Difference between revisions of "Governance/Foundation/IncubationUpdate2013"
< Governance | Foundation
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
December 6th Committee Meeting Agenda | December 6th Committee Meeting Agenda | ||
+ | |||
+ | (Topic - Topic Leader) | ||
+ | |||
+ | # Introductions - [[AlanClark]] | ||
+ | # Keeping community updated and involved - [[AlanClark]] | ||
+ | # Future meeting logistics: dates/times/frequency - [[AlanClark]] | ||
+ | # Review of the current Incubator process - Mark [[McLoughlin]] | ||
+ | # How the TC and Board see the project growing over time | ||
+ | # What "Core" currently means and why the term is causing confusion | ||
+ | ## Learning from others: Should we invite LSB, Eclipse or ASF to discuss how they address this similar question? | ||
+ | # The criteria we think we should apply when considering proposals <<BR>> for projects to be included in [[OpenStack]] | ||
+ | # What we expect from Incubating projects, how we help them and how <<BR>> we decide whether they're ready to graduate | ||
+ | # How we can keep the concept of a project being "part of the <<BR>> [[OpenStack]] project" separate from the concept of "required in all <<BR>> [[OpenStack]](tm) clouds"<<BR>> |
Revision as of 22:32, 3 December 2012
December 6th Committee Meeting Agenda
(Topic - Topic Leader)
- Introductions - AlanClark
- Keeping community updated and involved - AlanClark
- Future meeting logistics: dates/times/frequency - AlanClark
- Review of the current Incubator process - Mark McLoughlin
- How the TC and Board see the project growing over time
- What "Core" currently means and why the term is causing confusion
- Learning from others: Should we invite LSB, Eclipse or ASF to discuss how they address this similar question?
- The criteria we think we should apply when considering proposals <
> for projects to be included in OpenStack - What we expect from Incubating projects, how we help them and how <
> we decide whether they're ready to graduate - How we can keep the concept of a project being "part of the <
> OpenStack project" separate from the concept of "required in all <
> OpenStack(tm) clouds"<
>