Jump to: navigation, search

Difference between revisions of "Ceilometer-batch-consumption"

Line 20: Line 20:
 
The intention is to create the ability for all message collection pipelines in ceilometer to use batching if so desired. The initial implementation will focus on notification collection.
 
The intention is to create the ability for all message collection pipelines in ceilometer to use batching if so desired. The initial implementation will focus on notification collection.
  
<gallery>
 
 
File:Batch notification.jpg|Proposed Data Flow
 
File:Batch notification.jpg|Proposed Data Flow
</gallery>
 
  
 
== Implementation ==
 
== Implementation ==

Revision as of 21:08, 10 January 2014

  • Launchpad Entry: CeilometerSpec:use-bulk-notification
  • Created: 09 Jan 2014
  • Contributors: John Herndon <john.herndon@hp.com>

Summary

Currently, ceilometer handles notifications one at a time. Individual events are inserted into the storage back-end, individual notifications are handled as meters, etc. In many cases, it is more efficient to handle notifications many at a time, in a batch. This blueprint proposes a way to do that.

Release Note

Rationale

User stories

Assumptions

Design

The intention is to create the ability for all message collection pipelines in ceilometer to use batching if so desired. The initial implementation will focus on notification collection.

File:Batch notification.jpg|Proposed Data Flow

Implementation

UI Changes

Code Changes

Migration

Include:

  • data migration, if any
  • redirects from old URLs to new ones, if any
  • how users will be pointed to the new way of doing things, if necessary.

Test/Demo Plan

This need not be added or completed until the specification is nearing beta.

Unresolved issues

This should highlight any issues that should be addressed in further specifications, and not problems with the specification itself; since any specification with problems cannot be approved.

BoF agenda and discussion

Use this section to take notes during the BoF; if you keep it in the approved spec, use it for summarising what was discussed and note any options that were rejected.