Jump to: navigation, search

Difference between revisions of "Issues identified"

 
(8 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Negative
+
Apparently this is feedback on some Horizon usability concerns.
* In ability to download key pairs
+
 
* First step overwhelms users (too much information!)
+
=== Negative ===
* Having to scroll
+
* First step overwhelms users (including experienced users)
* The Create New volume control is confusing
+
** too much controls/content on step!
 +
<br>
 +
* Excessive scrolling
 +
** Maybe specific to first step
 +
** too many controls above transfer table
 +
<br>
 +
* Create New volume control is confusing
 
** Only makes sense to expert users that understand the purpose of creating a new volume
 
** Only makes sense to expert users that understand the purpose of creating a new volume
 +
** Is there a need for advanced features area?
 +
<br>
 
* Users not discovering the help icon
 
* Users not discovering the help icon
* *Especially on the configuration step
+
** Especially on the configuration step
 +
<br>
 
* Need embedded workflows
 
* Need embedded workflows
 
** For example, Networks
 
** For example, Networks
 +
<br>
 
* Transfer table is confusing to users
 
* Transfer table is confusing to users
* Need for area for advanced features
+
** Confusion between multi and single select tables
* Confusion between transfer tables and single select
+
** Relationship between tables (available/allocated) is not clear
 +
<br>
 
* Confusion around NIC order
 
* Confusion around NIC order
** (Bug) up/down arrows don’t work
+
** (Bug) up/down arrows aren't working
** Don’t know how to arrange order
+
** Do not understand how to arrange NIC order
** Not sure why they need to arrange order
+
** Not clear why users need to arrange NIC order
 +
<br>
 +
* Inability to download key pairs
 +
** Download shouldn't be allowed--do you mean upload?
 +
<br>
 +
<br>
  
Positive
+
=== Positive ===
* Liked guided workflow
+
* Users liked guided workflow
* Oddly, no complaints about number of steps
+
<br>
* The individual steps where clear
+
* Oddly, users did not complain about number of steps
* Like that controls where responsive to previous selections, e.g. Flavors were disabled based on the image selected
+
<br>
 +
* Individual steps where clear to users
 +
<br>
 +
* Like that controls where responsive to previous selections,  
 +
** e.g. Flavors were disabled based on the image selected

Latest revision as of 19:53, 6 August 2015

Apparently this is feedback on some Horizon usability concerns.

Negative

  • First step overwhelms users (including experienced users)
    • too much controls/content on step!


  • Excessive scrolling
    • Maybe specific to first step
    • too many controls above transfer table


  • Create New volume control is confusing
    • Only makes sense to expert users that understand the purpose of creating a new volume
    • Is there a need for advanced features area?


  • Users not discovering the help icon
    • Especially on the configuration step


  • Need embedded workflows
    • For example, Networks


  • Transfer table is confusing to users
    • Confusion between multi and single select tables
    • Relationship between tables (available/allocated) is not clear


  • Confusion around NIC order
    • (Bug) up/down arrows aren't working
    • Do not understand how to arrange NIC order
    • Not clear why users need to arrange NIC order


  • Inability to download key pairs
    • Download shouldn't be allowed--do you mean upload?



Positive

  • Users liked guided workflow


  • Oddly, users did not complain about number of steps


  • Individual steps where clear to users


  • Like that controls where responsive to previous selections,
    • e.g. Flavors were disabled based on the image selected