystone, just test master; then can change keystone to use webtest rather than the client (like v3 tests).
| |
− | * Open Topic
| |
− | ** [https://blueprints.launchpad.net/keystone/+spec/service-scoped-role-definition service or resource scoped role definition]
| |
| | | |
| == Previous meetings == | | == Previous meetings == |
| | | |
| Logs and meeting summaries of previous meetings are located [http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/keystone/ here]. | | Logs and meeting summaries of previous meetings are located [http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/keystone/ here]. |
If you're interested in identity for OpenStack, we hold public meetings weekly on IRC in #openstack-meeting
, on Tuesdays at 18:00 UTC. Please feel free to add items to the agenda below with your name and we'll cover them.