Jump to: navigation, search

Difference between revisions of "Meetings/InfraTeamMeeting"

(Agenda for next meeting)
Line 14: Line 14:
  
 
* Specs approval
 
* Specs approval
 +
** https://review.opendev.org/#/c/709579/ Cleaning up python dev tools on our CI images.
 +
*** https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/pTFF4U9Klz : clarkb writeup of major issues
 +
*** https://review.opendev.org/707499 : discussion in comments
 +
*** https://review.opendev.org/707513 : use venv for glean
 +
*** https://review.opendev.org/707750 : use venv in project-config elements; drop pip-and-virtualenv inclusion from element and move to individual configs; add node type with no pip-and-virtualenv.  this can be used for job testing.
 +
** https://review.opendev.org/#/c/709236/ Website activity stats
  
 
* Priority Efforts (Standing meeting agenda items. Please expand if you have subtopics.)
 
* Priority Efforts (Standing meeting agenda items. Please expand if you have subtopics.)
Line 23: Line 29:
 
**** https://review.opendev.org/#/c/703134/ Split OpenDev out of OpenStack governance.
 
**** https://review.opendev.org/#/c/703134/ Split OpenDev out of OpenStack governance.
 
**** https://review.opendev.org/#/c/703488 Updates to our project documentation with governance info
 
**** https://review.opendev.org/#/c/703488 Updates to our project documentation with governance info
*** Upgrade gitea to 1.10.3 https://review.opendev.org/#/c/705804/
 
  
 
* General topics
 
* General topics
 
** Xwiki for opendev (ttx 20200224)
 
** Xwiki for opendev (ttx 20200224)
** Vancouver PTG attendance. (clarkb 20200218)
+
** Vancouver PTG attendance. (clarkb 20200225)
*** That time of year where we need to decide if we are going and if so how much time and space we need.
+
*** Request space for a small group in Vancouver. Mentioned that we can be flexible, but having some official time is useful so that people can find us with questions. Then with a small group it is easy enough to meet in an ad hoc fashion (this worked well in Shanghai).
** Trusty Upgrade Progress (clarkb 20200218)
+
** Trusty Upgrade Progress (clarkb 20200225)
 
*** Wiki updates
 
*** Wiki updates
** static.openstack.org (ianw,corvus,mnaser,fungi 20200218)
+
** static.openstack.org (ianw,corvus,mnaser,fungi 20200225)
 
*** static.openstack.org transition should be complete
 
*** static.openstack.org transition should be complete
 
*** still tasks remaining (haproxy redirects, few other publishing sites)
 
*** still tasks remaining (haproxy redirects, few other publishing sites)
** New Airship CI cloud (clarkb 20200218)
+
 
** pip-and-virtualenv removal (ianw 20200218)
 
*** https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/pTFF4U9Klz : clarkb writeup of major issues
 
*** possible removal plan: use py3 venv (built in) on all platforms for build-time "utility" installs (glean, bindep, stackviz, whatever); ship images without any non-distro-packaged tools; add for backwards compatibility via base jobs
 
*** https://review.opendev.org/707499 : discussion in comments
 
*** https://review.opendev.org/707513 : use venv for glean
 
*** https://review.opendev.org/707750 : use venv in project-config elements; drop pip-and-virtualenv inclusion from element and move to individual configs; add node type with no pip-and-virtualenv.  this can be used for job testing.
 
  
 
* Open discussion
 
* Open discussion
** Need to clarify logging requirements from https://docs.openstack.org/infra/system-config/third_party.html -- mainly the "logs must be browsable; logs requiring download, installation or login to access are not acceptable" phrase. (ssbarnea 20200217)
 
*** Does it apply to any logs or only tempest ones? Current indentation seems wrong, was this expected to be top level?
 
*** Is ever accepted to produce combined .tar.gz files with host-logs?
 
*** In which conditions it would be acceptable to archive a big log file? Example publishing a 1GB single log file is clearly not of any use for browsing it. I suspect after certain size is ok to archive them but this is not mentioned. What would be the magic threshold?
 
  
 
== Upcoming Project Renames ==
 
== Upcoming Project Renames ==

Revision as of 18:34, 24 February 2020

Weekly Project Infrastructure team meeting

The OpenStack Project Infrastructure Team holds public weekly meetings in #openstack-meeting, Tuesdays at 1900 UTC. Everyone interested in infrastructure and process surrounding automated testing and deployment is encouraged to attend.

Please feel free to add agenda items (and your IRC nick in parenthesis).

Agenda for next meeting

  • Announcements
  • Actions from last meeting
  • General topics
    • Xwiki for opendev (ttx 20200224)
    • Vancouver PTG attendance. (clarkb 20200225)
      • Request space for a small group in Vancouver. Mentioned that we can be flexible, but having some official time is useful so that people can find us with questions. Then with a small group it is easy enough to meet in an ad hoc fashion (this worked well in Shanghai).
    • Trusty Upgrade Progress (clarkb 20200225)
      • Wiki updates
    • static.openstack.org (ianw,corvus,mnaser,fungi 20200225)
      • static.openstack.org transition should be complete
      • still tasks remaining (haproxy redirects, few other publishing sites)


  • Open discussion

Upcoming Project Renames

(any additions should mention original->new full names and link to the corresponding project-config rename change in Gerrit)

None currently.

Previous meetings

Previous meetings, with their notes and logs, can be found at http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/infra/ and earlier at http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/ci/