Difference between revisions of "Meetings/TechnicalCommittee/Ceilometer Gap Coverage"
(Created page with "=== Concern #1: lack of an explicit project mission statement === * Actions: ** team wordsmithing of an appropriate mission statement: https://review.openstack.org/87526 * Dri...") |
(No difference)
|
Revision as of 12:58, 26 May 2014
Contents
- 1 Concern #1: lack of an explicit project mission statement
- 2 Concern #2: lack of user- and operator-oriented documentation
- 3 Concern #3: lack of coverage in integration tests
- 4 Concern #4: lack of production-readiness of sqlalchemy driver
- 5 Concern #5: lack of participation in Grenade-based upgrade testing
Concern #1: lack of an explicit project mission statement
- Actions:
- team wordsmithing of an appropriate mission statement: https://review.openstack.org/87526
- Driver: eglynn
Concern #2: lack of user- and operator-oriented documentation
- Actions:
- re-work RDO getting started guide in distro-agnostic form: http://openstack.redhat.com/CeilometerQuickStart
- discern operator preferences for documentation at summit operator feedback session: http://summit.openstack.org/cfp/details/177
- joint ceilometer/documentation summit session: http://summit.openstack.org/cfp/details/311
- Driver: ildikov
Concern #3: lack of coverage in integration tests
- Actions:
- detailed analysis of current coverage https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/ceilometer-tempest-status
- TL;DR: need to solve "performant only with the storage driver we don't gate on" conumdrum
- summit design session to address test strategy shortcomings http://summit.openstack.org/cfp/details/152
- Driver: nprivalova
Concern #4: lack of production-readiness of sqlalchemy driver
- Actions:
- summit design session to address inefficiencies inherent in the current data model: http://summit.openstack.org/cfp/details/163
- useful to pick Mike Bayer's brains also during this session: http://summit.openstack.org/cfp/details/157
- goal of allowing Juno-derived distros treat sqlalchemy as a first-class citizen
- detail on known issues and design considerations: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/ceilometer-sql
- Blueprints:
- Driver: gordc
Concern #5: lack of participation in Grenade-based upgrade testing
- Actions:
- grenade integration is fairly clear, no need for an explicit summit design session
- clarity on extrinsic versus instrinsic goals of ceilometer upgrade testing: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-tc/2014-April/000632.html
- Driver: cdent
