Jump to: navigation, search

Difference between revisions of "Meetings/Horizon"

(Agenda for Next Meeting)
(Agenda for Next Meeting)
Line 9: Line 9:
 
* Notices
 
* Notices
 
* Action items from the previous meeting
 
* Action items from the previous meeting
** horizon release model: cycle-with-milestone vs cycle-with-intermediary
+
* Community Goals
*** The infra change (zuulv3 configuration change) [1] now forces horizon plugin developers to handle horizon dependencies in a tricky way.
+
** mox => mock migration
**** The OpenStack CI installs horizon master (based on tox-siblings) and it works well, but local testing will fail because it installs horizon queens.
+
** Current status: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/horizon-unittest-mock-migration
**** This problem is based on a horizon version published to PyPI.
+
* horizon release model: cycle-with-milestone vs cycle-with-intermediary
**** horizon is a kind of library from perspective of horizon plugins. from this point, it is reasonable to publish horizon with cycle-with-intermediary.
+
** The infra change (zuulv3 configuration change) [1] now forces horizon plugin developers to handle horizon dependencies in a tricky way.
**** If so, the version of horizon would follow semantic versioning. It would help horizon plugin developers.
+
*** The OpenStack CI installs horizon master (based on tox-siblings) and it works well, but local testing will fail because it installs horizon queens.
**** However, the versioning might be surprising for horizon consumers like operators/users.
+
*** This problem is based on a horizon version published to PyPI.
*** horizon-lib again might be a good candidate on this problem.
+
*** horizon is a kind of library from perspective of horizon plugins. from this point, it is reasonable to publish horizon with cycle-with-intermediary.
*** [1] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2018-March/128310.html
+
*** If so, the version of horizon would follow semantic versioning. It would help horizon plugin developers.
 +
*** However, the versioning might be surprising for horizon consumers like operators/users.
 +
** horizon-lib again might be a good candidate on this problem.
 +
** [1] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2018-March/128310.html
 +
* Improve Horizon Testing
 +
** Blueprint https://blueprints.launchpad.net/horizon/+spec/improve-horizon-testing
 +
** Getting rid of Nose test runner
 +
** Open patches:
 +
*** https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+branch:master+topic:bp/improve-horizon-testing
 +
** Cross-project CI jobs to test plugins
 +
* Django 2 support
 +
** https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/django20-support
 +
** http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2018-May/130261.html
 +
* Horizon feature gap
 +
** https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/horizon-feature-gap
 +
* Review priority
 +
** https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/horizon-reviews-priority
 +
** Feel free to add your patches to the etherpad above
 
* Open Discussion
 
* Open Discussion
** Don't we discuss horizon release and versioning model any more? I see the topic was dropped from the meeting agenda... I don't want to add it for every meeting. (amotoki)
 

Revision as of 13:07, 16 May 2018

The OpenStack Horizon Team holds public meetings in #openstack-meeting-alt, weekly on Wednesdays at 1500 UTC.

See http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/#Horizon_Team_Meeting for recordings of previous meetings and the upcoming meeting schedule.

Everyone is encouraged to attend!

Agenda for Next Meeting