Jump to: navigation, search

Difference between revisions of "Barbican/Policy"

(Updating fields post audit meeting.)
Line 7: Line 7:
 
! Route !! Method !! reader !! member !! admin !! reader !! member !! admin || no auth || Tag || RBAC Name || Notes
 
! Route !! Method !! reader !! member !! admin !! reader !! member !! admin || no auth || Tag || RBAC Name || Notes
 
|-
 
|-
−
| /    || GET || x || x || x || x || x || x || x || <s>key_manager:get_home</s> (none) || N/A || No restrictions on this route
+
| /    || GET || || || || || || || x || <s>key_manager:get_home</s> (none) || N/A || No restrictions on this route
−
(dmend) There is none.  This route is wide open for anyone to use.
 
 
|-
 
|-
−
| /v1 || GET || x || x || x || x || x || x || x || <s>key_manager:get_v1</s> (none) || N/A || No restrictions on this route
+
| /v1 || GET || || || || || || || x || <s>key_manager:get_v1</s> (none) || N/A || No restrictions on this route
 
|-
 
|-
−
| rowspan="2" | /v1/secrets || GET || x || x || x ||  ||  ||  ||  || key_manager:list_secrets || secrets:get ||
+
| rowspan="2" | /v1/secrets || GET || x || || ||  ||  ||  ||  || key_manager:list_secrets || secrets:get ||
 
|-
 
|-
−
| POST ||  || x || x ||  ||  ||  ||  || key_manager:store_secrets || secrets:post ||
+
| POST ||  || x || ||  ||  ||  ||  || key_manager:store_secrets || secrets:post ||
 
|-
 
|-
−
| rowspan="3" | /v1/secrets/{secret-id} || GET || || x || x ||  ||  ||  ||  || key_manager:get_secret_meta || secret:get || Marked as deprecated. Is this slotted to be removed?
+
| rowspan="3" | /v1/secrets/{secret-id} || GET || x || || ||  ||  ||  ||  || key_manager:get_secret_meta || secret:get || Marked as deprecated. Is this slotted to be removed?
−
(dmend) An earlier version of this table made the distinction between different Accept headers.  There are two code paths for this route depending on the Accept header.  One of those code paths is deprecated, the other is not.
+
(dmend) An earlier version of this table made the distinction between different Accept headers.  There are two code paths for this route depending on the Accept header.  One of those code paths is deprecated, the other is not. (hrybacki) Lets create a user story for deleting the unused/deprecated route.
 
|-
 
|-
−
| PUT ||  || x || x ||  ||  ||  ||  || key_manager:store_secrets || secret:put ||
+
| PUT ||  || x || ||  ||  ||  ||  || key_manager:store_secrets || secret:put ||
 
|-
 
|-
 
| DELETE ||  ||  || x ||  ||  ||  ||  || key_manager:delete_secrets || secret:delete ||
 
| DELETE ||  ||  || x ||  ||  ||  ||  || key_manager:delete_secrets || secret:delete ||
 
|-
 
|-
−
| rowspan="4" | /v1/secrets/{secret-id}/acl || GET || x || x || x ||  ||  ||  ||  || key_manager:get_acl || secret_acls:get ||
+
| rowspan="4" | /v1/secrets/{secret-id}/acl || GET || x || || ||  ||  ||  ||  || key_manager:get_acl || secret_acls:get ||
 
|-
 
|-
−
| PATCH ||  || x || x ||  ||  ||  ||  || key_manager:manage_acl || secret_acls:put_patch ||
+
| PATCH ||  || x || ||  ||  ||  ||  || key_manager:manage_acl || secret_acls:put_patch ||
 
|-
 
|-
−
| PUT ||  || x || x ||  ||  ||  ||  || key_manager:manage_acl || secret_acls:put_patch ||
+
| PUT ||  || x || ||  ||  ||  ||  || key_manager:manage_acl || secret_acls:put_patch ||
 
|-
 
|-
−
| DELETE  ||  || x || x ||  ||  ||  ||  || key_manager:manage_acl || secret_acls:delete ||
+
| DELETE  ||  || x || ||  ||  ||  ||  || key_manager:manage_acl || secret_acls:delete ||
 
|-
 
|-
−
| rowspan="3" | /v1/secrets/{secret-id}/metadata || GET || x || x || x ||  ||  ||  ||  || key_manager:get_secret_meta || secret_meta:get || Note: rule is used twice, consider breaking apart
+
| rowspan="3" | /v1/secrets/{secret-id}/metadata || GET || x || || ||  ||  ||  ||  || key_manager:get_secret_meta || secret_meta:get || Note: rule is used twice, consider breaking apart
 
|-
 
|-
−
| PUT ||  || x || x ||  ||  ||  ||  || key_manager:store_secrets || secret_meta:put || Note: rule is used twice, consider breaking apart
+
| PUT ||  || x || ||  ||  ||  ||  || key_manager:store_secrets || secret_meta:put || Note: rule is used twice, consider breaking apart
 
|-
 
|-
−
| POST ||  || x || x ||  ||  ||  ||  || key_manager:store_secrets || secret_meta:post ||
+
| POST ||  || x || ||  ||  ||  ||  || key_manager:store_secrets || secret_meta:post ||
 
|-
 
|-
−
| rowspan="3" | /v1/secrets/{secret-id}/metadata/{meta-key} || GET || x || x || x ||  ||  ||  ||  || key_manager:get_secret_meta || secret_meta:get || Note: rule is used twice, consider breaking apart
+
| rowspan="3" | /v1/secrets/{secret-id}/metadata/{meta-key} || GET || x || || ||  ||  ||  ||  || key_manager:get_secret_meta || secret_meta:get || Note: rule is used twice, consider breaking apart
 
|-
 
|-
−
| PUT ||  || x || x ||  ||  ||  ||  || key_manager:store_secrets || secret_meta:put || Note: rule is used twice, consider breaking apart
+
| PUT ||  || x || ||  ||  ||  ||  || key_manager:store_secrets || secret_meta:put || Note: rule is used twice, consider breaking apart
 
|-
 
|-
−
| DELETE ||  || x || x ||  ||  ||  ||  || key_manager:delete_secret_meta || secret_meta:delete ||
+
| DELETE ||  || x || ||  ||  ||  ||  || key_manager:delete_secret_meta || secret_meta:delete ||
 
|-
 
|-
−
| /v1/secrets/{secret-id}/payload || GET ||  || x || x ||  ||  ||  ||  || key_manager:decrypt_secrets || secret:decrypt ||
+
| /v1/secrets/{secret-id}/payload || GET ||  || x || ||  ||  ||  ||  || key_manager:decrypt_secrets || secret:decrypt ||
 
|-
 
|-
−
| rowspan="2" | /v1/transport_keys || GET || x || x || x || x || x || x ||  || key_manager:list_transport_keys || transport_keys:get ||
+
| rowspan="2" | /v1/transport_keys || GET || x || || || x || || ||  || key_manager:list_transport_keys || transport_keys:get ||
 
|-
 
|-
 
| POST ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  || x ||  || key_manager:add_transport_keys || transport_keys:post ||
 
| POST ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  || x ||  || key_manager:add_transport_keys || transport_keys:post ||
 
|-
 
|-
−
| rowspan="2" | /v1/transport_keys/{key-id} || GET || x || x || x || x || x || x ||  || key_manager:get_transport_keys || transport_key:get ||
+
| rowspan="2" | /v1/transport_keys/{key-id} || GET || x || || || x || ||  ||  || key_manager:get_transport_keys || transport_key:get ||
 
|-
 
|-
 
| DELETE ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  || x ||  || key_manager:delete_transport_keys || transport_key:delete ||
 
| DELETE ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  || x ||  || key_manager:delete_transport_keys || transport_key:delete ||
 
|-
 
|-
−
| rowspan="2" | /v1/containers || GET || x || x || x ||  ||  ||  ||  || key_manager:list_containers || containers:get ||
+
| rowspan="2" | /v1/containers || GET || x || || ||  ||  ||  ||  || key_manager:list_containers || containers:get ||
 
|-
 
|-
−
| POST ||  || x || x ||  ||  ||  ||  || key_manager:create_containers || containers:post ||
+
| POST ||  || x || ||  ||  ||  ||  || key_manager:create_containers || containers:post ||
 
|-
 
|-
−
| rowspan="2" | /v1/containers/{container-id} || GET || || x || x ||  ||  ||  ||  || key_manager:get_containers || container:get ||
+
| rowspan="2" | /v1/containers/{container-id} || GET || x || || ||  ||  ||  ||  || key_manager:get_containers || container:get ||
 
|-
 
|-
 
| DELETE ||  ||  || x ||  ||  ||  ||  || key_manager:delete_containers || container:delete ||
 
| DELETE ||  ||  || x ||  ||  ||  ||  || key_manager:delete_containers || container:delete ||
 
|-
 
|-
−
| rowspan="4" | /v1/containers/{container-id}/acl || GET || x || x || x ||  ||  ||  ||  || key_manager:get_acl || container_acls:get ||
+
| rowspan="4" | /v1/containers/{container-id}/acl || GET || x || || ||  ||  ||  ||  || key_manager:get_acl || container_acls:get ||
 
|-
 
|-
−
| PATCH ||  || x || x ||  ||  ||  ||  || key_manager:manage_acl || container_acls:put_patch ||
+
| PATCH ||  || x || ||  ||  ||  ||  || key_manager:manage_acl || container_acls:put_patch ||
 
|-
 
|-
−
| PUT ||  || x || x ||  ||  ||  ||  || key_manager:manage_acl || container_acls:put_patch ||
+
| PUT ||  || x || ||  ||  ||  ||  || key_manager:manage_acl || container_acls:put_patch ||
 
|-
 
|-
−
| DELETE ||  || x || x ||  ||  ||  ||  || key_manager:manage_acl || container_acls:delete || Should this be on the 'consumeR' controller rather than the 'consumerS' controller?
+
| DELETE ||  || x || ||  ||  ||  ||  || key_manager:manage_acl || container_acls:delete ||
 
|-
 
|-
−
| /v1/containers/{container-id}/consumers/{consumer-id} || GET || ||  ||  || ||  ||  ||  || key_manager:list_container_consumer || consumer:get ||
+
| rowspan="2" | /v1/containers/{container-id}/consumers/{consumer-id} || GET || x ||  ||  || x ||  ||  ||  || key_manager:list_container_consumer || consumer:get ||
 
|-
 
|-
−
| rowspan="3" | /v1/containers/{container-id}/consumers || GET || x || x || x ||  || ||  ||  || key_manager:list_container_consumers || consumers:get ||
+
| DELETE || || x || ||  || x ||  ||  || key_manager:list_container_consumers || consumers:delete || Should we rename this policy as consumeR:delete rather than consumerS:delete?
 
|-
 
|-
−
| POST || ||  ||  || ||  ||  ||  || key_manager:list_container_consumers || consumers:post ||
+
| rowspan="2" | /v1/containers/{container-id}/consumers || GET || x ||  ||  || x ||  ||  ||  || key_manager:list_container_consumers || consumers:get ||
 
|-
 
|-
−
| DELETE ||  || ||  ||  || ||  ||  || key_manager:list_container_consumers || consumers:delete ||
+
| POST ||  || x ||  ||  || x ||  ||  || key_manager:list_container_consumers || consumers:post ||
 
|-
 
|-
−
| rowspan="2" | /v1/containers/{container-id}/secrets || POST ||  || x || x ||  ||  ||  ||  || key_manager:create_containers || container_secret:post ||
+
| rowspan="2" | /v1/containers/{container-id}/secrets || POST ||  || x || ||  ||  ||  ||  || key_manager:create_containers || container_secret:post ||
 
|-
 
|-
 
| DELETE  ||  ||  || x ||  ||  ||  ||  || key_manager:delete_containers || container_secret:delete ||
 
| DELETE  ||  ||  || x ||  ||  ||  ||  || key_manager:delete_containers || container_secret:delete ||
 
|-
 
|-
−
| /v1/secret-stores || GET || x || x || x || x || x || x ||  || key_manager:list_backends || secretstores:get ||
+
| /v1/secret-stores || GET || x || || || x || || ||  || key_manager:list_backends || secretstores:get ||
 
|-
 
|-
−
| /v1/secret-stores/global-default || GET || x || x || x || x || x || x ||  || key_manager:list_backends || secretstores:get_global_default ||
+
| /v1/secret-stores/global-default || GET || x || || || x || || ||  || key_manager:list_backends || secretstores:get_global_default ||
 
|-
 
|-
−
| /v1/secret-stores/preferred || GET || x || x || x ||  ||  ||  ||  || key_manager:get_preferred_backend || secretstores:get_preferred ||
+
| /v1/secret-stores/preferred || GET || x || || ||  ||  ||  ||  || key_manager:get_preferred_backend || secretstores:get_preferred ||
 
|-
 
|-
−
| /v1/secret-stores/{ss-id} || GET || x || x || x || x || x || x ||  || key_manager:list_backends || secretstore:get ||
+
| /v1/secret-stores/{ss-id} || GET || x || || || x || || ||  || key_manager:list_backends || secretstore:get ||
 
|-
 
|-
 
| rowspan="2" | /v1/secret-stores/{ss-id}/preferred || POST ||  ||  || x ||  ||  ||  ||  || key_manager:manage_preferred_backend || secretstores_preferred:post ||
 
| rowspan="2" | /v1/secret-stores/{ss-id}/preferred || POST ||  ||  || x ||  ||  ||  ||  || key_manager:manage_preferred_backend || secretstores_preferred:post ||
Line 93: Line 92:
 
| DELETE ||  ||  || x ||  ||  ||  ||  || key_manager:manage_preferred_backend || secretstores_preferred:delete ||
 
| DELETE ||  ||  || x ||  ||  ||  ||  || key_manager:manage_preferred_backend || secretstores_preferred:delete ||
 
|-
 
|-
−
| /v1/quotas || GET  || x || x || x ||  ||  ||  ||  || key_manager:list_quotas || quotas:get ||
+
| /v1/quotas || GET  || x || || ||  ||  ||  ||  || key_manager:list_quotas || quotas:get ||
 
|-
 
|-
−
| /v1/project-quotas || GET ||  ||  ||  || x || x || x ||  || key_manager:get_system_quotas || project_quotas:get ||
+
| /v1/project-quotas || GET ||  ||  ||  || x || || ||  || key_manager:get_system_quotas || project_quotas:get ||
 
|-
 
|-
−
| rowspan="3" | /v1/project-quotas/{project-id} || GET  ||  ||  ||  || x || x || x ||  || key_manager:get_system_quotas || project_quotas:get ||
+
| rowspan="3" | /v1/project-quotas/{project-id} || GET  ||  ||  ||  || x || || ||  || key_manager:get_system_quotas || project_quotas:get ||
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
 
|-
−
| PUT ||  ||  ||  ||  || x || x ||  || key_manager:set_system_quotas || project_quotas:put ||
+
| PUT ||  ||  ||  ||  || x || ||  || key_manager:set_system_quotas || project_quotas:put ||
 
|-
 
|-
−
| DELETE ||  ||  ||  ||  || x || x ||  || key_manager:set_system_quotas || project_quotas:delete ||
+
| DELETE ||  ||  ||  ||  || x || ||  || key_manager:set_system_quotas || project_quotas:delete ||
 
|-
 
|-
−
| rowspan="3" | /v1/orders || GET || x || x || x ||  ||  ||  ||  || key_manager:list_orders || orders:get ||
+
| rowspan="3" | /v1/orders || GET || x || || ||  ||  ||  ||  || key_manager:list_orders || orders:get ||
 
|-
 
|-
−
| PUT ||  || x || x ||  ||  ||  ||  || key_manager:submit_orders || orders:put || This call is missing from the API reference: https://docs.openstack.org/barbican/latest/api/reference/orders.html. Perhaps it needs to be removed: https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2002579
+
| PUT ||  || x || ||  ||  ||  ||  || key_manager:submit_orders || orders:put || This call is missing from the API reference: https://docs.openstack.org/barbican/latest/api/reference/orders.html. Perhaps it needs to be removed: https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2002579
 
|-
 
|-
−
| POST ||  || x || x ||  ||  ||  ||  || key_manager:submit_orders || orders:post ||
+
| POST ||  || x || ||  ||  ||  ||  || key_manager:submit_orders || orders:post ||
 
|-
 
|-
−
| rowspan="2"  | /v1/orders/{order-id} || GET || x || x || x ||  ||  ||  ||  || key_manager:get_orders || order:get ||
+
| rowspan="2"  | /v1/orders/{order-id} || GET || x || || ||  ||  ||  ||  || key_manager:get_orders || order:get ||
 
|-
 
|-
 
| DELETE ||  ||  || x ||  ||  ||  ||  || key_manager:delete_orders || order:delete ||
 
| DELETE ||  ||  || x ||  ||  ||  ||  || key_manager:delete_orders || order:delete ||

Revision as of 15:54, 27 June 2018

Project-scope System-scope
Route Method reader member admin reader member admin no auth Tag RBAC Name Notes
/ GET x key_manager:get_home (none) N/A No restrictions on this route
/v1 GET x key_manager:get_v1 (none) N/A No restrictions on this route
/v1/secrets GET x key_manager:list_secrets secrets:get
POST x key_manager:store_secrets secrets:post
/v1/secrets/{secret-id} GET x key_manager:get_secret_meta secret:get Marked as deprecated. Is this slotted to be removed?

(dmend) An earlier version of this table made the distinction between different Accept headers. There are two code paths for this route depending on the Accept header. One of those code paths is deprecated, the other is not. (hrybacki) Lets create a user story for deleting the unused/deprecated route.

PUT x key_manager:store_secrets secret:put
DELETE x key_manager:delete_secrets secret:delete
/v1/secrets/{secret-id}/acl GET x key_manager:get_acl secret_acls:get
PATCH x key_manager:manage_acl secret_acls:put_patch
PUT x key_manager:manage_acl secret_acls:put_patch
DELETE x key_manager:manage_acl secret_acls:delete
/v1/secrets/{secret-id}/metadata GET x key_manager:get_secret_meta secret_meta:get Note: rule is used twice, consider breaking apart
PUT x key_manager:store_secrets secret_meta:put Note: rule is used twice, consider breaking apart
POST x key_manager:store_secrets secret_meta:post
/v1/secrets/{secret-id}/metadata/{meta-key} GET x key_manager:get_secret_meta secret_meta:get Note: rule is used twice, consider breaking apart
PUT x key_manager:store_secrets secret_meta:put Note: rule is used twice, consider breaking apart
DELETE x key_manager:delete_secret_meta secret_meta:delete
/v1/secrets/{secret-id}/payload GET x key_manager:decrypt_secrets secret:decrypt
/v1/transport_keys GET x x key_manager:list_transport_keys transport_keys:get
POST x key_manager:add_transport_keys transport_keys:post
/v1/transport_keys/{key-id} GET x x key_manager:get_transport_keys transport_key:get
DELETE x key_manager:delete_transport_keys transport_key:delete
/v1/containers GET x key_manager:list_containers containers:get
POST x key_manager:create_containers containers:post
/v1/containers/{container-id} GET x key_manager:get_containers container:get
DELETE x key_manager:delete_containers container:delete
/v1/containers/{container-id}/acl GET x key_manager:get_acl container_acls:get
PATCH x key_manager:manage_acl container_acls:put_patch
PUT x key_manager:manage_acl container_acls:put_patch
DELETE x key_manager:manage_acl container_acls:delete
/v1/containers/{container-id}/consumers/{consumer-id} GET x x key_manager:list_container_consumer consumer:get
DELETE x x key_manager:list_container_consumers consumers:delete Should we rename this policy as consumeR:delete rather than consumerS:delete?
/v1/containers/{container-id}/consumers GET x x key_manager:list_container_consumers consumers:get
POST x x key_manager:list_container_consumers consumers:post
/v1/containers/{container-id}/secrets POST x key_manager:create_containers container_secret:post
DELETE x key_manager:delete_containers container_secret:delete
/v1/secret-stores GET x x key_manager:list_backends secretstores:get
/v1/secret-stores/global-default GET x x key_manager:list_backends secretstores:get_global_default
/v1/secret-stores/preferred GET x key_manager:get_preferred_backend secretstores:get_preferred
/v1/secret-stores/{ss-id} GET x x key_manager:list_backends secretstore:get
/v1/secret-stores/{ss-id}/preferred POST x key_manager:manage_preferred_backend secretstores_preferred:post
DELETE x key_manager:manage_preferred_backend secretstores_preferred:delete
/v1/quotas GET x key_manager:list_quotas quotas:get
/v1/project-quotas GET x key_manager:get_system_quotas project_quotas:get
/v1/project-quotas/{project-id} GET x key_manager:get_system_quotas project_quotas:get
PUT x key_manager:set_system_quotas project_quotas:put
DELETE x key_manager:set_system_quotas project_quotas:delete
/v1/orders GET x key_manager:list_orders orders:get
PUT x key_manager:submit_orders orders:put This call is missing from the API reference: https://docs.openstack.org/barbican/latest/api/reference/orders.html. Perhaps it needs to be removed: https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2002579
POST x key_manager:submit_orders orders:post
/v1/orders/{order-id} GET x key_manager:get_orders order:get
DELETE x key_manager:delete_orders order:delete
  • key_manager:manage_acl
    • (dmendiza) Is this too broad?
    • (dmendiza) Should we have separate key_manager:(secret|order)_manage_acl?
    • (dmendiza) Should member be allowed to manage ACL? Would private secrets break if we don't? Are private secrets really private it we do?
    • (dmendiza) Is there a way to reference the User by ID to introduce the concept of a secret owner into this policy?
  • key_manager:store_secrets
    • (dmendiza) Is it ok to use this for adding metadata to a secret? I think it is.
  • key_manager:delete_secret_meta
    • (dmendiza) Is it ok for a member to delete secret meta?
Retrieved from "https://wiki.openstack.org/w/index.php?title=Barbican/Policy&oldid=162361"