Jump to: navigation, search

Difference between revisions of "MONaaS"

m (Alexandre Viau moved page MaaS to MONaaS: avoid confusion with Canonical's Metal as a Service)
(Monitoring as a Service (blueprint))
 
(6 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
== Monitoring as a Service ([https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ceilometer/+spec/monitoring-as-a-service blueprint]) ==
 
== Monitoring as a Service ([https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ceilometer/+spec/monitoring-as-a-service blueprint]) ==
 +
 +
Take a look at the [https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/MONaaS Etherpad]!
  
 
'''Problem to solve''': Ceilometer's purpose is to track and *measure/meter* usage information collected from OpenStack components (originally for billing). While Ceilometer is usefull for the cloud operators and infrastructure metering, it is not a *monitoring* solution for the tenants and their services/applications running in the cloud because it does not allow for service/application-level monitoring and it ignores detailed and precise guest system metrics.
 
'''Problem to solve''': Ceilometer's purpose is to track and *measure/meter* usage information collected from OpenStack components (originally for billing). While Ceilometer is usefull for the cloud operators and infrastructure metering, it is not a *monitoring* solution for the tenants and their services/applications running in the cloud because it does not allow for service/application-level monitoring and it ignores detailed and precise guest system metrics.
  
'''Proposed solution''': We would like to add Monitoring as a Service to OpenStack
+
'''Proposed solution''': We would like to add Monitoring as a Service to OpenStack Telemetry
  
Just like Rackspace's Cloud monitoring, the new monitoring service - lets call it OpenStackMonitor for now -  would let users/tenants keep track of their ressources on the cloud and receive instant notifications when they require attention.
+
Just like Rackspace's Cloud monitoring, the new monitoring service would let users/tenants keep track of their ressources on the cloud and receive instant notifications when they require attention.
  
 
This RESTful API would enable users to create multiple monitors with predefined checks, such as PING, CPU usage, HTTPS and SMTP or custom checks performed by a Monitoring Agent on the instance they want to monitor.  
 
This RESTful API would enable users to create multiple monitors with predefined checks, such as PING, CPU usage, HTTPS and SMTP or custom checks performed by a Monitoring Agent on the instance they want to monitor.  
Line 11: Line 13:
 
Predefined checks such as CPU and disk usage could be polled from Ceilometer. Other predefined checks would be performed by the new monitoring service itself. Checks such as PING could be flagged to be performed from multiple sites.  
 
Predefined checks such as CPU and disk usage could be polled from Ceilometer. Other predefined checks would be performed by the new monitoring service itself. Checks such as PING could be flagged to be performed from multiple sites.  
  
Custom checks are performed by the optional Monitoring Agent. Their results would be polled by the monitoring service and stored in a backend (could be Ceilometer).
+
Custom checks would be performed by an optional Monitoring Agent. Their results would be polled by the monitoring service and stored in a backend (could be Ceilometer).
  
 
The project would start with API functions. In the future, it could be integrated into Horizon with statistics and graph functionalities.
 
The project would start with API functions. In the future, it could be integrated into Horizon with statistics and graph functionalities.
Line 23: Line 25:
 
'''Ressources''':
 
'''Ressources''':
  
Etherpad: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/MaaS
+
Rackspace Cloud monitoring: https://monitoring.api.rackspacecloud.com/
 +
 
 +
Rackspace Monitoring Agent : https://github.com/virgo-agent-toolkit/rackspace-monitoring-agent
  
Rackspace Cloud Monitoring: https://monitoring.api.rackspacecloud.com/
+
Rackspace Monitoring Agent Plugins : https://github.com/racker/rackspace-monitoring-agent-plugins-contrib
  
 
Nagios Ceilometer plugin: http://blog.zhaw.ch/icclab/nagios-ceilometer-integration-new-plugin-available/
 
Nagios Ceilometer plugin: http://blog.zhaw.ch/icclab/nagios-ceilometer-integration-new-plugin-available/
 +
 +
Nagios: http://www.nagios.org/
 +
 +
Shinken: http://www.shinken-monitoring.org/
 +
 +
Amazon CloudWatch: http://aws.amazon.com/fr/cloudwatch/
 +
 +
AWS CloudWatch command line : http://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonCloudWatch/latest/cli/cli-mon-put-data.html
 +
 +
Zabbix agent adoption mechanism: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Zabbix-agent-adoption
 +
 +
HP Jahmon: https://github.com/hpcloud-mon

Latest revision as of 17:59, 23 May 2014

Monitoring as a Service (blueprint)

Take a look at the Etherpad!

Problem to solve: Ceilometer's purpose is to track and *measure/meter* usage information collected from OpenStack components (originally for billing). While Ceilometer is usefull for the cloud operators and infrastructure metering, it is not a *monitoring* solution for the tenants and their services/applications running in the cloud because it does not allow for service/application-level monitoring and it ignores detailed and precise guest system metrics.

Proposed solution: We would like to add Monitoring as a Service to OpenStack Telemetry

Just like Rackspace's Cloud monitoring, the new monitoring service would let users/tenants keep track of their ressources on the cloud and receive instant notifications when they require attention.

This RESTful API would enable users to create multiple monitors with predefined checks, such as PING, CPU usage, HTTPS and SMTP or custom checks performed by a Monitoring Agent on the instance they want to monitor.

Predefined checks such as CPU and disk usage could be polled from Ceilometer. Other predefined checks would be performed by the new monitoring service itself. Checks such as PING could be flagged to be performed from multiple sites.

Custom checks would be performed by an optional Monitoring Agent. Their results would be polled by the monitoring service and stored in a backend (could be Ceilometer).

The project would start with API functions. In the future, it could be integrated into Horizon with statistics and graph functionalities.

Schemes:

Proposed MaaS architecture

300*300px

Ressources:

Rackspace Cloud monitoring: https://monitoring.api.rackspacecloud.com/

Rackspace Monitoring Agent : https://github.com/virgo-agent-toolkit/rackspace-monitoring-agent

Rackspace Monitoring Agent Plugins : https://github.com/racker/rackspace-monitoring-agent-plugins-contrib

Nagios Ceilometer plugin: http://blog.zhaw.ch/icclab/nagios-ceilometer-integration-new-plugin-available/

Nagios: http://www.nagios.org/

Shinken: http://www.shinken-monitoring.org/

Amazon CloudWatch: http://aws.amazon.com/fr/cloudwatch/

AWS CloudWatch command line : http://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonCloudWatch/latest/cli/cli-mon-put-data.html

Zabbix agent adoption mechanism: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Zabbix-agent-adoption

HP Jahmon: https://github.com/hpcloud-mon