Jump to: navigation, search

Difference between revisions of "Meetings/Ironic"

(Agenda for next meeting)
(Agenda for next meeting)
Line 18: Line 18:
 
== Agenda for next meeting ==
 
== Agenda for next meeting ==
 
* Announcements / Reminder
 
* Announcements / Reminder
** Tenks is now under Ironic governance \o/ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/600411/
 
 
* Review action items from previous meeting: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/ironic/2018/
 
* Review action items from previous meeting: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/ironic/2018/
 
* Review [https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/IronicWhiteBoard subteam status reports] (capped at ten minutes)
 
* Review [https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/IronicWhiteBoard subteam status reports] (capped at ten minutes)
 
* Deciding on priorities for the coming week
 
* Deciding on priorities for the coming week
 
* Discussion (Requests to have your patch reviewed should not be a 'Discussion' topic. If desired, please discuss during 'Open Discussion')
 
* Discussion (Requests to have your patch reviewed should not be a 'Discussion' topic. If desired, please discuss during 'Open Discussion')
** (tonyb/TheJulia) Handling BMCs that support most of IMPI but don't like [http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/ironic/tree/ironic/drivers/modules/ipmitool.py#n920 this] from [https://review.openstack.org/#/c/134413/ here] - https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2004266
+
** (TheJulia) Do we continue with the coreos CI testing?
*** See https://review.openstack.org/616053 and https://review.openstack.org/583488
+
*** Presently the CoreOS IPA jobs have not been migrated due to high failure rates  as the image size for CoreOS has continued to grow as time has progressed. Due to this they have been marked as non-voting for some time, and we don't use CoreOS anywhere in our CI testing at this point.
 +
*** If we want we could always have a job that built it on debian but just didn't publish?
 
* RFE review
 
* RFE review
 
* Open discussion
 
* Open discussion

Revision as of 15:53, 29 November 2018

Weekly Ironic Project Team Meeting

If you're interested in bare metal deployments within OpenStack, please join our weekly discussion about the Ironic project! The one-hour weekly meetings start at 1500 UTC on Mondays (as of March 26, 2018), are held in the #openstack-ironic room on irc.freenode.net, and are chaired by Julia Kreger (TheJulia) or Dmitry Tantsur (dtantsur).

NOTE: Meeting time is UTC based and may need to be adjusted based on local time zone changes, eg. as a result of daylight savings, which changes on different days in different countries.


Anyone is welcome to add topics to the agenda. However, topics should be posted at least two (2) days before the meeting to give folks time to get context, and should include the IRC handle of the proposer and a link to further information. This gives everyone time to review any material ahead of time so we can use the meeting time for actual discussion. Requests to have a patch reviewed should not be a topic and instead should be covered during the Open Discussion portion of the meeting.

Next Meeting

Meetings are held weekly. If one is cancelled, it will either be mentioned in the previous meeting or an email will be sent out to the openstack-dev mailing list.

Agenda for next meeting

  • Announcements / Reminder
  • Review action items from previous meeting: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/ironic/2018/
  • Review subteam status reports (capped at ten minutes)
  • Deciding on priorities for the coming week
  • Discussion (Requests to have your patch reviewed should not be a 'Discussion' topic. If desired, please discuss during 'Open Discussion')
    • (TheJulia) Do we continue with the coreos CI testing?
      • Presently the CoreOS IPA jobs have not been migrated due to high failure rates as the image size for CoreOS has continued to grow as time has progressed. Due to this they have been marked as non-voting for some time, and we don't use CoreOS anywhere in our CI testing at this point.
      • If we want we could always have a job that built it on debian but just didn't publish?
  • RFE review
  • Open discussion

Previous meetings

Logs from previous meetings can be found here.

Related meetings

<none>