Jump to: navigation, search

Difference between revisions of "Horizon/Blueprint Reviews"

m (Current List of Blueprints for Review in Kilo (Review by Nov 27, 2014))
m (Reviewed Blueprints in Kilo (Review by Nov 27, 2014))
Line 10: Line 10:
  
 
* https://blueprints.launchpad.net/horizon/+spec/filtered-client-side-table -- drafting
 
* https://blueprints.launchpad.net/horizon/+spec/filtered-client-side-table -- drafting
 +
  
 
* https://blueprints.launchpad.net/horizon/+spec/launch-instance-floating-ip-allocation-association -- in review, needs author feedback
 
* https://blueprints.launchpad.net/horizon/+spec/launch-instance-floating-ip-allocation-association -- in review, needs author feedback
 
* https://blueprints.launchpad.net/horizon/+spec/metadata-widget-multivalue-selection -- in review, needs author feedback
 
* https://blueprints.launchpad.net/horizon/+spec/metadata-widget-multivalue-selection -- in review, needs author feedback
 +
  
 
* https://blueprints.launchpad.net/horizon/+spec/glance-metadata-definitions-base-admin-ui -- approved
 
* https://blueprints.launchpad.net/horizon/+spec/glance-metadata-definitions-base-admin-ui -- approved
Line 22: Line 24:
 
* https://blueprints.launchpad.net/horizon/+spec/volume-bootable-flag -- approved
 
* https://blueprints.launchpad.net/horizon/+spec/volume-bootable-flag -- approved
 
* https://blueprints.launchpad.net/horizon/+spec/volume-type-set-backend-name -- approved
 
* https://blueprints.launchpad.net/horizon/+spec/volume-type-set-backend-name -- approved
 +
  
 
* https://blueprints.launchpad.net/horizon/+spec/identity-rbac -- OBSOLETE
 
* https://blueprints.launchpad.net/horizon/+spec/identity-rbac -- OBSOLETE

Revision as of 19:04, 16 December 2014

The objective of this page is to draw attention to blueprints that currently need review. The desired result is that the core team reads through these before they are scheduled for the Kilo release. This will accomplish two things:

  • making sure the core team is on the same page for Kilo priorities
  • make sure that the content of the blueprints meet project goals and there aren't issues that should be resolved before scheduling

Please leave a comment of at least LGTM or +1 on the blueprint.

As always, input from outside the core team is also welcome and highly valued.

Reviewed Blueprints in Kilo (Review by Nov 27, 2014)




Next