Jump to: navigation, search

Difference between revisions of "Governance/Foundation/TechnicalCommittee"

(Rev2)
(Adjusted to match the current proposed Foundation ByLaws)
Line 2: Line 2:
 
= Technical committee =
 
= Technical committee =
  
DRAFT FOR COMMENTS
+
Status: RFC
  
 
=== Mission ===
 
=== Mission ===
  
The Technical Committee (TC) is tasked with providing the technical leadership for the OpenStack project as a whole. It enforces OpenStack core projects ideals (Openness, Transparency, Commonality, Integration, Quality...), decides on issues affecting multiple projects, and generally forms an ultimate appeals board for technical decisions.
+
The Technical Committee ("TC") is tasked with providing the technical leadership for the OpenStack project as a whole. It enforces OpenStack core projects ideals (Openness, Transparency, Commonality, Integration, Quality...), decides on issues affecting multiple projects, and generally forms an ultimate appeals board for technical decisions.
 +
 
 +
The TC has control over which projects are considered OpenStack projects, including those in core incubation status. It recommends projects for final OpenStack Core addition, combination, split or deletion to the Board of Directors, which has sole authority to approve them.
  
 
=== Members ===
 
=== Members ===
  
 
The TC is composed of 9 elected members. You can cumulate other roles (Project technical lead, Foundation board member...) with a TC seat. Note that Project technical leads no longer get appointed seats to the TC: they should run for election.
 
The TC is composed of 9 elected members. You can cumulate other roles (Project technical lead, Foundation board member...) with a TC seat. Note that Project technical leads no longer get appointed seats to the TC: they should run for election.
 +
 +
=== Chair ===
 +
 +
After each election, the TC proposes one of its members to act as the TC chair. In case of multiple candidates, it may  use a single-winner election to decide the result. The Board of Directors has the authority to approve the TC chair and shall approve the proposition, unless otherwise justified by its bylaws. The TC chair is responsible for making sure meetings are held according to the rules described below, and for communicating the decisions taken during those meetings to the Board of Directors and the OpenStack community at large.
  
 
=== Meeting ===
 
=== Meeting ===

Revision as of 10:17, 27 June 2012

Technical committee

Status: RFC

Mission

The Technical Committee ("TC") is tasked with providing the technical leadership for the OpenStack project as a whole. It enforces OpenStack core projects ideals (Openness, Transparency, Commonality, Integration, Quality...), decides on issues affecting multiple projects, and generally forms an ultimate appeals board for technical decisions.

The TC has control over which projects are considered OpenStack projects, including those in core incubation status. It recommends projects for final OpenStack Core addition, combination, split or deletion to the Board of Directors, which has sole authority to approve them.

Members

The TC is composed of 9 elected members. You can cumulate other roles (Project technical lead, Foundation board member...) with a TC seat. Note that Project technical leads no longer get appointed seats to the TC: they should run for election.

Chair

After each election, the TC proposes one of its members to act as the TC chair. In case of multiple candidates, it may use a single-winner election to decide the result. The Board of Directors has the authority to approve the TC chair and shall approve the proposition, unless otherwise justified by its bylaws. The TC chair is responsible for making sure meetings are held according to the rules described below, and for communicating the decisions taken during those meetings to the Board of Directors and the OpenStack community at large.

Meeting

TC meetings happen publicly, weekly on IRC. The meeting time should be decided among TC members after each election. If there isn't consensus on a meeting time, the option of rotating the time weekly should be explored. The TC maintains an open agenda on the wiki. A TC meeting is called if anything is posted to that wiki at least one day before the meeting time. For a meeting to be actually held, at least two thirds of the members need to be present (6 people). Non-members, in particular unelected PTLs or release manager, are strongly encouraged to participate to the meeting and voice their opinion on subjects that affect them, though only elected TC members can ultimately cast a vote.

Motions

Before being put to a vote, motions presented before the TC should be discussed publicly on the mailing-list[1] for a minimum of 5 days to give a chance to the wider community to express their opinion. Members can vote positively, negatively, or abstain. Decisions need more positive votes than negative votes, and a minimum of 3 positive votes.

Proxying

When a TC member is unable to make a meeting, he is encouraged to name a proxy that will represent his opinion and vote on his behalf during the meeting. Only members really present at the meeting (directly or proxied) can vote.

Election

The TC is renewed every 6 months using staggered elections: 5 seats are renewed every 6 months. In order to ensure fairness and representativity, the election is run on CIVS, using a Condorcet Schulze algorithm with the proportional representation option enabled. People ranking 1st to 4th get elected for a one-year term. The 5th person gets elected for a 6-month term.

Voters and Candidates

The voters are the Technical members[2] of the Foundation. Any Technical member can propose his candidacy for a TC seat.

Initial election

To initially populate the TC, all 9 seats are up for election. People ranking 1st to 4th get elected for one year. People ranking 5th to 9th get elected for 6 months[3].

Notes

  1. Could be the openstack ML or a specific TC ML. The idea is to avoid surprising the community with a decision, and avoid the usual kabbale critics.
  2. Two options here: make anyone who committed to one of the official OpenStack projects (core projects + docs + CI + ...) a Technical member of the Foundation, or set up a separate Technical Membership Committee to define rules and handle corner cases. In both cases we could require some currency in the contribution (for example you lose membership if you didn't commit anything over a year).
  3. We may want to re-align elections with release cycles. Example: If TC is created in July 2012, we may want to align elections with the next design summits, so the first term only be 2 months or 8 months.