Jump to: navigation, search

Difference between revisions of "Issues identified"

(Negative)
(Positive)
Line 32: Line 32:
 
=== Positive ===
 
=== Positive ===
 
* Users liked guided workflow
 
* Users liked guided workflow
 +
<br>
 
* Oddly, users did not complain about number of steps
 
* Oddly, users did not complain about number of steps
 +
<br>
 
* Individual steps where clear to users
 
* Individual steps where clear to users
 +
<br>
 
* Like that controls where responsive to previous selections,  
 
* Like that controls where responsive to previous selections,  
 
** e.g. Flavors were disabled based on the image selected
 
** e.g. Flavors were disabled based on the image selected

Revision as of 21:14, 4 August 2015

Negative

  • First step overwhelms users
    • too much controls/content on step!


  • Excessive scrolling
    • Maybe specific to first step
    • too many controls above transfer table


  • Create New volume control is confusing
    • Only makes sense to expert users that understand the purpose of creating a new volume
    • Is there a need for advanced features area?


  • Users not discovering the help icon
    • Especially on the configuration step


  • Need embedded workflows
    • For example, Networks


  • Transfer table is confusing to users
    • Confusion between multi and single select tables
    • Relationship between tables (available/allocated) is not clear


  • Confusion around NIC order
    • (Bug) up/down arrows aren't working
    • Do not understand how to arrange NIC order
    • Not clear why users need to arrange NIC order


  • In ability to download key pairs



Positive

  • Users liked guided workflow


  • Oddly, users did not complain about number of steps


  • Individual steps where clear to users


  • Like that controls where responsive to previous selections,
    • e.g. Flavors were disabled based on the image selected