Difference between revisions of "Identity topology canvas"
(→Development) |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Identity Topology Idea == | == Identity Topology Idea == | ||
Providing a topological view of identity entities '''(domains, projects, groups, users and roles)''' aims openstack users to have a bird-eye-view of how identity is structured in their cloud. With Domains, Projects, Users, Groups and Roles, understanding the organization and relationship of these ideas can be difficult. So, to easily disposed of any complexity out of identity service, we should create a more graphic depiction of these relationships in a topological view something strongly like currently implemented network-topology canvas. | Providing a topological view of identity entities '''(domains, projects, groups, users and roles)''' aims openstack users to have a bird-eye-view of how identity is structured in their cloud. With Domains, Projects, Users, Groups and Roles, understanding the organization and relationship of these ideas can be difficult. So, to easily disposed of any complexity out of identity service, we should create a more graphic depiction of these relationships in a topological view something strongly like currently implemented network-topology canvas. | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Identity Topology UX Design == | ||
+ | At [https://invis.io/6Z4G9W7FC openstack invision identity topology project] , several different types of topology wireframes has been drawn: | ||
+ | * '''SVG based canvas''' | ||
+ | * '''Bootstrap based canvas''' | ||
+ | * '''Network topology based canvas (Forced graph)''' | ||
+ | |||
+ | The following three consecutive figures show these three types of different identity topology drawings: | ||
+ | |||
+ | figure 1 | ||
+ | figure 2 | ||
+ | figure 3 | ||
+ | |||
+ | The following table shows advantages and disadvantages of each types of canvas types: | ||
Revision as of 19:09, 3 November 2015
Identity Topology Idea
Providing a topological view of identity entities (domains, projects, groups, users and roles) aims openstack users to have a bird-eye-view of how identity is structured in their cloud. With Domains, Projects, Users, Groups and Roles, understanding the organization and relationship of these ideas can be difficult. So, to easily disposed of any complexity out of identity service, we should create a more graphic depiction of these relationships in a topological view something strongly like currently implemented network-topology canvas.
Identity Topology UX Design
At openstack invision identity topology project , several different types of topology wireframes has been drawn:
- SVG based canvas
- Bootstrap based canvas
- Network topology based canvas (Forced graph)
The following three consecutive figures show these three types of different identity topology drawings:
figure 1 figure 2 figure 3
The following table shows advantages and disadvantages of each types of canvas types:
Development
- Invision UX Design Wireframes: https://invis.io/6Z4G9W7FC
- Blueprint Page: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/horizon/+spec/identity-topology
- Draft Implementation: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/231284/