|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| | __NOTOC__ | | __NOTOC__ |
| − | <!-- ##master-page:[[ProposalTemplate]] --> | + | <!-- #REDIRECT Documentation/Copyright --> |
| − | <!-- #format wiki -->
| |
| − | <!-- #language en -->
| |
| − | | |
| − | == Governance/Proposed/Policy on Copyright and License headers ==
| |
| − | '''Time: ''' <<[[DateTime]](2012-08-16T12:22:40-0700)>>
| |
| − | | |
| − | '''Drafter: '''John Griffith
| |
| − | | |
| − | '''Drafters Email: ''' john.griffith@solidfire.com
| |
| − | | |
| − | '''Status: ''' To be completed by POC
| |
| − | | |
| − | Text of Proposal to POC
| |
| − | | |
| − | There was some discussion in the past regarding Copyright headers in [[OpenStack]] source files. I don't know that there was a clear decision, so here's a proposal based on ML feedback and personal preference.
| |
| − | | |
| − | 1. Adding a Copyright header is optional
| |
| − | Copyright headers are NOT required, however if you have contributed to a file and wish to add yourself/your company as a Copyright holder that's fine.
| |
| − | | |
| − | 2. The Openstack LLC Copyright should not be added as a default
| |
| − | Standard practice by many seems to be just throw in "Copyright Openstack LLC" and the Apache License header. I think it would be more appropriate that only the Apache header is added, and your own Copyright if you desire.
| |
| − | | |
| − | 3. Maintain individual/company Copyrights
| |
| − | When copying/modifying a file existing Copyright headers are maintained. A contributor may add themeselves to the list of Copyright holders, but may not remove any listed Copyright headings.
| |
| − | | |
| − | 4. No source files in the Openstack source tree should be without the Apache license header
| |
| − | | |
| − | ----
| |
| − | [[Category:Proposal]]
| |
