Difference between revisions of "Meetings/Horizon/Feb17log"
(Created page with "12:02:43 < doug-fish> looks right to me 12:02:51 < robcresswell> Hmm. 12:03:11 < robcresswell> Doesn't seem to like me trying to start the meeting. 12:03:20 < doug-fish> "Once...") |
m |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | 12:02:43 < doug-fish> looks right to me | + | * 12:02:43 < doug-fish> looks right to me |
| − | 12:02:51 < robcresswell> Hmm. | + | * 12:02:51 < robcresswell> Hmm. |
| − | 12:03:11 < robcresswell> Doesn't seem to like me trying to start the meeting. | + | * 12:03:11 < robcresswell> Doesn't seem to like me trying to start the meeting. |
| − | 12:03:20 < doug-fish> "Once the #startmeeting command has been issued, the bot should start the meeting. If the bot doesn't respond to this command, ask for assistance in #openstack-infra. " | + | * 12:03:20 < doug-fish> "Once the #startmeeting command has been issued, the bot should start the meeting. If the bot doesn't respond to this command, ask for assistance in #openstack-infra. " |
| − | 12:03:23 < doug-fish> that's from the wiki! | + | * 12:03:23 < doug-fish> that's from the wiki! |
| − | 12:03:27 < doug-fish> seems relevant | + | * 12:03:27 < doug-fish> seems relevant |
| − | 12:03:38 < r1chardj0n3s> freenode has had issues, might have affected bot | + | * 12:03:38 < r1chardj0n3s> freenode has had issues, might have affected bot |
| − | 12:03:55 < piet> #startmeeting horizon | + | * 12:03:55 < piet> #startmeeting horizon |
| − | 12:04:12 < robcresswell> Yeah, the bot isnt in channel. | + | * 12:04:12 < robcresswell> Yeah, the bot isnt in channel. |
| − | 12:04:40 < robcresswell> Right, lets continue anyway. | + | * 12:04:40 < robcresswell> Right, lets continue anyway. |
| − | 12:05:10 < robcresswell> Only notice is a reminder about deadlines | + | * 12:05:10 < robcresswell> Only notice is a reminder about deadlines |
| − | 12:05:25 < robcresswell> 2 weeks today | + | * 12:05:25 < robcresswell> 2 weeks today |
| − | 12:06:00 < robcresswell> Until M-3 releases. We need to make sure bps are complete and ready for review. Start pestering cores if you need to. | + | * 12:06:00 < robcresswell> Until M-3 releases. We need to make sure bps are complete and ready for review. Start pestering cores if you need to. |
| − | 12:06:22 < itxaka> yay, pestering cores \o/ | + | * 12:06:22 < itxaka> yay, pestering cores \o/ |
| − | 12:06:32 < robcresswell> Any other notices before we move on to the agenda? | + | * 12:06:32 < robcresswell> Any other notices before we move on to the agenda? |
| − | 12:06:43 < betherly> yay IRC has let me into the meeting! | + | * 12:06:43 < betherly> yay IRC has let me into the meeting! |
| − | 12:07:32 < robcresswell> #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Horizon#Agenda_for_2016-02-17_12_UTC | + | * 12:07:32 < robcresswell> #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Horizon#Agenda_for_2016-02-17_12_UTC |
| − | 12:08:00 < robcresswell> #topic d_o_a stable releases for kilo/liberty | + | * 12:08:00 < robcresswell> #topic d_o_a stable releases for kilo/liberty |
| − | 12:08:10 < robcresswell> Urgh none of this is going to work is it. | + | * 12:08:10 < robcresswell> Urgh none of this is going to work is it. |
| − | 12:08:20 < doug-fish> :-) | + | * 12:08:20 < doug-fish> :-) |
| − | 12:08:26 < robcresswell> mrunge: You're up :) | + | * 12:08:26 < robcresswell> mrunge: You're up :) |
| − | 12:08:44 < mrunge> uhm, on a call currently | + | * 12:08:44 < mrunge> uhm, on a call currently |
| − | 12:08:59 < mrunge> itxaka | + | * 12:08:59 < mrunge> itxaka |
| − | 12:09:00 < mrunge> ? | + | * 12:09:00 < mrunge> ? |
| − | 12:09:02 < itxaka> yeah | + | * 12:09:02 < itxaka> yeah |
| − | 12:09:28 < robcresswell> itxaka, can you speak about the agenda items? | + | * 12:09:28 < robcresswell> itxaka, can you speak about the agenda items? |
| − | 12:09:31 < itxaka> basically regarding the patches linked in the agenda, tsufiev showed concern on the release timing for them | + | * 12:09:31 < itxaka> basically regarding the patches linked in the agenda, tsufiev showed concern on the release timing for them |
| − | 12:09:46 < itxaka> and its a concern that we should all share | + | * 12:09:46 < itxaka> and its a concern that we should all share |
| − | 12:10:03 < tsufiev> itxaka, me? | + | * 12:10:03 < tsufiev> itxaka, me? |
| − | 12:10:06 < itxaka> doa should make a stable release for kilo and liberty | + | * 12:10:06 < itxaka> doa should make a stable release for kilo and liberty |
| − | 12:10:40 < tsufiev> itxaka, ah, got it | + | * 12:10:40 < tsufiev> itxaka, ah, got it |
| − | 12:10:44 < tsufiev> yes, I did :) | + | * 12:10:44 < tsufiev> yes, I did :) |
| − | 12:10:45 < itxaka> and then a horizon liberty/kilo release should also follow with a new constraint on doa version to avoid any issues | + | * 12:10:45 < itxaka> and then a horizon liberty/kilo release should also follow with a new constraint on doa version to avoid any issues |
| − | 12:12:50 < itxaka> basically a horizon patch needs a specific new doa version with some backports already merged or it will introduce a known bug | + | * 12:12:50 < itxaka> basically a horizon patch needs a specific new doa version with some backports already merged or it will introduce a known bug |
| − | 12:13:20 < robcresswell> Sounds reasonable | + | * 12:13:20 < robcresswell> Sounds reasonable |
| − | 12:13:35 < mrunge> this reads to me like: release a now doa version for kilo, then increase global requirements and then finally patch horizon | + | * 12:13:35 < mrunge> this reads to me like: release a now doa version for kilo, then increase global requirements and then finally patch horizon |
| − | 12:13:36 < itxaka> so Im guessing release new doa version for kilo/liberty -> bump the requirements for doa in horizon kilo/liberty -> release new horizon version for kilo/liberty | + | * 12:13:36 < itxaka> so Im guessing release new doa version for kilo/liberty -> bump the requirements for doa in horizon kilo/liberty -> release new horizon version for kilo/liberty |
| − | 12:14:42 < itxaka> I dont have it very clear how the release process works and so on, so thats the main concern for me | + | * 12:14:42 < itxaka> I dont have it very clear how the release process works and so on, so thats the main concern for me |
| − | 12:14:43 < mrunge> does anyone of you have other patches in the queue for doa in kilo/liberty? | + | * 12:14:43 < mrunge> does anyone of you have other patches in the queue for doa in kilo/liberty? |
| − | 12:15:06 < mrunge> itxaka, either david-lyle or I should take care of that | + | * 12:15:06 < mrunge> itxaka, either david-lyle or I should take care of that |
| − | 12:15:08 < robcresswell> Best people to speak to are david-lyle and lhcheng | + | * 12:15:08 < robcresswell> Best people to speak to are david-lyle and lhcheng |
| − | 12:15:52 < itxaka> releasing the doa version should be no problem thanks to a david-lyle patch that fixes backwards compatibility https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:bug/1526572 | + | * 12:15:52 < itxaka> releasing the doa version should be no problem thanks to a david-lyle patch that fixes backwards compatibility https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:bug/1526572 |
| − | 12:15:57 < mrunge> worst thing with releases is, process changes from release to release | + | * 12:15:57 < mrunge> worst thing with releases is, process changes from release to release |
| − | 12:16:40 < robcresswell> As as we're careful, I don't imagine there should be any huge issues. It's just a stable bugfix release. | + | * 12:16:40 < robcresswell> As as we're careful, I don't imagine there should be any huge issues. It's just a stable bugfix release. |
| − | 12:16:41 < mrunge> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/ReleaseTeam/How_To_Release | + | * 12:16:41 < mrunge> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/ReleaseTeam/How_To_Release |
| − | 12:16:51 < robcresswell> famous last words... | + | * 12:16:51 < robcresswell> famous last words... |
| − | 12:17:40 < mrunge> I'd be tagging doa release tomorrow then, if nothing else comes up | + | * 12:17:40 < mrunge> I'd be tagging doa release tomorrow then, if nothing else comes up |
| − | 12:18:11 < itxaka> I think the workflow of doa -> bump reqs in horizon -> horizon should alliviate any concers tsufiev ? | + | * 12:18:11 < itxaka> I think the workflow of doa -> bump reqs in horizon -> horizon should alliviate any concers tsufiev ? |
| − | 12:18:44 < tsufiev> itxaka, no, just a little note: bump reqs in openstack/requirements, not in horizon | + | * 12:18:44 < tsufiev> itxaka, no, just a little note: bump reqs in openstack/requirements, not in horizon |
| − | 12:19:01 < tsufiev> then proposal bot will propose a requirements patch into horizon | + | * 12:19:01 < tsufiev> then proposal bot will propose a requirements patch into horizon |
| − | 12:19:35 < itxaka> sounds good to me | + | * 12:19:35 < itxaka> sounds good to me |
| − | 12:20:13 < itxaka> mrunge, this affects the liberty branch as well, patches are all merged in liberty (doa and horizon) | + | * 12:20:13 < itxaka> mrunge, this affects the liberty branch as well, patches are all merged in liberty (doa and horizon) |
| − | 12:20:26 < mrunge> ack | + | * 12:20:26 < mrunge> ack |
| − | 12:21:47 < robcresswell> That's the only agenda items | + | * 12:21:47 < robcresswell> That's the only agenda items |
| − | 12:22:00 < robcresswell> So: open discussion | + | * 12:22:00 < robcresswell> So: open discussion |
| − | 12:24:20 < robcresswell> Anyone have any topics? Or we can have some time back :) | + | * 12:24:20 < robcresswell> Anyone have any topics? Or we can have some time back :) |
| − | 12:24:49 < mrunge> masco? | + | * 12:24:49 < mrunge> masco? |
| − | 12:24:52 < mrunge> sigh | + | * 12:24:52 < mrunge> sigh |
| − | 12:25:55 < r1chardj0n3s> hum, I disappeared for a bit there | + | * 12:25:55 < r1chardj0n3s> hum, I disappeared for a bit there |
| − | 12:25:55 < r1chardj0n3s> hope I didn't miss anything | + | * 12:25:55 < r1chardj0n3s> hope I didn't miss anything |
| − | 12:26:00 < mrunge> not really, r1chardj0n3s | + | * 12:26:00 < mrunge> not really, r1chardj0n3s |
| − | 12:26:02 < robcresswell> Nothing much | + | * 12:26:02 < robcresswell> Nothing much |
| − | 12:26:16 < robcresswell> Anything you wanted to discuss? Otherwise I'm gonna call it | + | * 12:26:16 < robcresswell> Anything you wanted to discuss? Otherwise I'm gonna call it |
| − | 12:26:22 < r1chardj0n3s> might be worthwhile reminding folks of https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/horizon-mitaka-midcycle | + | * 12:26:22 < r1chardj0n3s> might be worthwhile reminding folks of https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/horizon-mitaka-midcycle |
| − | 12:26:28 < mrunge> call it then... | + | * 12:26:28 < mrunge> call it then... |
| − | 12:26:43 < r1chardj0n3s> reckon we might have a busy enough few days just trying to move code thru that's in play | + | * 12:26:43 < r1chardj0n3s> reckon we might have a busy enough few days just trying to move code thru that's in play |
| − | 12:26:52 < r1chardj0n3s> but just in case there's something you'd like to talk about | + | * 12:26:52 < r1chardj0n3s> but just in case there's something you'd like to talk about |
| − | 12:27:02 < r1chardj0n3s> (like angular patch size ;-) | + | * 12:27:02 < r1chardj0n3s> (like angular patch size ;-) |
| − | 12:27:03 < robcresswell> Yeah, I think we'll be focusing on paired coding and reviews it seems | + | * 12:27:03 < robcresswell> Yeah, I think we'll be focusing on paired coding and reviews it seems |
| − | 12:27:16 < mrunge> oh, would it be possible to loop external folks in to midcycle? | + | * 12:27:16 < mrunge> oh, would it be possible to loop external folks in to midcycle? |
| − | 12:27:24 < r1chardj0n3s> also, there's a global bugbash coming up | + | * 12:27:24 < r1chardj0n3s> also, there's a global bugbash coming up |
| − | 12:27:48 < robcresswell> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/OpenStack-Bug-Smash-Mitaka | + | * 12:27:48 < robcresswell> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/OpenStack-Bug-Smash-Mitaka |
| − | 12:27:49 < mrunge> angular patch size is indeed a concern of mine | + | * 12:27:49 < mrunge> angular patch size is indeed a concern of mine |
| − | 12:28:08 < r1chardj0n3s> thanks robcresswell | + | * 12:28:08 < r1chardj0n3s> thanks robcresswell |
| − | 12:28:20 < robcresswell> Good point. So this is very similar to our Horizon bug days | + | * 12:28:20 < robcresswell> Good point. So this is very similar to our Horizon bug days |
| − | 12:28:33 < r1chardj0n3s> feel free to pop over to Sydney and smash some bugs with us ... or go somewhere more | + | * 12:28:33 < r1chardj0n3s> feel free to pop over to Sydney and smash some bugs with us ... or go somewhere more local ;-) |
| − | local ;-) | + | * 12:28:43 < robcresswell> It would be good to get involved in the bug day. I'll be at the London location for at least a couple of the days |
| − | 12:28:43 < robcresswell> It would be good to get involved in the bug day. I'll be at the London location for at least a couple of the days | + | * 12:29:14 < r1chardj0n3s> robcresswell: say hi to Alex, who just joined the London office from Brisbane. She says it's cold over there. Who'd have thought. |
| − | 12:29:14 < r1chardj0n3s> robcresswell: say hi to Alex, who just joined the London office from Brisbane. She says it's cold over there. Who'd have thought. | + | * 12:29:48 < robcresswell> Ha, bad decision :p |
| − | 12:29:48 < robcresswell> Ha, bad decision :p | + | * 12:30:06 < r1chardj0n3s> anyway, I don't have anything further, thanks |
| − | 12:30:06 < r1chardj0n3s> anyway, I don't have anything further, thanks | + | * 12:30:23 < r1chardj0n3s> going to bed before midnight sounds nice |
| − | 12:30:23 < r1chardj0n3s> going to bed before midnight sounds nice | + | * 12:30:31 < mrunge> masco, you had something to discuss? |
| − | 12:30:31 < mrunge> masco, you had something to discuss? | + | * 12:30:50 < mrunge> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/255854/# |
| − | 12:30:50 < mrunge> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/255854/# | + | * 12:31:10 < masco> mrunge, https://review.openstack.org/#/c/255854/ i need ppl opinion on this |
| − | 12:31:10 < masco> mrunge, https://review.openstack.org/#/c/255854/ i need ppl opinion on this | + | * 12:31:22 < masco> oh you are faster then me |
| − | 12:31:22 < masco> oh you are faster then me | + | * 12:31:33 < mrunge> hr hr hr |
| − | 12:31:33 < mrunge> hr hr hr | + | * 12:31:56 < mrunge> with that being said, I have to leave, unfortunately :P |
| − | 12:31:56 < mrunge> with that being said, I have to leave, unfortunately :P | + | * 12:32:24 < robcresswell> masco: Just reading |
| − | 12:32:24 < robcresswell> masco: Just reading | + | * 12:32:52 < mrunge> it was about to collect feedback, thoughts etc. |
| − | 12:32:52 < mrunge> it was about to collect feedback, thoughts etc. | + | * 12:33:03 < mrunge> it seems to be a good addition, but some disagreement on implementation |
| − | 12:33:03 < mrunge> it seems to be a good addition, but some disagreement on implementation | + | * 12:34:00 < robcresswell> Yep reading comments |
| − | 12:34:00 < robcresswell> Yep reading comments | + | * 12:34:15 < doug-fish> David's suggestion seems good to me - does somebody not like that? |
| − | 12:34:15 < doug-fish> David's suggestion seems good to me - does somebody not like that? | + | * 12:34:23 < tsufiev> masco, btw, what are your further plans on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/261930/ ? |
| − | 12:34:23 < tsufiev> masco, btw, what are your further plans on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/261930/ ? | + | * 12:34:32 < masco> i hope performance wise there will not be much problem |
| − | 12:34:32 < masco> i hope performance wise there will not be much problem | + | * 12:35:24 < masco> tsufiev, i think instead of deleting the field just hiding will help. am i right? |
| − | 12:35:24 < masco> tsufiev, i think instead of deleting the field just hiding will help. am i right? | + | * 12:35:47 < tsufiev> masco, yes, should be a good approach |
| − | 12:35:47 < tsufiev> masco, yes, should be a good approach | + | * 12:35:53 < masco> since integration needs the shared field |
| − | 12:35:53 < masco> since integration needs the shared field | + | * 12:35:56 * tsufiev wonders why he didn't think about it |
| − | 12:35:56 * tsufiev wonders why he didn't think about it | + | * 12:36:11 < masco> ok will submit a patch for that |
| − | 12:36:11 < masco> ok will submit a patch for that | + | * 12:36:17 < tsufiev> masco, awesome :) |
| − | 12:36:17 < tsufiev> masco, awesome :) | + | * 12:36:30 < masco> tsufiev, :) even i too got this today |
| − | 12:36:30 < masco> tsufiev, :) even i too got this today | + | * 12:36:31 < robcresswell> Er, why is an individual user get memoized? |
| − | 12:36:31 < robcresswell> Er, why is an individual user get memoized? | + | * 12:36:48 < robcresswell> Just scanning. |
| − | 12:36:48 < robcresswell> Just scanning. | + | * 12:37:38 < robcresswell> I mean this seems like the memoized part is irrelevant if you're making multiple individual calls |
| − | 12:37:38 < robcresswell> I mean this seems like the memoized part is irrelevant if you're making multiple individual calls | + | * 12:37:47 < robcresswell> the id would change, no? |
| − | 12:37:47 < robcresswell> the id would change, no? | + | * 12:38:07 < masco> robcresswell, can change |
| − | 12:38:07 < masco> robcresswell, can change | + | * 12:38:25 < masco> i mean for different users |
| − | 12:38:25 < masco> i mean for different users | + | * 12:38:59 < robcresswell> It seems like it would be poor peformance would it not? just making api calls for each user |
| − | 12:38:59 < robcresswell> It seems like it would be poor peformance would it not? just making api calls for each user | + | * 12:39:05 < robcresswell> As David noted. |
| − | 12:39:05 < robcresswell> As David noted. | + | * 12:39:40 < masco> yes, if each user is different |
| − | 12:39:40 < masco> yes, if each user is different | + | * 12:39:49 < robcresswell> I guess it depends on no. of users per instance. Hmm.. |
| − | 12:39:49 < robcresswell> I guess it depends on no. of users per instance. Hmm.. | + | * 12:39:51 < masco> but practically it won't |
| − | 12:39:51 < masco> but practically it won't | + | * 12:40:00 < robcresswell> Yeah, it shouldnt be huge. |
| − | 12:40:00 < robcresswell> Yeah, it shouldnt be huge. | + | * 12:40:28 < masco> yes |
| − | 12:40:28 < masco> yes | + | * 12:40:39 < masco> so no worry for performance ;) |
| − | 12:40:39 < masco> so no worry for performance ;) | + | * 12:41:17 < robcresswell> Better speak with david then :) |
| − | 12:41:17 < robcresswell> Better speak with david then :) | + | * 12:41:46 < masco> robcresswell, sure. thanks. please add your points on it. |
| − | 12:41:46 < masco> robcresswell, sure. thanks. please add your points on it. | + | * 12:42:06 < masco> it will help for future reference :) |
| − | 12:42:06 < masco> it will help for future reference :) | + | * 12:44:04 < robcresswell> Anyone else with discussion points? |
| − | 12:44:04 < robcresswell> Anyone else with discussion points? | + | * 12:44:09 < robcresswell> masco: Sure |
| − | 12:44:09 < robcresswell> masco: Sure | + | * 12:45:41 < robcresswell> We'll end the meeting there, have 15 mins back :) |
| − | 12:45:41 < robcresswell> We'll end the meeting there, have 15 mins back :) | ||
12:45:54 < masco> i don't have anything specific. but i just want request the core to review my QoS patches :) | 12:45:54 < masco> i don't have anything specific. but i just want request the core to review my QoS patches :) | ||
Revision as of 12:56, 17 February 2016
- 12:02:43 < doug-fish> looks right to me
- 12:02:51 < robcresswell> Hmm.
- 12:03:11 < robcresswell> Doesn't seem to like me trying to start the meeting.
- 12:03:20 < doug-fish> "Once the #startmeeting command has been issued, the bot should start the meeting. If the bot doesn't respond to this command, ask for assistance in #openstack-infra. "
- 12:03:23 < doug-fish> that's from the wiki!
- 12:03:27 < doug-fish> seems relevant
- 12:03:38 < r1chardj0n3s> freenode has had issues, might have affected bot
- 12:03:55 < piet> #startmeeting horizon
- 12:04:12 < robcresswell> Yeah, the bot isnt in channel.
- 12:04:40 < robcresswell> Right, lets continue anyway.
- 12:05:10 < robcresswell> Only notice is a reminder about deadlines
- 12:05:25 < robcresswell> 2 weeks today
- 12:06:00 < robcresswell> Until M-3 releases. We need to make sure bps are complete and ready for review. Start pestering cores if you need to.
- 12:06:22 < itxaka> yay, pestering cores \o/
- 12:06:32 < robcresswell> Any other notices before we move on to the agenda?
- 12:06:43 < betherly> yay IRC has let me into the meeting!
- 12:07:32 < robcresswell> #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Horizon#Agenda_for_2016-02-17_12_UTC
- 12:08:00 < robcresswell> #topic d_o_a stable releases for kilo/liberty
- 12:08:10 < robcresswell> Urgh none of this is going to work is it.
- 12:08:20 < doug-fish> :-)
- 12:08:26 < robcresswell> mrunge: You're up :)
- 12:08:44 < mrunge> uhm, on a call currently
- 12:08:59 < mrunge> itxaka
- 12:09:00 < mrunge> ?
- 12:09:02 < itxaka> yeah
- 12:09:28 < robcresswell> itxaka, can you speak about the agenda items?
- 12:09:31 < itxaka> basically regarding the patches linked in the agenda, tsufiev showed concern on the release timing for them
- 12:09:46 < itxaka> and its a concern that we should all share
- 12:10:03 < tsufiev> itxaka, me?
- 12:10:06 < itxaka> doa should make a stable release for kilo and liberty
- 12:10:40 < tsufiev> itxaka, ah, got it
- 12:10:44 < tsufiev> yes, I did :)
- 12:10:45 < itxaka> and then a horizon liberty/kilo release should also follow with a new constraint on doa version to avoid any issues
- 12:12:50 < itxaka> basically a horizon patch needs a specific new doa version with some backports already merged or it will introduce a known bug
- 12:13:20 < robcresswell> Sounds reasonable
- 12:13:35 < mrunge> this reads to me like: release a now doa version for kilo, then increase global requirements and then finally patch horizon
- 12:13:36 < itxaka> so Im guessing release new doa version for kilo/liberty -> bump the requirements for doa in horizon kilo/liberty -> release new horizon version for kilo/liberty
- 12:14:42 < itxaka> I dont have it very clear how the release process works and so on, so thats the main concern for me
- 12:14:43 < mrunge> does anyone of you have other patches in the queue for doa in kilo/liberty?
- 12:15:06 < mrunge> itxaka, either david-lyle or I should take care of that
- 12:15:08 < robcresswell> Best people to speak to are david-lyle and lhcheng
- 12:15:52 < itxaka> releasing the doa version should be no problem thanks to a david-lyle patch that fixes backwards compatibility https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:bug/1526572
- 12:15:57 < mrunge> worst thing with releases is, process changes from release to release
- 12:16:40 < robcresswell> As as we're careful, I don't imagine there should be any huge issues. It's just a stable bugfix release.
- 12:16:41 < mrunge> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/ReleaseTeam/How_To_Release
- 12:16:51 < robcresswell> famous last words...
- 12:17:40 < mrunge> I'd be tagging doa release tomorrow then, if nothing else comes up
- 12:18:11 < itxaka> I think the workflow of doa -> bump reqs in horizon -> horizon should alliviate any concers tsufiev ?
- 12:18:44 < tsufiev> itxaka, no, just a little note: bump reqs in openstack/requirements, not in horizon
- 12:19:01 < tsufiev> then proposal bot will propose a requirements patch into horizon
- 12:19:35 < itxaka> sounds good to me
- 12:20:13 < itxaka> mrunge, this affects the liberty branch as well, patches are all merged in liberty (doa and horizon)
- 12:20:26 < mrunge> ack
- 12:21:47 < robcresswell> That's the only agenda items
- 12:22:00 < robcresswell> So: open discussion
- 12:24:20 < robcresswell> Anyone have any topics? Or we can have some time back :)
- 12:24:49 < mrunge> masco?
- 12:24:52 < mrunge> sigh
- 12:25:55 < r1chardj0n3s> hum, I disappeared for a bit there
- 12:25:55 < r1chardj0n3s> hope I didn't miss anything
- 12:26:00 < mrunge> not really, r1chardj0n3s
- 12:26:02 < robcresswell> Nothing much
- 12:26:16 < robcresswell> Anything you wanted to discuss? Otherwise I'm gonna call it
- 12:26:22 < r1chardj0n3s> might be worthwhile reminding folks of https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/horizon-mitaka-midcycle
- 12:26:28 < mrunge> call it then...
- 12:26:43 < r1chardj0n3s> reckon we might have a busy enough few days just trying to move code thru that's in play
- 12:26:52 < r1chardj0n3s> but just in case there's something you'd like to talk about
- 12:27:02 < r1chardj0n3s> (like angular patch size ;-)
- 12:27:03 < robcresswell> Yeah, I think we'll be focusing on paired coding and reviews it seems
- 12:27:16 < mrunge> oh, would it be possible to loop external folks in to midcycle?
- 12:27:24 < r1chardj0n3s> also, there's a global bugbash coming up
- 12:27:48 < robcresswell> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/OpenStack-Bug-Smash-Mitaka
- 12:27:49 < mrunge> angular patch size is indeed a concern of mine
- 12:28:08 < r1chardj0n3s> thanks robcresswell
- 12:28:20 < robcresswell> Good point. So this is very similar to our Horizon bug days
- 12:28:33 < r1chardj0n3s> feel free to pop over to Sydney and smash some bugs with us ... or go somewhere more local ;-)
- 12:28:43 < robcresswell> It would be good to get involved in the bug day. I'll be at the London location for at least a couple of the days
- 12:29:14 < r1chardj0n3s> robcresswell: say hi to Alex, who just joined the London office from Brisbane. She says it's cold over there. Who'd have thought.
- 12:29:48 < robcresswell> Ha, bad decision :p
- 12:30:06 < r1chardj0n3s> anyway, I don't have anything further, thanks
- 12:30:23 < r1chardj0n3s> going to bed before midnight sounds nice
- 12:30:31 < mrunge> masco, you had something to discuss?
- 12:30:50 < mrunge> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/255854/#
- 12:31:10 < masco> mrunge, https://review.openstack.org/#/c/255854/ i need ppl opinion on this
- 12:31:22 < masco> oh you are faster then me
- 12:31:33 < mrunge> hr hr hr
- 12:31:56 < mrunge> with that being said, I have to leave, unfortunately :P
- 12:32:24 < robcresswell> masco: Just reading
- 12:32:52 < mrunge> it was about to collect feedback, thoughts etc.
- 12:33:03 < mrunge> it seems to be a good addition, but some disagreement on implementation
- 12:34:00 < robcresswell> Yep reading comments
- 12:34:15 < doug-fish> David's suggestion seems good to me - does somebody not like that?
- 12:34:23 < tsufiev> masco, btw, what are your further plans on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/261930/ ?
- 12:34:32 < masco> i hope performance wise there will not be much problem
- 12:35:24 < masco> tsufiev, i think instead of deleting the field just hiding will help. am i right?
- 12:35:47 < tsufiev> masco, yes, should be a good approach
- 12:35:53 < masco> since integration needs the shared field
- 12:35:56 * tsufiev wonders why he didn't think about it
- 12:36:11 < masco> ok will submit a patch for that
- 12:36:17 < tsufiev> masco, awesome :)
- 12:36:30 < masco> tsufiev, :) even i too got this today
- 12:36:31 < robcresswell> Er, why is an individual user get memoized?
- 12:36:48 < robcresswell> Just scanning.
- 12:37:38 < robcresswell> I mean this seems like the memoized part is irrelevant if you're making multiple individual calls
- 12:37:47 < robcresswell> the id would change, no?
- 12:38:07 < masco> robcresswell, can change
- 12:38:25 < masco> i mean for different users
- 12:38:59 < robcresswell> It seems like it would be poor peformance would it not? just making api calls for each user
- 12:39:05 < robcresswell> As David noted.
- 12:39:40 < masco> yes, if each user is different
- 12:39:49 < robcresswell> I guess it depends on no. of users per instance. Hmm..
- 12:39:51 < masco> but practically it won't
- 12:40:00 < robcresswell> Yeah, it shouldnt be huge.
- 12:40:28 < masco> yes
- 12:40:39 < masco> so no worry for performance ;)
- 12:41:17 < robcresswell> Better speak with david then :)
- 12:41:46 < masco> robcresswell, sure. thanks. please add your points on it.
- 12:42:06 < masco> it will help for future reference :)
- 12:44:04 < robcresswell> Anyone else with discussion points?
- 12:44:09 < robcresswell> masco: Sure
- 12:45:41 < robcresswell> We'll end the meeting there, have 15 mins back :)
12:45:54 < masco> i don't have anything specific. but i just want request the core to review my QoS patches :)
