Difference between revisions of "Meetings/KeystoneMeeting"
< Meetings
Jamielennox (talk | contribs) (→Review of Keystone Blueprints for No-Spec Requires Status) |
Feng Xi Yan (talk | contribs) (→Agenda for next meeting) |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
* 3/17 | * 3/17 | ||
** requirements.txt: Should requirements.txt be for the expected installation (e.g., LDAP, fernet?) or only actual requirements? - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/162360/ <code>bknudson</code> | ** requirements.txt: Should requirements.txt be for the expected installation (e.g., LDAP, fernet?) or only actual requirements? - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/162360/ <code>bknudson</code> | ||
| + | ** db2 ci: talk about the issue of IBM DB2 CI, how to fix it and how to re-enable it. <code>yanfengxi</code> | ||
* 3/10 | * 3/10 | ||
Revision as of 08:40, 16 March 2015
Contents
Weekly Keystone team meeting
If you're interested in identity for OpenStack, we hold public meetings weekly on IRC in #openstack-meeting, on Tuesdays at 18:00 UTC. Please feel free to add items to the agenda below with your name and we'll cover them.
Regular attendees
Add yourself to this list to be pinged prior to each meeting:
dolphm, ayoung, dstanek, jamielennox, morganfainberg, stevemar, gyee, henrynash, topol, marekd, lbragstad, joesavak, shardy, fabiog, nkinder, lloydm, shrekuma, ksavich, hrybacki, rharwood, grantbow, vdreamarkitex, raildo, rodrigods, amakarov, ajayaa, hogepodge, breton, lhcheng, nonameentername, samueldmq, htruta, amolock, wanghong, fmarco76
Agenda for next meeting
Main Agenda
Please add agenda items to the bottom of this section's list (be sure to include your irc_handle!).
- 3/17
- requirements.txt: Should requirements.txt be for the expected installation (e.g., LDAP, fernet?) or only actual requirements? - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/162360/
bknudson - db2 ci: talk about the issue of IBM DB2 CI, how to fix it and how to re-enable it.
yanfengxi
- requirements.txt: Should requirements.txt be for the expected installation (e.g., LDAP, fernet?) or only actual requirements? - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/162360/
- 3/10
- JSON Home: Support for experimental/disabled. When we approved the spec for moving away from extensions, we specified that resources might be appear as "experimental" (if they were still maturing) or "disabled" (if that features had been turned off by a config switch) in the JSON Home response. Concern, however, has been raised as to whether this is a valid way of using JSON Home. The new domain-config-database support is the first new resources to use this....before we merge its JSON Home support, let's make sure we are still happy with this approach. (
henrynash) - keystone vs Keystone (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/162561/)
breton
- JSON Home: Support for experimental/disabled. When we approved the spec for moving away from extensions, we specified that resources might be appear as "experimental" (if they were still maturing) or "disabled" (if that features had been turned off by a config switch) in the JSON Home response. Concern, however, has been raised as to whether this is a valid way of using JSON Home. The new domain-config-database support is the first new resources to use this....before we merge its JSON Home support, let's make sure we are still happy with this approach. (
Review of Keystone Blueprints for No-Spec Requires Status
Please add BPs to the bottom of this sections list that should be reviewed as not requiring a spec (include your irc_handle!).
- https://blueprints.launchpad.net/python-keystoneclient/+spec/plugin-wrapper (
jamielennox) - https://blueprints.launchpad.net/python-keystoneclient/+spec/generic-plugins (
jamielennox)
Keystone Weekly Bug Reports
Bugs for the various Keystone repositories are collects and published to the following links. (lbragstad)
Previous meetings
Logs and meeting summaries of previous meetings are located here.
