Jump to: navigation, search

Glance-v2-v1-client-compatability

Revision as of 16:04, 15 September 2015 by Niall Bunting (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

This is an overview of the effects of the non-backwards compatibility of the prospective 1.0.0 glance client (which defaults to v2) on existing glance cli scripts.

Note: "Input compatible: No" means that any existing glance cli script with the specified arguments will fail with the new client.

Note: "Output compatible: No" means that the output to stdout is missing some fields, or ordering is reversed. Scripts relying on those fields/order being the same in the output will fail.

command sub-command Input Compatible Output Compatible Notes
image-create Yes No Slightly different output
image-create Yes No Slightly different output
image-create --id Yes No Slightly different output
image-create --name Yes No Slightly different output
image-create --owner No No Slightly different output
image-create --size No Not implemented in v2 client
image-create --store No Not implemented in v2 client
image-create --min-disk Yes No Slightly different output
image-create --min-ram Yes No Slightly different output
image-create --location No Not implemented in v2 client
image-create --owner Yes No Slightly different output
image-create --file Yes No Slightly different output
image-create --checksum No Not implemented in v2 client
image-create --copy-from No Not implemented in v2 server
image-create --is-public No Replaced with --visibility in v2 client
image-create --is-protected No Not implemented in v2 client
image-create --property Yes No Slightly different output
image-create --progress Yes No Slightly different output
command sub-command Input Compatible Output Compatible Notes
image-delete <IMAGE_UUID> No Yes v2 client cannot accept more than one image to delete
image-delete <IMAGE_NAME> No v2 client does not accept a name
command sub-command Input Compatible Output Compatible Notes
image-download <IMAGE_UUID> Yes Yes Note: bug 1488914
image-download <IMAGE_NAME> No v2 client does not accept an image name.
image-download --file Yes Yes
image-download --progress Yes Yes
command sub-command Input Compatible Output Compatible Notes
image-list Yes No v2 client displays fewer fields
image-list --verbose Yes No v2 client displays fewer fields
image-list --name No Not implemented in v2 client
image-list --status No Not implemented in v2 client
image-list --container-format No Not implemented in v2 client
image-list --disk-format No Not implemented in v2 client
image-list --size-min No Not implemented in v2 client
image-list --size-max No Not implemented in v2 client
image-list --property-filter Yes No v2 client displays fewer fields
image-list --page-fize Yes No v2 client displays fewer fields
image-list --human-readable No Not implemented in v2 client
image-list --sort-key Yes No v2 client sorts in the opposite direction
image-list --sort-dir Yes No v2 client displays fewer fields
image-list --is-public No Not implemented in v2 client (ignored/broken in v1?)
image-list --owner Yes No v2 client displays fewer fields
image-list --all-tenants No Not implemented in v2 client
command sub-command Input Compatible Output Compatible Notes
image-show <IMAGE_UUID> Yes No Slightly different output
image-show <IMAGE_NAME> No v2 client does not accept a name
image-show --human-readable Yes No Slightly different output
image-show --max-column-width Yes No Slightly different output
command sub-command Input Compatible Output Compatible Notes
image-update <IMAGE_UUID> Yes No Slightly different output
image-update <IMAGE_NAME> No v2 client does not accept a name.
image-update <data on stdin> No No v2 client ignores data on stdin
image-update --name Yes No Slightly different output
image-update --disk-format Yes No Slightly different output
image-update --container-format Yes No Slightly different output
image-update --owner Yes No Slightly different output . (v1 returns 0 indicating success -- bug?)
image-update --container-format Yes No Slightly different output
image-update --size No Not implemented in v2 client
image-update --min-disk Yes No Slightly different output
image-update --min-ram Yes No Slightly different output
image-update --location No Not implemented in v2 client
image-update --file No Not implemented in v2 client
image-update --checksum No Not implemented in v2 client
image-update --copy-from No Not implemented in v2 client
image-update --is-public No Not implemented in v2 client (Replaced with visibility)
image-update --is-protected No Not implemented in v2 client
image-update --property Yes No Slightly different output
image-update --purge-props No Not implemented in v2 server
image-update --human-readable No Not implemented in v2 client
image-update --progress No Not implemented in v2 client
command sub-command Input Compatible Output Compatible Notes
member-create <IMAGE_UUID> Yes Yes displays additional output
member-create <IMAGE_NAME> No v2 client does not support a name
member-create --can-share No Not implemented in v2 client (server?)
command sub-command Input Compatible Output Compatible Notes
member-delete <IMAGE_UUID> Yes Yes
member-delete <IMAGE_NAME> No v2 client does not support a name
command sub-command Input Compatible Output Compatible Notes
member-list --image-id Yes No v2 client displays different output
member-list --tenant-id No Not implemented in v2 client